Anda di halaman 1dari 37

Reward Systems

Compensation Theory, Job Evaluation and Pay Administration


Why is compensation important to

organizations?
Need to control costs to remain solvent and

competitive
Need to remain competitive with internal and

external labor markets Need to use pay to motivate employees

The basic problem: a limited pie to divide

among all employees


Page 2 MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

Information from DoL, Bureau of Labor Statistics

Compensation Costs Per Hour


$30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0

19 93

19 95

19 97

19 99

20 01

20 03

20 05

Wages & Salaries


Page 3

Benefits
Fall 2008

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

20 07

What is a Job Worth?


Market price; willing seller and willing buyer
Issues of justice and equity
Male/female wage differentials U.S. wages vs. wages in less developed countries

Gaps between executive and rank-and-file employee pay


Currently in US around 400x rank-and-file pay (20x for most of 20th century -- comparable to Canada & UK) Especially an issue in the current environment (Fall 2008)

But....does CEO incentive pay lead to performance? Who knows?

Page 4

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Womens Pay Equality


100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 1951 1964: 59.1% 2006: 76.9% 1951: 63.9%

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

Page 5

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

The Basic Pay Model


Compensation plan efficiency based on:
Internal consistency External competitiveness

Employee contributions to the firm

Compensation:
All forms of financial returns and tangible

services and benefits employees receive as part of an employment relationship


Page 6 MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

A Basic Question
Can we satisfy everybody?
Perceptions of fairness come from:
Actual pay amounts Relative pay amounts on internal basis Relative pay amounts on external basis Pay administration

Page 7

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Job Evaluation
Determining the relative value of jobs within

the organization General basis:


Effort Skill Responsibility Working conditions

Approaches Whole job (ranking, classification) Decomposed (point factor)


Page 8 MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

Ranking
How to: Order the jobs from highest to lowest
Pro and con Easy to use and to explain to employees Cumbersome for any but the small organization Very difficult to add jobs / re-evaluate jobs Very subjective; it is difficult to say what criteria are being used, so difficult to justify/explain to employees or courts
Page 9 MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

Classification
How to: Set up grades or categories with descriptions of the necessary responsibility, skill, effort and working conditions (or other factors as desired) Include benchmark or representative jobs to serve as anchors; these should be

Page 10

Common and well-known Stable content Truly representative of grade Can be priced on external market
MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

U.S. Government General Schedule


Used since 1923
Includes 18 classes or grades Uses 9 factors to develop grades These factors fit into the four categories

of skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions

Page 11

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

GS Factors

Knowledge required by the position


Complexity

Nature or kind of knowledge and skills needed How the knowledge and skills are used in doing the work How the work is assigned The employees responsibility for carrying out the work How the work is reviewed The nature of guidelines for performing the work The judgement needed to apply the guidelines or develop new guides

Supervisory controls

The nature of the assignment The difficulty in identifying what needs to be done The difficulty and originality involved in performing the work The purpose of the work The impact of the work product or service

Scope and effort


Guidelines

Personal contacts Purpose of contacts Physical demands Work environment

Page 12

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Classification: Pro and Con


Used by U.S. government (not

necessarily a positive factor, but some evidence that it works) Relatively easy to develop and administer Can be difficult to write grades for jobs from multiple job families
Page 13 MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

Point-Factor Plans
The most commonly used type of job

evaluation method Make the criteria for comparisons explicit, unlike ranking and classification The criteria for classification (the compensable factors) are related to the strategy of the business; they are the factors valued by or of high worth to the firm
Page 14 MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

Point-Factor: How it Works

Point factor plans all include three elements:


Compensable factors are defined Degrees or level of each factor are given numerical rankings Factors weighted as to their relative value to the organization Job worth is measured by the total number of points

The steps to follow:


Job analysis Determine compensable factors Scale the factors Weight the factors Communications and documentation Apply the plan
Page 15 MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

Compensable Factors Characteristics in the work that the organization values, that help it pursue its strategy and achieve its objectives

Selecting Compensable Factors

These should be:


Based on the work performed Based on the strategy and values of the organization Acceptable and considered to be fair by all concerned parties

As a result, compensable factors should be developed by each organization, rather than using an off-the-shelf plan Basic group of compensable factors:

Skill Effort Responsibility Working conditions

Page 16

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

The Hay Plan


A widely used plan developed by a consulting firm, Hay Associates, and aimed toward management jobs It includes:

Know-how Functional expertise Managerial skills Human relations Problem solving Environment Challenge Accountability Freedom to act Impact of end results Magnitude
Page 17 MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

Other Plans
J.C. Penney looks at:
Decision making impact on the companys objectives Communications Supervision and management

Knowledge requirements
Internal customers External customers

Many firms (i.e., 3M, TRW) add a factor for

International Responsibilities

Page 18

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Weighting Compensable Factors

Each factor contributes a different amount towards the total score for the job, depending on the importance of the factor to the organization. These weights can be arrived at in two ways
Committee judgments (compensation committee, which is made up

of management representatives)
Statistical analysis: the weights are chosen so that the factor scores

for a selected group of benchmark jobs will predict market prices or current rates for those jobs

When compensable factors are weighted and the total number of points determined, points assigned to each level of the factors

Page 19

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Point-Factor: Pro and Con


Point-factor systems orderly, rational, and

make criteria for evaluating jobs explicit


Time consuming to set up (and they do need

to be periodically updated), but very simple to add new jobs


Job evaluations may still be affected by what

the evaluator already knows or believes the market value of the job to be
Page 20 MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

Why Conduct Salary Surveys?


To create and adjust pay structure
Adjust actual pay in response to the market
All jobs on scheduled basis (almost a COLA); be careful this

doesnt become an entitlement Jobs for which supply or demand has changed

Monitor other forms of pay, such as shift differentials,

bonuses, incentives, overtime practices Estimate competitors labor costs


However, we cannot market price every job

Page 21

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

What Is The Market?

Who?

Employers who compete for the same occupations and skills Employers who compete for employees in the same geographic area Employers who compete with the same products

How to determine this?

Who are our competitors?


Where do we recruit? Where are employees going? If labor market is rich in a particular skill, may recruit/price locally If labor market does not include skills, recruiting and pricing are on a wider scale Commuting time within a market may also be a factor

Interaction of skill/place/product

Page 22

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Guidelines for Salary Surveys (I)


How many firms to include
Include fewer firms if you are a major employer and make

the market Commercial surveys often include several hundred firms (but they make money by getting participants and selling them surveys)

Price fixing issues


Under the Sherman Act, surveys can be viewed as a

conspiracy in restraint of trade Having a third party conduct the survey protects you, but you lose control
Page 23 MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

Guidelines for Salary Surveys (II)

Make or buy
For national data, may need to buy from a consultant Some firms may be reluctant to respond to your survey, but will

participate in third-party survey More control with own survey


Purchasing a survey means you get what they want to report Running your own survey takes more time, but may be less

expensive Odd jobs, local jobs may not be available commercially

Free data from Department of Labor...but you get what you pay for (useful in general terms)

Page 24

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Guidelines for Salary Surveys (III)


What jobs to survey
Benchmark jobs: Well-known and stable content Stable pricing (stable supply/demand) Represent entire structure Represent majority of covered positions

Market sensitive jobs

Page 25

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

What Data to Collect


Basic company information, for comparability,

weighting of results How closely surveyed jobs match your jobs Salary range
Actual pay (individuals, range or average); may

include actual pay and tenure/experience Other forms of compensation


Benefits (optional)

Page 26

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

How to Survey
Mail surveys cheapest, but may not be as

accurate
Interviews are more accurate (allow you to

verify content) but are very time consuming


Compromises may be phone verification or

interviews every second or third year (DoL surveys)

Page 27

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Putting it Together: The Pay Regression Line


Job evaluation (internal equity) gives us

relative value of jobs within the organization


Salary surveys (external equity) gives us

dollar value of selected jobs outside the organization


The pay regression line combines the two

sources of information
Page 28 MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

Basic Information
Job
Receptionist File Clerk Mail Clerk Accounting Clerk Insurance Clerk Customer Service Rep Senior Accounting Clerk Word Processor Telephone Operator Department Secretary HR Assistant Legal Secretary
Page 29

Evaluation Points
490 500 510 600 680 825 875 890 1,000 1,150 1,175 1,200
MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Market Value
$11.45 11.32 12.05 14.39 15.74 14.61 15.28 14.68 15.73 13.68 16.70 19.07
Fall 2008

The Pay Regression Line


$25.00 $20.00 $15.00 $10.00 $5.00 $0.00 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400

Legal Secty

Dept. Secty

Page 30

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Developing Pay Grades


Pay grades are convenient groupings of a wide

variety of jobs...similar in work difficulty and responsibility requirements but possibly having nothing else in common
Pay grades allow compensation to be administered

for a group of jobs that are worth approximately the same A pay grade can be a single rate or a range of rates
An administrative convenience

Page 31

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Basic Characteristics of Pay Grades


Grades normally provide for a range of pay rates, though single rates are possible Pay grades contain a minimum, midpoint and maximum The range from minimum to maximum can be from 20% to 100%, with 30% to 35% being most common The midpoint of pay grades increase in a constant percentage, normally 5% to 15%. However, the percentage increase may be larger at the top of the pay structure There is normally some overlap between pay grades. If there is a 30% range within a pay grade and there is a 10% difference between midpoints, there will be a 67% overlap

Page 32

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Developing Pay Grades

How many grades? Differences between grades? Grade width?

The range of jobs included in the structure is an influence. A wider range of jobs requires more grades, possibly wider grades (to cover a wider range of pay) or less overlap between grades Fewer pay grades will normally be wider pay grades, allowing the organization to place more emphasis on recognizing time in job Can be argued that differences between grades should increase as one advances through the pay structure; the value of incumbents in higher level jobs increases more with time and wider variation in performance is possible. In lower level jobs, the learning curve levels off much sooner and there is less scope for harming or contributing to the organization

Small increments between pay grades reduces the effect of an error in assigning a job to a pay grade

Page 33

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Other Issues
Single rate pay grade?
Is there a single market rate for the job, or are there a

variety of rates? How do you then reward seniority or performance? Often found in union settings

What is the midpoint?


Midpoint is the market rate for the job However, firm may determine their market rate as being

higher or lower than the survey average

Page 34

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Other Pay Plan Issues


Who evaluates jobs?
Moving individuals through pay structures Merit vs. seniority Special situations Pay differentials Compression between employees and supervisors Compression between old and new employees

Page 35

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Moving Individuals Through Pay Structures


Merit vs. seniority
Faster progression to the midpoint, then slow

down
Grade maximum; what then?
Special situations Red circled jobs Green circled jobs

Page 36

MGMT 412 | Reward Systems

Fall 2008

Pay Compression

Between employees and supervisors


May occur if employees are very senior and supervisors brought in from outside Also possible if employees work significant overtime or have shift pay May also happen with commission sales and sales management Solutions:
Ensure sufficient distance between pay ranges for employees and supervisors (10%) and watch actual pay Pay commissions to sales managers or select sales management staff who are motivated by security rather than money

Compression between current and newly hired employees


Page 37

Happens when market rates change faster than employees move through grade
What happens if an employee can quit and be rehired at a higher salary? Solution: Adjust rate of progression through grade
MGMT 412 | Reward Systems Fall 2008

Anda mungkin juga menyukai