INTRODUCTION
Purpose: To relate the respondents knowledge of Indian food attributes with their knowledge of their personal values hence to find out if aspects of English culture and Indian culture have similarities or differences with respect to specific Indian food attributes and how these similarities and differences are related to one another Importance: To aid promotion and marketing positioning of branded Indian foods in UK. Relevance:
LITERATURE REVIEW
Mead(1943) describes the relationship
between culture and food habits. According to Lyman (1989)Psychological and Physiological attributes relate to sensory attributes of food. According to Asp(1999), important factors while examining consumers decisionmaking are: Cultural Factors Psychological Factors Lifestyle Factors
LITERATURE REVIEW
Food Marketing Institute Survey of
Food Shoppers(1998) studies Sensory attributes Sloan(1998) identified food trends that consumers are likely to respond to. Mead (2002) discusses how social classes affect each other in food demand
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKVariables
Personal values such as the following are
identified
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK(contd.)
called means-end chains. Laddering Method : In depth, one-to-one Interviews Stage 1-Pilot work: Choice of Product Categories Elicitation of Constructs(4+4) - 3 questions Stage 2 Mapping and Charting: Laddering Interviews(12+12) 45 mins each Content Analysis: Identify and Label A/C/V Laddering s/w to produce HVMs (Hierarchical
DATA COLLECTION
Primary data Direct Personal Interview Method Snowball Design is used
FINDINGS
Health & Enjoyment Most
important for both groups Convenience & Savings Least important Ready Meals Least popular Culture/Ethnic traditions provide different orientations
FINDINGS(contd.)
DISCUSSIONS
Lifestyle theme of food
consumption analyses convenience food consumption on the basis of time and space constraints. This study focuses on Social and Cultural Factors that affect convenience food consumption. Ethnicity is also another factor
LIMITATIONS
Pilot Study was conducted
on a mixed group. Once the constructs had been elicited, difficulty in ascribing the constructs back to individual meal type.
FUTURE WORK
Values can be ranked by
each respondent or group of respondents using conjoint measurement, to know how these values are rated relatively to each other.
REFERENCES
Mead, M. (1943). The problem of changing food habits. Bulletin of the
Mintel, London.
Sloan, A. (1998) Food industry forecast: consumer trends to 2020 and
York.
Asp, E. (1999) Factors affecting food decisions made by individual
of Changing Food Habits.Report of the Committee on Food Habits 19411943, Bulletin No. 108.National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Food Marketing Institute (1998) Trends in the United States: Consumer
THANK YOU