Chapter 13 Overview
Guide questions we can analyze interactively
Social Dilemmas Competition Perceived Justice Misperception
What social situations feed conflict? What are the processes that enable the achievement of peace?
Conflict
Conflict:
Social Dilemmas
Social traps: when two groups or persons in opposition are found in a scenario where each has the potential to be destructive in behavior due to pursuing self-interests.
Two laboratory games that are each an example of a social trap:
Most people would choose to confess to be granted immunity. Self-interest would be seen in the confession. You can think of it as a win-win situation. If the other does not confess, you go free. However, if he/she does, then he/she does not get the immunity
Small is Beautiful
Make groups small
Communication
Experiment of Robyn Dawes
Conflict:
Competition
Social traps: when two groups or persons in opposition are found in a scenario where each has the potential to be destructive in behavior due to pursuing self-interests.
Two laboratory games that are each an example of a social trap:
Conflict:
Perceived Justice
People perceive justice as:
Equity
Equality
Equity
People perceived justice as equity the distribution of rewards in proportion to individual contributions (Walster & others, 1978).
If one contributes more and benefits less than the other, he will feel exploited and irritated while the other one will feel exploitative and guilty (Greenberg, 1986; Messick & Sentis, 1979).
Equality
Some non-capitalist cultures define culture not as equity but as a equality or even fulfillment of need. From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs (Karl Marx).
Collectivist cultures
Conflict:
Misperception
Aside from truly incompatible goals, misperceptions of others motives and goals came to be another source of conflict. Seeds of such misperceptions:
Self-serving bias Self-justify Fundamental attribution error Group polarization Groupthink Ingroup bias Negative stereotypes
Reciprocal views of each other often held by parties in conflict; for example, each may view itself as moral and peace-loving and the other as evil and aggressive.
Mirror-Image Perceptions
If A expects B to be hostile, A may treat B in such a way that B fulfills As expectations, thus beginning a vicious circle (Kennedy & Pronin, 2008). Opposing sides tend to have a bias blind spot in which they see their own understandings as not biased by their liking or disliking for others; but those who disagree with them seem unfair and biased (Frantz, 2006).
Simplistic Thinking
When tension rises, rational thinking becomes more difficult (Janis, 1989). View become more simplistic and stereotyped and seat-ofthe-pants judgments become more likely (Carnevale & Probst, 1998) Inflexible thinking
Shifting Perceptions
When in conflict, do not assume that the other fails to share your values and morality. Rather, compare perceptions, assuming that the other is likely perceiving the situation differently (Myers, 2013).
Peace
A condition marked by low levels of hostility and aggression and by mutually beneficial relationships.
Peace:
Contact
When tensions run high, contact may fuel a fight.
Two laboratory games that are each an example of a social trap: