A S H O RT P R IM E R O N T H E F U T U R E O F H O U S IN G FINANCE
MILKEN INSTITUTE CENTER FOR FINANCIAL MARKETS NATIONAL PRESS FOUNDATION TUESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2013
Overview
2
Background
GSEs
Key Insights Future Design
Transition
3 7 12 18 27
-2.0 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14
Source: Moodys Analytics
-2.0
Conforming Mortgages
MBS Investors
Debt Investors
Implicit Guarantee Government 1: Bundle conforming mortgages into MBS and provide a guarantee - Socially valuable, but put taxpayers at risk from underpriced insurance. 2: Purchase those guaranteed MBS for the firms own portfolios. - Firms borrowed at low rates to invest in higher-yielding MBS. Essentially a hedge fund made possible by the implicit government guarantee. 3: Affordable housing goals
1: Bundle mortgages into MBS w/guarantee 2: Buy MBS for own portfolio investment
Enormous - $5.5 trillion in MBS & guarantees Insolvent - losses ate up thin capital Under Federal conservatorship since Sept 2008 Now very profitable - $20 billion/year Government owns 79.9 percent, has $187.5 billion senior preferred
2006 Total Government Backed Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac Fannie Mae Freddie Mac Federal Housing Administration Privately Backed Mortgage insurers Depository Institutions Private Label Mortgage Securities Subprime Alt-A Option ARMs Jumbo Note: Securitized HELOC 17.1 7.1 0.8 0.6 0.2 6.3 10.0 1.5 2.7 5.8 5.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2
2007 38.5 7.7 1.8 1.3 0.5 5.9 30.8 6.9 7.3 16.6 15.5 0.9 0.2 0.0 1.5
2008 136.5 17.9 10.3 6.5 3.8 7.6 118.6 10.8 35.0 72.8 55.9 11.3 5.2 0.4 5.1
2009 216.1 31.8 21.3 13.4 7.9 10.5 184.3 9.6 54.9 119.8 71.6 28.0 17.9 2.3 5.1
2010 190.0 51.4 37.3 23.1 14.2 14.1 138.6 6.6 48.2 83.8 39.0 24.0 17.4 3.4 3.4
2011 161.8 46.3 31.4 18.3 13.1 14.9 115.5 6.0 35.3 74.2 34.7 20.5 14.8 4.1 2.1
449
17.3
Sources: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, FDIC, Federal Reserve Board, Moody's Analytics
Source: John Krainer, Recent Developments in Mortgage Finance, FRBSF Economic Letter, Oct 26, 2009
Overview
8
Background
GSEs
Key Insights Future Design
Transition
3 7 12 18 27
Liquidity in secondary markets Implicit (now explicit) subsidies from federal guarantee kept interest rates a bit lower
borrowers Subsidies and risks not transparent Reduced innovation (for better or worse) Now: conduit for unlimited spending May be most expensive financial rescue
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Support liquidity in secondary market Avoid systemic risks Protect taxpayers Help homeowners Encourage beneficial innovation Promote transparency Recognize relative strengths of government agencies and the private sector
Overview
13
Background
GSEs
Key Insights Future Design
Transition
3 7 12 18 27
Key Insights
14
Agreement on many aspects of housing finance reform Private capital at risk ahead of a secondary government guarantee Government share shrinks as private sector takes on housing risk No GSE portfolios or affordable housing goals; instead explicit support for affordable housing (owner and rental) Foster competition in mortgage origination and guaranty Certainty on housing finance system will help housing
today. Transition steps are the same for all plans being considered.
normal conditions)
Portfolios are an invitation to non-transparent policy creep
portfolio
Fed should do this for monetary purposes Treasury should do this for fiscal purposes
Subsidies conflict with goals of private GSEs Subsidies now hidden via conservatorship
Overview
19
Transition
3 8 12 18 27
Design Options
21
Government-sponsored enterprises Explicit government guarantee & associated fee Are two enough? Government agencies (like FHA / GNMA ) Agencies guarantee and securitize MBS Other GSE activities privatized Mixed model Government agency sells MBS guarantees Private firms, including GSE successors, securitize mortgages and purchase guarantees
Higher insurance premiums. The former GSEs pay a premium that covers expected costs. But government still underprices insurance, so
Entry & competition. Other firms can purchase the guarantee and securitize confirming MBS. Competition reduces risk and increases benefits for borrowers. No affordable housing requirements. Affordable housing is pursued through other means (e.g., FHA). A tax on conforming MBS activities finances these subsidies.
Fannie Mae Freddie Mac Banks & Other Lenders Conforming Mortgages Securitizer A Insured MBS
MBS Investors
Securitizer B
Securitizer C Fee Explicit Guarantee
Five Changes 1. Competing securitizers 2. Explicit guarantee 3. Guarantee applies to MBS, not institutions 4. Fee for the guarantee 5. No portfolios, no associated debt
Government
"A Pragmatic Plan For Housing Finance Reform," by Ellen Seidman, Phillip Swagel, Sarah Wartell and Mark Zandi. Prepared by Moody's Analytics, the Urban Institute and the Milken Institute, June 19, 2013. Available at http://www.milkeninstitute.org
Private Capital
25
Private MBS guarantors are not backed, explicitly or implicitly, by the government. Guarantors purchase catastrophic reinsurance from the government for the benefit of MBS investors, paying a g-fee to the government for this insurance. Several sources of private capital bears the bulk of the credit risk in housing, taking losses ahead of the government and protecting taxpayers.
At the level of individual mortgages, private capital sources include homeowners down payments and the capital of any private mortgage insurers.
At the level of the mortgage-backed security, capital sources would include, but not be limited to the capital of the MBS insurer and the capital put at risk by global investors who take on housing risk from MBS insurers.
Entry of new sources of private capital is essential to provide for competition in the new housing finance system.
FMIC ensures that institutions of all sizes have access to the housing finance system.
"A Pragmatic Plan For Housing Finance Reform," by Ellen Seidman, Phillip Swagel, Sarah Wartell and Mark Zandi. Prepared by Moody's Analytics, the Urban Institute and the Milken Institute, June 19, 2013. Available at http://www.milkeninstitute.org
Independent government agency oversees the housing finance system and covers losses on guaranteed MBS after the private capital of MBS insurers is exhausted. Oversees the Mortgage Insurance Fund, which is funded by guarantee fees charged to MBS insurers for the catastrophic government reinsurance. Sets standards for single- and multifamily loans in government-guaranteed MBS to ensure strong mortgage loan quality. Sets standards for and supervises servicers of guaranteed mortgages, in coordination with other regulators. Ensures that sufficient high-quality private capital is at risk before the government guarantee. Approve mechanisms by which private capital is brought in ahead of the government guarantee, and sets standards and supervises MBS insurers. Oversees the single securitization platform and sets securitization requirements. Ensures that a to-be-announced (TBA) market continues for guaranteed mortgages, coordinating with the SEC as needed.
"A Pragmatic Plan For Housing Finance Reform," by Ellen Seidman, Phillip Swagel, Sarah Wartell and Mark Zandi. Prepared by Moody's Analytics, the Urban Institute and the Milken Institute, June 19, 2013. Available at http://www.milkeninstitute.org
R&D Fund to support research, development and testing of innovation in products, underwriting, and servicing. Examples include mortgages with reserve accounts; equity sharing; and new housing counseling models. Credit Support Fund to provide capital ahead of the secondary guarantee for activities such as bi-weekly payment mortgages; small rental properties; manufactured housing; assisted living housing; and more. Capital Magnet Fund to support affordable housing for low-income families. Competitive awards to CDFIs and non-profit housing developers, with at least $10 of outside funding for every $1 granted. National Housing Trust Fund to support the production, preservation, and rehabilitation of rental housing for low income families.
"A Pragmatic Plan For Housing Finance Reform," by Ellen Seidman, Phillip Swagel, Sarah Wartell and Mark Zandi. Prepared by Moody's Analytics, the Urban Institute and the Milken Institute, June 19, 2013. Available at http://www.milkeninstitute.org
Criticisms
28
securitization and they will engineer the government guarantee to cover the rest of their activities Stress on definition of a conforming loan
25
50
75
100
125
150
Overview
30
Transition
3 8 12 18 27
Transition
31
Multi-family activities
Setting appropriate premiums Definition of conforming mortgage
Policy Levers
32
Policy Levers
33
Policy Lever Price for government insurance on MBS (guarantee fee) Amount of government insurance capacity What policy would entail Charge a higher price for the government guarantee on MBS. Auction off a limited amount of government insurance on MBS. Impact Higher mortgage interest rates as the increased g-fee is passed on to home buyers Offering to insure only a limited amount of conforming mortgages would increase the guarantee fee (as set in an auction) and thus interest rates. Will foster a non-guaranteed market by forcing some mortgage loans outside the conforming standard. These nonguaranteed loans could face higher interest rates (they will not pay the insurance but will not benefit from the guarantee).
Lower the loan limit for conforming loans or otherwise narrow the scope of mortgages that qualify for the guarantee.
Require securitizing firms to Limits government risk but arrange for private capital to take mortgage interest rates will rise, losses before taxpayers. reflecting the cost of the private capital.
FF conservatorship ends
Year 1
Year 3
"A Pragmatic Plan For Housing Finance Reform," by Ellen Seidman, Phillip Swagel, Sarah Wartell and Mark Zandi. Prepared by Moody's Analytics, the Urban Institute and the Milken Institute, June 19, 2013. Available at http://www.milkeninstitute.org
profits. What incentive does this give the government? What are the reasons to move forward with reform? Why not insist on a fully private system? When do you expect reform to happen?