Analysis of Bullwhip effect in multi-product, multi-stage supply chain systems a simulation approach
Contents
Introduction Bullwhip Effect Simulation model Analysis of Bullwhip Effect Case Study Discussion Conclusion
Introduction
Main objectives of a company are: o To synchronize the upstream and downstream flow of goods and services o To respond to uncertainties in customer demand without creating costly inventories Even if uncertainties are known, upstream and downstream do not always synchronize. Manufacturers are often surprised by the degree of variability of distributors orders Hence, a decision support tool is required to reduce and quantify this variability.
Bullwhip Effect
Important Keywords
SDM (System Dynamics Modeling) o A powerful simulation approach for studying and managing complex feedback systems ANFIS (Adaptive network based fuzzy inference system) o Implemented in SDM to increase its reliability for modeling soft variables which exist in supply chain environment MRP (Material Requirement planning) o A production planning and inventory control system used to manage manufacturing processes JIT (Just in Time) o An approach where materials, parts, and other goods are ordered only in quantities required to meet immediate production needs.
Supplier
Manufacturer
Retailer
Proposed model
Supplier Manufacturer Retailer
Inventory Model
Linkage Model
Inventory Model
Linkage Model
Inventory Model
Linkage Model
Inventory Model
Contribution Model
Contribution Model
Contribution Model
Contribution Model
Layer 1: Supply Chain Network Layer Layer 2: Supply Chain contribution Layer Model structure of the single product, multi-stage supply chain
Simulation Model
SC Network layer
Contribution Layer
Inventory Model
Linkage Model
MRP
JIT
SC Network Layer
This layer is designed to create the specific network of a supply chain by linking SC units It is subdivided into two generic models: 1. Inventory Model 2. Linkage Model
Inventory Model
It is developed for modeling an inventory of a SC unit 3 main inputs in the model are No. of inventory, defect rates and decision when shortage of stock
Linkage Model
It is developed to model information and production flows between SC unit Two types of Product and Information Flows: 1. Distribution Linkage Model 2. Product Linkage Model
SC Contribution Layer
Model an ordering process to replenish a stock for each SC unit 3 sub-models in order to model 3 categories of ordering processes : Based on 1. Contribution model 1: Basic Inventory Policies 2. Contribution model 2: MRP 3. Contribution model 3: JIT
Contribution Model 1
Ordering process on the basis of basic inventory policies Firstly users assign ordering policy to identify number of orders released Six general policies are continuous inventory system, periodic order-up-to level inventory, min-max, scheduled ordering, base stock system and special ordering policies Secondly, future demand : Important variable to determine sufficient capacity using forecasting technique Simple moving average , exponential smoothing technique are common
Contribution Model 2
Ordering process based on MRP system Major input to this generic model for creating MRP Schedule are: 1. No. of time periods covered in MRP schedule 2. Equation to calculate gross requirement 3. Minimum inventory level to protect shortage 4. Lot sizing policy: To determine timing and size of an order quantity.
Contribution Model 3
Ordering process for a SC unit based on JIT approach Kanban Cards: Released after products shipped to customers in order to replenish it by placing same amount of order to the supplier Sometimes wait at a heijunka post to divide the order at into small increments for load smoothing Types of Kanban card accumulation before passing to the previous station (ordering policy) : 1. Lot-for-Lot policy: No accumulation and all cards passed to previous station for filling 2. Pattern policy: Accumulation at pattern post until reaching the specific production period 3. Lot making policy: Accumulation until quantity reaches a specific amount
Case Study
Simulation Model
Supply chain of a beverage company (SSC Pty Ltd) was selected Study presents two-product, three-stage supply chain
Case Study
Model Validation
To validate, the bullwhip effect of SC units was collected for a period of 90 days Results show that simulation results were consistent with actual data The error of bullwhip effect estimation varies between 0 and 9%
Case Study
Bullwhip effect analysis
Using VMI strategy, bullwhip effect levels at manufacturer agent are lower than the distribution agent o VMI eliminates one layer of decision making o Eliminates delay and error in information flow at manufacturer
Discussion