William Sharpe, Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium, Journal of Finance, September 1964. John Linter, The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets, Review of Economics and Statistics, February 1965. Jan Mossin, Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market, Econometrica, October 1966.
Market Equilibrium..
We can summarize the equilibrium that will prevail in this hypothetical world of securities and investors. 1. All investors will choose to hold a portfolio of risky assets in proportions that duplicate representation of the assets in the market portfolio (M), which include all traded assets. The proportion of each stock in the market portfolio (M) equals the market value of the stock (price per share * number of shares outstanding) divided by the total market value of all stocks. (MPS* No. of Shares Outstanding)/Total Market Value of All Shares in the Market.
Market Equilibrium..
2. Not only will the market portfolio be on the efficient frontier, but it also will be the tangency portfolio to the optimal capital allocation line (CAL) derived by each and every investor. As a result, the Capital Market Line (CML), the line from risk free rate through the market portfolio, M, is also the best attainable capital allocation line. All investors hold M as their optimal risky portfolio, differing only in the amount invested in it versus in the risk free asset.
Market Equilibrium..
Utility Score of an individual: U = E(r) A 2 Where E(r) = expected return A = index of the investors risk aversion. Consider three investors with different degree of risk aversion: A1 = 2, A2 = 3.5, A3 = 5. All of them are evaluating three portfolios:
Portfolio
L M H
SD
5% 10 20
Rf
Market Equilibrium..
CAPM is an outgrowth of the Markowitz model and extends the concept of optimal diversified portfolios to the market in general and to the valuation of individual securities. That is, the concept is applied in both a macro context that specifies relation between risk and return on a portfolio. (CML) And Micro context that specifies the relationship between risk and the return on a specific asset. (SML)
Rf
T-Bills
An Investors Trade-off Between Risk and Return with a Risk Free Asset.
Large Cap Stocks Expected Return Variance Standard Deviation 15% 225 15% Government Bonds Risk Free Asset 5% 100 10% 4% 0 0%
Correlations: Large Cap Stock and Government bonds =0.5 Large Cap Stock and Risk free asset = 0 Government Bonds and risk free asset = 0 Weights: 1. Entire portfolio in the risk free asset. 2. Entire portfolio in large cap stock. 3. Change in weights. 4. Entire portfolio into government bond. 5. Change in weights 6. Change in weights between large cap and government bonds
As Long as there is a strong relationship between the return on the stock and the return On the market (the Correlation Coeff. Is not a small number), the Beta Coefficient has meaning.
Rs = Rf + (Rm Rf) *
Rf Risk:
Rs = Rf + (Rm Rf) *
Derivation of SML
Consider any portfolio, denoted by p, that consist of the proportion Xi invested in Security i and the proportion (1-Xi) in market portfolio M. For this portfolio: Expected Return rp= Xi*ri + (1-Xi)*rm p = [Xi2i2 + (1-Xi)2m2 + 2*Xi*(1-Xi)*im]1/2
APT Assumption..
Each investor, when given the opportunity to increase the return of his portfolio without increasing risk, will proceed to do so. The mechanism of doing so involves the use of arbitrage portfolios.
Arbitrage Portfolios
Imagine that an investor owns three stocks, and the current market value of his holdings in each one is $40,00,000. in this case the investors current investable wealth W0 is equal to $1,20,00,000. Everyone believe that these three securities have the following expected returns.
I Stock 1 Ri 15% bi .9
2 3
21 12
3.0 1.8
Arbitrage Portfolios
According to APT, an investor will explore the possibility of forming an arbitrage portfolio in order to increase the expected return of his or her current portfolio without increasing its risk. What is an arbitrage portfolio? (1) it is a portfolio that does not require any additional funds from the investor. If Xi denotes the change in the investors holdings of security i (and hence the weight of security I in arbitrage portfolio) then this requirement can be written as: X1+X2+X3 = 0
Arbitrage Portfolios
(2) an arbitrage portfolio has no sensitivity to any factor. (zero factor exposure). Because sensitivity of a portfolio is just a weighted average of sensitivities of the securities in the portfolio to that factor. This requirement of an arbitrage portfolio for one factor model can be written as: b1X1+b2X2+b3X3 = 0 Or, in our example: .9X1+3X2+1.8X3 = 0
Arbitrage Portfolios
At this point many potential arbitrage portfolios can be identified. These portfolios are simply portfolios that meet the requirement equation (1) and (2). Suppose X1 = .1 .1+X2+X3 = 0 .09+3.0X2+1.8X3 = 0 X2= .075 and X3 = -.175.
Arbitrage Portfolios
To see if this candidate portfolio is indeed an arbitrage portfolio, one must determine its expected return. If expected return is positive, then an AP has been identified. X1r1+X2r2+X3r3 >0 15X1+21X2+12X3 >0
APT Limitations..
Measurement of unanticipated changes in factors. APT is in developing process.