SYLLABUS
1.
Introduction, Scope and coverage, Project Function in an organization, Layout of Project Department, Role of Consultants in Project Management
2.
Project Identification Selection of product, identification of market, preparation of feasibility study/report, Project formulation, Evaluation of risks, preparation of project report.
3.
Selection of location and site of the project, Factors affecting location, Policies of Central and State Governments towards location, Legal aspects of Project management
4.
Financial analysis-Profitability Analysis, Social Cost Benefit Analysis Budget and Cash Flows
5.
6.
7.
Quantitative aspects of projects PERT/CPM, Network analysis for monitoring of the project
8.
REFERENCE BOOKS
1. Project Management By S.Chaudhury;
2. Text Book of Project Management
INTRODUCTION
TO
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
PROJECTS
BRING ABOUT CHANGE AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT IS RECOGNIZED AS THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY OF MANAGING SUCH CHANGE.
INTRODUCTION
Project Management is the business process of creating a unique product, service or result. A project is a finite endeavour having specific start and completion dates undertaken to create a quantifiable deliverable. A Project is a specific activity on which money is spent in the expectation of returns. There is therefore a specific starting point, a specific end point and it is intended to achieve a specific objective.
DEFINITION
Project Management Institute (PMI) : A Project is a temporary endeavour undertaken to create a unique product or service. Project Management is the application of knowledge , skills, tools and techniques to project activities in order to meet or exceed stakeholder needs and expectations.
Examples of Project
Redesigning or relocating a production facility Implementing a management information system Constructing national highway. Organizing Olympics Constructing a dam for better irrigation facilities.
PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
Unique activities; Attainment of a specific goal; Sequence of activities; Specified time; Interrelated activities.
Quality
Time Cost Resources
Risk Management
Quality management
Integration Management
Communication Management
Procurement Management
tasks in project Avoid dependencies problems Reduce risks Track progress accurately Organize project process and timeline Improve stakeholder - staff communication Improve management of stakeholders expectations Complete within budget and on time
involvement Executive management support Clear statement of requirements Proper planning Realistic expectations Smaller project milestones Competent staff Ownership Clear vision and objectives Hard working and focused staff
Evaluation
Identification
Formulation
Financing decision
Defining the scope is very important. Scope should be defined in quantitative manner to the extent possible. Qualitative terms in scope definition only lead to litigation.
What ?
How?
Who?
Schedule
Scope is a brief and accurate description of the end-products or deliverables to be expected from the project that meet the requirements.
It describes all the activities that are to be performed, resources that will be consumed and the end-products from the successful completion of the project, including quality standards.
The scope also includes the target outcomes, prospective customers, outputs, work, financial and human resources required to complete the project.
The primary tool to describe a project's scope (work) is the work breakdown structure.
SCOPE STATEMENT
A WBS is not an exhaustive list of work. It is instead a comprehensive classification of project scope.
Organisational planning is a process of identifying, documenting, and assigning project roles, responsibilities, and reporting relationships.
Choosing an appropriate organisational structure facilitates the effective implementation of an organisational plan.
A project managers choice of organisational structure depends on the nature of the project and the degree of control required for its implementation.
Some of the organisational structures that a project manager can consider are: Traditional Organisational Structure
It
Advantages
Easy control, budgeting procedures Sharing of knowledge and responsibility and grouping of specialists Flexibility in use of broad manpower Continuity in functional disciplines Reporting structure with good control over people Quick reactions to situations depending upon the functional managers priority.
24
Disadvantages
No single person is responsible for the total project lack of authority and hence
Project-oriented emphasis is absent and hence lacks customer focus and slow in responding to customers needs, ideas are function oriented and not projectorienteddifficulty in achieving tasks
25
It is
developed on the basis of managing individual products as Each individual product is assigned a
functional departments.
The basic advantage of this structure is the individual line of authority, i.e. a single individual has the authority to control the entire activity.
Its narrow reporting structure helps develop a strong communication channel along with accelerated feedback.
26
Advantages
Enables strong control because of single project authority Direct link between the project manager and other stakeholders Develops strong communication channels Maintains project expertise without sharing key personnel Facilitates speedy reactions to situations Facilitates loyalty of team members towards project Retains attention on customer relations Enhances decision making efficiency of senior management
Disadvantages
multi-product organizations
Retains personnel in projects longer than necessary Firms progress is hindered by the lack of strong functional groups and technology Controlling functional specialists requires top level coordination Technology is not shared among projects No career prospects for the project team
Organisations working on large and long-term projects usually adopt pure project organisational structure.
This type of organisation structure contains functional departments within the individual projects.
All the team members contribute on full time basis. This is a vertical organisational structure which avoids conflicts and problems faced by the traditional and product organisational structures.
28
Advantages Disadvantages
The Project Manager has complete authority over Inefficiency in resource utilization the project The Project Manager has the freedom to acquire the Duplication of facilities resources needed for the projects progress The Project team reports directly to the Project Sourcing personnel from internal Manager thus develops a formal communication functional departments to work on channel between the Project Manager and his team the project affects work in the functional departments The Project personnel are shared between the project and the project organization Facilitates unity of command
29
It makes the Project Manager totally responsible and accountable for the success for a project.
30
The Project Manager is responsible for the technical excellence functional departments in managing the departments.
of the
The primary objective of the Matrix organisational structure is to derive synergy through shared responsibility between the project and functional management.
The strength of the structure depends on the level of control that the Project Manager is able to exercise over the functional resources.
All the team members commit to spend full time on the project Conflicts are resolved quickly.
32
General Manager
01/01/2010
HR Manager
Finance Manager
PM 1
PM 2
PM 3
: Horizontal Lines from PMs (Project Managers) : Project Relationships/Responsibilities; : Personnel in the various departments;
33
SELECTING AN ORGANISATIONAL
STRUCTURE
The parameters to be considered while selecting the type of organisational structure may generally include: size of the project, duration of the project, physical location of the project, availability of resources uniqueness of the project,
experience of the organisation in managing projects and transparency at the senior management level
After selecting the appropriate structure, it is necessary to select the personnel required to work on the project.
The Right People for the Right Jobs have to be identified and engaged for the success of 34 the project.
5.
6.
7.
According to Hobbs and Menard, the following seven factors influence the choice of PM structure: Size of Project; Strategic importance; Novelty and need for innovation; Need for integration (number of departments involved; Environmental complexity; Budget and time constraints and Stability of resource requirements.
Project Management consulting is one of the growing consultation businesses since, before starting any projects, more and more companies seek the services of
Pricing and cost recovery, generating new sources of revenues to finance the infrastructure balancing economic and environmental considerations in practice, by assessing the environmental impacts, suggesting the measures for their mitigation and identifying the economic costs of environmental degradation, so that pricing of infrastructure services takes these costs into account.
Policy and institutional framework, including thrust areas for investment, norms for
setting up projects and financing them, organisations involved, and the regulatory framework-including centre-state matters;
Advisory services, such as project formulation, covering scouting, feasibility and modalities, liaison and documentation, environmental and sociological issues, and sectoral expertise;
Financing mechanisms, for stakeholders, including government, debt and/or equity participation, and alliances, both domestic and foreign;
Techno-sociological management synergy, to bring about collaborative efforts of specialists, community, government and other stake holders.