Outline
Introduction Design Fabrication Performance Summary
2
Introduction
Double-gate FET (DGFET) can reduce Short Channel Effects (SCEs)
Reduce Drain-Induced-Barrier-Lowering Improve Subthreshold Swing S
Medici-predicted DIBL and subthreshold swing versus effective channel length for DG and bulk-silicon nFETs
E J Nowak, I Aller, T Ludwig, K Kim R V Joshi, C-T Chuang, K Bernstein and R Puri, IEEE Circuits and Dev. Magazine, p20-31, Jan/Feb 2004
Introduction
Three Types of Double-gate FET
Quasi-COMS structure Relatively simple FAB
4
J Kretz, L Dreeskornfeld, J Hartwich, and W Rosner, Microelectronic Eng. 67-68, p763-768, 2003
Introduction
First FinFET - DELTA (DEpleted Lean-channel TrAnsistor)
5
D.Hisamoto, T.Kaga, Y.Kawamoto, and E.Takeda, IEEE Electron Dev. Lett., vol.11, no.1, p36-38, Jan 1990
Design - Geometry
Hfin >> Tfin Top gate oxide thickness >> sidewall oxide thickness
Effective channel length Leff = Lgate + 2Lext Effective channel width W = Tfin + 2Hfin
H -J L Gossmann, et al., IEEE Trans on Nanotechnology, vol.2, no.4, p 285-290, 2003 Gen Pei, et al., IEEE Trans on Electron Dev., vol.49, no.8, p1411-1419, 2002
The saturation of Vth roll-off and S is observed when Hfin is increased from 20 nm to 90 nm The critical Hfin needed for saturation is dependent on Tfin For larger Tfin, the critical Hfin is correspondingly larger
7
Gen Pei, et al., IEEE Trans on Electron Dev., vol.49, no.8, p1411-1419, 2002
Vth roll-off and S change more and more rapidly as Tfin changing from 10 nm to 60 nm, and slow down after that Fin thickness reduce can suppress short channel effects, but the variation will change the performance of the device a lot
8
Gen Pei, et al., IEEE Trans on Electron Dev., vol.49, no.8, p1411-1419, 2002
Kidong Kim, et al., Japanese J of Appl. Phys., vol.43, no.6B, p3784-3789, 2004
10
Fabrication
6.5 nm Si fin by Berkeley Team
Poly-Si
Si fin
11
Yang-Kyu Choi et al., Solid-State Electronics 46, p1595-1601, 2002
Alternative: Electron Beam Lithography (20nm gate length and 15nm fin thickness was achieved)
Yang-Kyu Choi et al., Solid-State Electronics 46, p1595-1601, 2002 W Rosner, et al., Solid-State Electronics 48, p1819-1823, 2004
12
Performance
14
Chenming Hu, et al. Dept. of EECS, UC-Berkeley, IEDM, p251-254, 2002
Performance - IV Characteristics
The drive currents are 446 uA/um for n-FinFET and 356 uA/um for p-FinFET respectively The peak transconductance of the p-FinFET is very high (633uS/um at 105 nm Lg), because the hole mobility in the (110) channel is enhanced 15
Chenming Hu, et al. Dept. of EECS, UC-Berkeley, IEDM, p251-254, 2002
Gate Delay is 0.34 ps for n-FET and 0.43 ps for p-FET respectively at 10 nm Lg
Gate leakage current is comparable to planar FET with the same gate oxide thickness 16
Chenming Hu, et al. Dept. of EECS, UC-Berkeley, IEDM, p251-254, 2002
Medici-predicted DIBL and subthreshold swing versus effective channel length for DG and bulk-silicon nFETs
The subthreshold slope is 125 mV/dec for n-FET and 101 mV/dec for p-FET respectively The DIBL is 71 mV/V n-FET and 120 mV/V for p-FET respectively 17
Chenming Hu, et al. Dept. of EECS, UC-Berkeley, IEDM, p251-254, 2002
Summary
Easy in concept----Tough to build
Double-gate FET can reduce Short Channel Effects and FinFET is the leading DGFET Optimization design includes geometry, S-D finextension doping, dielectric thickness scaling, threshold voltage control. Fabrication of FinFET is compatible with CMOS process 10 nm gate length, 12 nm fin width device has been fabricated and shows good performance
18