0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
40 tayangan20 halaman
Synthetic lubricating oils have developed a reputation for working in the most extreme conditions. The evolution of mineral oil processing has led to the introduction of new families of products. These "newer" synthetics are based on severely hydroprocessed mineral oils.
Deskripsi Asli:
Judul Asli
X - All Nadasdi1 - Synthetics Are Not the Same Presentation
Synthetic lubricating oils have developed a reputation for working in the most extreme conditions. The evolution of mineral oil processing has led to the introduction of new families of products. These "newer" synthetics are based on severely hydroprocessed mineral oils.
Synthetic lubricating oils have developed a reputation for working in the most extreme conditions. The evolution of mineral oil processing has led to the introduction of new families of products. These "newer" synthetics are based on severely hydroprocessed mineral oils.
2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved.
All Synthetic Oils Are Not The Same
Dr. T. Tim Nadasdi Dr. Jim T. Carey Dr. Angela Galiano-Roth
2 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Introduction Synthetic lubricating oils have developed a reputation for working in the most extreme conditions. They have been associated with superior performance thermal and oxidative stability shear stability low temperature performance low frictional properties The evolution of mineral oil processing has recently led to the introduction of new families of products, marketed as synthetic lubricants based on severely hydroprocessed mineral oils This presentation will provide some insight into: fundamental characteristics of these newer synthetics compared to traditional synthetic oils effects that these base oils have on finished lubricant/grease performance 3 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. API Basestock Classifications API Basestock Classification Physical Specifications Group VI Sulfur % wt. Saturates % wt Manufacturing Process I 80-120 >0.03 <90 Conventional (solvent refining) II 80-120 <0.03 >90 Require Hydrocracking/dewaxing III >120 <0.03 >90 Requires severe Hydrocracking/dewaxing IV >140 0.00 >90 Chemical Synthesis - PAO V All other synthetics - esters, polyglycols, phosphate esters... 4 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Parameter Group I Group II Group III Group IV Comparison of Basestock Properties Oxidation Stability Volatility Additive Solvency of basestock Low Temperature capability Efficiency / Traction Relative costs 1 1.1-1.2 1.5 4 to 10 Viscosity range at 40 deg C (in cSt) Up to 500 Up to 120 Up to 40 Up to 50,000 Direction of arrow indicates improved performance Generalized Comparison of Base Stock Properties 5 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Mineral Oil Molecular Make-Up Presentation Symbol Chemical Advantage in a Lubricant Disadvantage in a Lubricant Short Chain Paraffins High volatility Low flash Pt. Medium Chain Paraffins Higher VI Therm. & oxid. stability Low solvency Long Chain Paraffins High VI Therm. & oxid. stability Low solvency Waxy Aromatics High solvency High viscosity Poor oxid. stability Low VI Heteroatomic Molecules (S, N) Sometimes oxidative stability Can affect other properties (foam, Demuls, oxidation) Saturated Rings Better low temp. Better solvency Adds some viscosity Poor oxidative stability A H R Group I oils are a mixture of many different molecules with different properties R R R H H H H H A A A A A A 6 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Mineral Oil Group I - Group III Processing Hydroprocessing Further Hydroprocessing R R R H H H H H A A A A A A GP I R R R R R R R R GP II R R R GP III Polyalphaolephin (PAO) Viscosity controlled by molecular design 7 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Basestock Summary The processes used to manufacture Group II and Group III oils limit their viscosity to ~120 and 40 cSt at 40 o C, respectively Group II and Group III base oils require liquid thickening agents to meet the viscosity requirements of many industrial applications PAO oils achieve their high viscosity through molecular design and do not require liquid thickening agents for typical industrial applications
8 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. 0 50 100 150 200 250 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Year C a p a c i t y
( 1 0 0 0
B B L / d a y ) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Group II Group I Total Capacity 86% 14% 29% 71% 51% 49% North American Base Oil Capacity Change 9 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Market Changes 1999 ruling by the National Advertising Division of the Better Business Bureau has expanded the meaning of the word synthetic relative to lubricants Synthetic base oil compositions may include a variety of base oils that have been chemically altered and when formulated properly deliver the performance standards expected from a synthetic lubricant GP II, GP III and white oils may fit the new criteria for synthetics Increased North American market capacity for GP II & III oils
Practical Result - the meaning of the term synthetic has been expanded and can no longer be just associated with the performance strengths and chemistry of GP IV/V stocks. 10 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Lets Look at 3 Synthetic Gear Oils All 3 oils are considered synthetic hydrocarbons The difference in the oils is in the blend of PAO, Polyisobutylene (PIB) and Group III base stocks All other additives in the oils are the same 11 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Three Synthetic Gear Oils 1. The same commercial premium gear oil additive package in all oils 2. The same commercially available ester in all oils The oils differ ONLY in their base stock composition Oil A Oil B Oil C Hydrocarbon Type PAO PAO/PIB GP III/PIB Viscosity ISO 460 ISO 460 ISO 460 Viscosity Index 164 150 145 PAO 88 51 Polyisobutylene (PIB) 37 37 Group III Oil 51 Gear Oil Additive Package 1 2 2 2 Ester 2 10 10 10 Total 100 100 100 12 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Test Regiment Bulk Oil Oxidation Test - This test is run for 24 hours at 375 o F. Air is bubbled though the test oil which contains a metal catalyst. Viscosity increase and TAN are measured.
Worm Gear Test - This test involves running oils in a worm gear at various loads. It is run for 48hrs during which time the oil temperature and gear box efficiency are monitored. The used oil is tested for shear stablity (viscosity loss) and wear metals. Test Method Relation to Lubricant Performance Pour Point ASTM D97 In general, lower pour points indicate better low temperature performance Brookfield Visc ASTM D5133 Related to flowability and pumpability of oil at lower temperatures Bulk Oil Oxidation See Below Estimation of oxidation stability and oil life Worm Gear Test See Below Shows lubricant performance in a real worm gear box 13 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Low Temperature Results - Pour Point Even with PPD concentration optimized for lowest pour point, Oil C still has a pour point that is 9 o C higher than PAO or PAO/PIB blends Oil A (PAO) Oil B (PAO/PIB) Oil C (GP III/PIB) Oil C + PPD -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 1 2 3 4 D e g r e e
C e l s i u s -33 o C -24 o C -18 o C 14 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 -10 -20 -30 Temperature o C V i s c o s i t y
i n
c P Oil A (PAO) Oil B (PAO/PIB) Oil C (GP III/PIB) Low Temperature Results - Brookfield Viscosity Oil A shows significantly better flow characteristics at lower temperatures 15 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Bulk Oil Oxidation Results Both TAN and viscosity increase indicate that Oil C undergoes the highest oxidation 0 5 10 15 20 25 % Change in Viscosity 7 7 23 Change in TAN (mg KOH/g) 0.4 2.6 3.2 Oil A (PAO) Oil B (PAO/PIB) Oil C (GP III/PIB) V i s c o s i t y
C h a n g e
( % )
T A N
C h a n g e
( m g
K O H / g )
16 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Testing in a Worm Gear Box Worm Gear (Steel) Bearings (Steel) Driven Gear (Cu/Sn alloy) 17 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Gear Box Efficiency (%) Oil A (PAO) has an average efficiency benefit of 6% over Oil C (GP III/PIB) 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Hours Oil A (PAO) Oil B (PAO/PIB) Oil C (GP III/PIB) E f f i c i e n c y
( % )
Worm Gear Test Results 18 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Sump Temperature ( o F) 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200 205 210 215 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Hours T e m p e r a t u r e
( o F )
Oil A (PAO) Oil B PAO/PIB) Oil C GpIII/PIB) Oil A Oil B Oil C Hydrocarbon Type PAO PAO/PIB GpIII/PIB Viscosity Change - 1.8% - 4.8% - 5.9% Cu, ppm 70 320 1100 Sn, ppm 25 42 160 Fe, ppm 1 2 8 Used Oil Data Worm Gear Test Results 19 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Oil Summary Group II oils are limited to ~120 cSt and Group III to ~40cSt Group II and Group III base oils require thickening agents to meet the viscosity requirements of many industrial applications Synthetic industrial lubricants made with Group II/III oils MAY have different performance properties than lubricants made with PAO alone Selection of synthetic lubricants should focus on product performance, application requirements, and field experience All synthetics ARE NOT the same 20 of 20 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved. Considerations for Greases Performance differences seen in oils will likely translate to greases
Need to understand grease lubrication regimes and determine which type of synthetic oil will perform best in the intended application
Different types of synthetic oils will likely interact differently with grease thickeners Effect on bleed rate? Effect on shear stability? Effect on thickener reaction? Effect on low temperature properties?