0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
377 tayangan17 halaman
Taken from the "National Conference on Environment & Natural Resources (ENR) Financing" Sept. 23-24, 2009, Crowne Plaza Hotel, Quezon City, Philippines
More at http://ecosolutionsmanila.blogspot.com/
Taken from the "National Conference on Environment & Natural Resources (ENR) Financing" Sept. 23-24, 2009, Crowne Plaza Hotel, Quezon City, Philippines
More at http://ecosolutionsmanila.blogspot.com/
Taken from the "National Conference on Environment & Natural Resources (ENR) Financing" Sept. 23-24, 2009, Crowne Plaza Hotel, Quezon City, Philippines
More at http://ecosolutionsmanila.blogspot.com/
Overview of PPIAF • Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF) is a global multi-donor technical assistance facility managed by The World Bank – Established in 1999 – joint initiative of Japan, UK and WB – Grants not loans – Field offices in Manila, Delhi, Dakar and Nairobi
• Helps developing countries improve the quality of infrastructure
• Supports efforts of governments to realize the full potential of private sector involvement in infrastructure • Can finance a range of advisory and related activities in a single country or across multiple countries • Two windows: PPIAF Core Program and Sub-National Technical Assistance PPIAF’s Donors PPIAF Core Program • TA grants to support efforts of governments to realize the full potential of private sector involvement in infrastructure – Infrastructure strategies – Designing and implementing reforms – Building consensus – Developing local capacity – Pioneering transactions
• Identify, disseminate and promote best practices on PPP issues
• Annual budget of $20m; portfolio of approx $168m • Average grant of $210,000 with half < $75,000 • Demand-driven model PPIAF Sub-National TA Program • Launched July 2007; 3-year pilot • $7m in first year (IFC, WB and DFID) • TA grants to help Sub-Nationals access market-based finance without sovereign guarantees • Sub-Nationals: local government units, SOEs, utilities and DFIs • Maintains traditional PPIAF characteristics: – demand driven – focus on infrastructure (but includes municipal financing) – governance & management structure – application, approval and monitoring – not tied to specific financiers or financing options SNTA Key Characteristics • Not PPPs or privatization • Promotes market-based borrowing – Improving creditworthiness helps mobilize infrastructure financing – Also promotes local financial markets
• Purpose of the financing
– Infrastructure project investment • Water & Sanitation, Energy, Transport – Implementing development strategies • City development strategies, slum upgrading strategies
• Clients can use own procurement rules
• No obligation to use a specific financing source Examples of activities under SNTA • Improving internal financial controls
• Developing a capital financing plan
• Improving corporate governance of a public enterprise
• Getting or improving a credit rating
• Structuring a project
• Developing innovative credit structures
• Preparing a bond or share issuance
Activities in East Asia and Pacific Infrastructure for Environment and Resource Management • Increasing urbanization – Greater infrastructure needs – Environmental and resource challenges affecting quality of life
• Improving infrastructure provision
– Efficient public transportation lessen emissions and improve air quality – Efficient water delivery and waste water treatment protect and conserve water resources – Improved sanitation and proper solid waste management services benefit the environment and quality of life
• Potential role of private sector in infrastructure financing and provision
VIETNAM: Ho Chi Minh City Metro Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) faces rapid urbanization and its accompanying challenges: worsened congestion, road safety and air pollution A rail-based mass rapid transit (MRT) system key component of HCMC’s transport strategy to meet travel demand and improve livability PPIAF grant helped review the options for private sector participation (PSP) and public–private partnerships (PPP) for the HCMC Metro Rail System Project – Framework for PSP – implementation and operations – Value-for-money analysis – Financing model of a preferred PPP approach – Stakeholder consultations, institutional and contractual arrangements ADB-task managed – Supplements an ADB Project Preparatory Technical Assistance loan PHILIPPINES: Solid Waste Management Subsidy Framework Financing is one of the major reasons why there is low compliance by LGUs with the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act Some counterpart grant funding from the NG needed to help LGUs undertake investment on solid waste management services (e.g. Sanitary Landfill) – Financing framework favors smaller and lower class LGUs but bulk of the SWM problems are borne by highly urbanized cities PPIAF grant helped NEDA and the SWM Commission develop an appropriate cost-sharing framework – NG counterpart funds now allotted for 1st and 2nd Class Cities (40% of investment cost) – Additional counterpart funds can be shouldered by the NG if LGUs form a cluster Framework adopted by Government and funds earmarked to operationalize the cost-sharing framework Steps being taken by Government to prepare detailed guidelines and criteria on accessing and use of the grant funding Potential follow-on PPIAF support to help pilot the cost-sharing arrangement VIETNAM: Ho Chi Minh City Non-Revenue Water Reduction PSP NRW a major issue for water utilities in developing nations
High NRW levels (av. 35%) affect financial viability of
utilities
PPIAF support to identify options for reducing NRW in
HCMC – Developed performance based contract (PBC) to reduce water loss by 10% or 125,000 m3 in six years
– Overall utility management to remain with Saigon
Water Company (SAWACO)
Follow-on activity to help SAWACO evaluate bids for
PBC – Capacity building for SAWACO to ensure selects most cost effective bidder with required technical capacity
– Competitive bidding with Manila Water successful (July
2008)
Similar NRW reduction activity undertaken for Hanoi
PHILIPPINES: Small Water Utilities Improvement and Financing Project Small Water Utilities (LGU-run, cooperatives) play large role in providing water outside Metro Manila Part of a larger initiative undertaken by the Water and Sanitation Program Philippines: Small Water Utilities Improvement and Financing Project (SWIF) – Improve performance, financial viability of small utilities and support them to increasingly access market-based financing in line with the Philippines water sector financing policy
With PPIAF-SNTA grant, consultants were hired to
assess financing needs and options for small water utilities – Rapid assessment reveals PFIs have little knowledge of small water utilities' business; exhibited only general and noncommittal interest – Strengthening utilities' financial management systems: Subsidiary account manual (to ring-fence water business accounts) was piloted in Antequera, Bohol
Ring-fencing piloted by the Philippine Water
Revolving Fund (USAID) in 6 LGUs and 3 GLOBAL: Knowledge Products GLOBAL: Urban Bus Toolkit Provides tools and options for reforming urban bus systems Active dissemination and training seminars bringing knowledge to practitioners and policy-makers Expert-designed country/city specific course material on practical aspects of implementing public bus and BRT services Translation of material into local languages (French, Chinese) Global delivery with presentations in 5 different regions – Manila – Bogota – Rabat – Washington, DC – Ghana Gridline: Organizing waste pickers to enhance their impacts For urban poor in developing countries, waste picking is one of the common ways to earn an income – Vulnerable groups – recent migrants, unemployed, the disabled, children and elderly – Daily contact with all kinds of wastes – posing risks to their health Organized waste picking can strengthen waste pickers’ welfare – Bargaining position with industry and government – Actors in the development process – Grassroots development Also generates economic and environment benefits – Broader source of income (waste pickers) and lower recycling costs (municipalities) – Contribute to national industrial competitiveness and greater recycling Models for organizing waste pickers – Micro enterprises – Cooperatives - e.g. ASMARE and COOPAMARE in Brazil – Public-private partnerships – e.g. in several Colombian cities, the municipality provides infrastructure and equipment while waste pickers provide labor PPIAF Regional Office for East Asia & Pacific (Manila): manilarco@ppiaf.org