Ahmad Faizul Faezah Bahari Khairul Ezani Maziah NurFauzuliyana Siti Salina Adapted from Jones, A. & Weas, L. (2009) PHENOMENOLOGY Adapted from Jones, A. & Weas, L. (2009) DEFINITION OF PHENOMENOLOGY Phenomenology is concerned with the study of experience from the perspective of the individual and usual ways of perceiving (Dermot Moran,2000)
As (Giorgi,1999) points out, phenomenography and phenomenology are qualitative approach, sharing an interest in experiences of phenomena AT A GLANCE Where as a narrative study reports the life of a single individual, a phenomenological study describes the meaning of several individuals of their lived experience Charisse Genevieve & Raph Julius PHENOMENOLOGY The study of the lived experience of persons Experience is a conscious process The development of essences of these experiences (interpretations) PHENOMENOLOGY METHODS Interviews Conversations Participant Observation Action Research Focus Meetings Analysis of personal text METHODS Purposive sampling (homogenous sample) Research question Sample/recruitment of participants Data collection -Semi structured, one-on-one interviews PURPOSE OF PHENOMENOLOGY RESEARCH Is to illuminate the specific, to identify phenomena through how they are perceived by the actors in a situation.
In the human sphere this normally translates info gating deep information and perceptions through inductive, qualitative methods such as: interviews, discussions, participant observations,
representing it from the perspective of the research participant(s).
PURPOSE OF PHENOMENOLOGY RESEARCH Phenomenology is concerned with the study of experience from the perspective of the individual, bracketing taken-for- granted assumptions and usual ways of perceiving. Phenomenology approaches are based in a paradigm of personal knowledge and subjectivity, and emphasize the importance of personal perspective and interpretation. TYPES OF PHENOMENOLOGY Types of Phenomenology Transcendental constitutive phenomenology Naturalistic constitutive phenomenology Existential phenomenology Generative historicist phenomenology Genetic phenomenology Hermeneutical phenomenology Realistic phenomenology
TYPES OF PHENOMENOLOGY
TRANSCENDENTAL CONSTITUTIVE PHENOMENOLOGY Studies how objects are constituted in pure or transcendental consciousness, setting aside questions of relation to the natural world around us.
NATURALISTIC CONSTITUTIVE PHENOMENOLOGY How consciousness constitutive or takes thing in the world of nature, assuming with the natural attitude that consciousness is part of nature.
EXISTENTIAL PHENOMENOLOGY
Studies concrete human existence, including our experience of free choice or action in concrete situations.
GENERATIVE HISTORICIST PHENOMENOLOGY
Studies how meaning, as found in our experience, is generated in historical processes of collective experience over time.
GENETIC PHENOMENOLOGY
Studies the genesis of meanings of things within ones stream of experience.
HERMENEUTICAL PHENOMENOLOGY
Studies interpretive structures of experience, how we understand and engage things around us in our human world, including ourselves and others.
REALISTIC PHENOMENOLOGY
Studies the structure of consciousness and intentionality, assuming it occurs in a real world that is largely external to consciousness and not somehow brought into being by consciousness. CHARACTERISTICS OF PHENOMENOLOGY 1.Emphasize a focus on peoples subjective experiences and interpretations of the world 2.Sometimes considered a school of thought or philosophical perspective. 3. To understand hour the world appears to others. 4.Analysis of experience. RESEARCH TOOL Interview & Multiple Interview Observation Oral Written Journals Music Poetry CHALLENGE OF PHENOMENOLOGY Bracketing personal experiences maybe difficult for researcher to implement (The researcher to become a separate from the text) The participants in the study need to be carefully chosen to be individuals who have all experienced the phenomenon in question. GROUNDED THEORY Adapted from Jones, A. & Weas, L. (2009) History of The Theory?
Grounded Theory: A specific methodology developed by Glaser and Strauss (1967) for the purpose of building theory from data. In their book the term grounded theory is used in the sense to denote theoretical constructs derived form qualitative analysis of data.
(Corbin & Strauss, 2008) What is Grounded Theory?
The aim of grounded theory is:
to generate or discover a theory (Glaser and Strauss, 1967)
Grounded theory may be defined as:
the discovery of theory from data systematically obtained from social research (Glaser and Strauss 1967: 2). When would you use it?
Focus of the methodology is uncovering basic social processes
Ideal for exploring integral social relationships and the behaviour of groups where there has been little exploration of the contextual factors that affect individuals lives.(Crooks 2001)
Called as constant comparative method(continual interplay the researcher, his or her data and the theory)
How to use GT?
Unlike many other qualitative methods we have some idea
how to start the research (identifying area of interest, avoiding theoretical preconceptions and using theoretical sensitivity)
how to do it (through analytical procedures and sampling strategies)
how to stop (when theoretical saturation is reached) (Dey 1999) Data collection methods all is data
In-depth interviews Most commonly used Relies on open ended questions Questions can be modified to reflect emerging theory
Observational methods
Interviews etc Over time, a grounded theory study works through the following mostly-overlapping phases.
THE GROUNDED THEORY PROCESS: (CHARMAZ) (Charmaz, 2006) Writing the first draft Integrating memos diagramming concepts Sorting memos Advanced memos refining conceptual categories Theoretical sampling seek specific new data Initial memos raising codes to tentative categories Research Problem and opening research questions Further theoretical sampling if needed Theoretical memo-writing and further refining of concepts Adopting certain categories as theoretical concepts Data Collection Focused Coding Sensitizing concepts and general disciplinary perspectives Initial coding data collection Re-examination of earlier data EXAMPLE OF RESEARCH Title : From Image to Text: Using Images in the Writing Process By : Nancy Andrzejczak, Guy Trainin, Monique Poldberg (Volume 6 Number 12 October 19, 2005)
EXAMPLE OF RESEARCH The article comprises the benefits of integrating visual art creation and the writing process.
This article discussed the integration and roles of metaphoric imagination in expressing a work of art.
The researcher focused on two targeted samples which are Jeremy and Wendy. Jeremy and Wendy were selected because they were engage with the Picturing Writing Sequence. They are familiar with the process.
The reasearcher focused on observation and interviews focusing on the two participants. The observer videotaped and took many evidences regarding the research.
EXAMPLE OF RESEARCH
The research based on in four category of data analysis, 1) motivational entry point 2) Observation of the work 3)Response to the finished work $) The creative process (while they do the artwork)
The researcher and the facilitator need to observe and critically analyse the finished artworks that have been created by the participants.
DATA COLLECTING DATA COLLECTING The Power of Pictures: Creating Pathways to Literacy Through Art Beth Olshansky, founder and director of the Center for the Advancement of Art-Based Literacy at the University of New Hampshire in Durham, has just completed a new book and companion DVD: The Power of Pictures: Creating Pathways to Literacy Through Art.
THE WEAKNESSES
Weaknesses in using the method have become equated with weaknesses inherent in the method (Charmaz 1990: 1164). Grounded theory has its own criteria for assessing the quality of the study (Glaser 1978): Fit and relevance - how well do the categories relate to the data and derives from constant comparison and conceptualisation of the data Workability refers to the integration of the categories into the core category that emerges Modifiability refers to ensuring that all the concepts that are important to the theory are incorporated into it by the constant comparison process. A modifiable theory can be altered when new relevant data is compared to existing data plausible stories (Strong 1979; Melia 1987). CONCLUSION GT advocates creating a new theory consisting of interrelated concepts rather than testing existing theories.
GT will be recommendation applies to any researcher in the hard science as well as the social science.