15
1
Effective Groups and Teams
Learning Objectives
After studying the chapter, you should be able to:
Explain why groups and teams are key contributors to
organizational effectiveness.
Identify the different types of groups and teams that help
15-3
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Groups, Teams and
Organizational Effectiveness
Team
A group whose members work intensely
with each other to achieve a specific,
common goal or objective. All teams are
groups but not all groups are teams.
Teams often are difficult to form.
It takes time for members to learn how to work
together.
15-4
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Groups and Teams as
Performance Enhancers
Performance Enhancement
Making use of the synergy from employees in a
group producing more or better output than
employees working separately.
Bounce ideas off one another.
Correct each other’s errors.
Bring more new ideas to bear on problems
Accomplish projects beyond the scope of individuals
15-7
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Teams and Innovation
Innovation
The creative development of new products, new
technologies, new services, or new organizational
structures
Individualsrarely possess the wide variety of skills
needed for successful innovation.
Team members can uncover each other’s flaws and
balance each other’s strengths and weaknesses
Managers should empower the team and make it
accountable for the innovation process.
15-8
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Groups and Teams as Motivators
Members of groups, and particularly teams, are
often better motivated and satisfied than
individuals.
Team members are more motivated and satisfied than if
they were working alone.
Team members can see the effect of their contribution to
achieving team and organizational goals.
Teams provide needed social interaction and help
employees cope with work-related stressors.
15-9
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
The Types of Groups and Teams
Formal Group
A group that managers establish to achieve
organization goals.
Informal Group
A group that managers or nonmanagerial
employees form to help achieve their own
goals or to meet their own needs.
15-10
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
The Types of Groups and Teams in
Organizations
Figure 15.2
15-11
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
The Types of Groups and Teams
Type of Team
Top-management A group composed of the CEO, the president,
team and the heads of the most important
departments
15-15
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Group Dynamics
Group Dynamics
The characteristics and processes that affect how a
group or team functions.
Group size affects how a group performs.
Normally, small groups (2 to 9 members) interact better and
tend to be more motivated.
Larger groups can be used when more resources are
needed and division of labor is possible.
Group tasks impact how a group interacts.
Task interdependence shows how the work of one member
impacts another; as interdependence rises, members must
work more closely together.
15-16
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Group Dynamics: Interdependence
Task Interdependence Types
Pooled
Members make separate, independent contributions to
group such that group performance is the sum of each
member’s contributions.
Sequential
Members perform tasks in a sequential order making it
difficult to determine individual performance since one
member depends on another.
Reciprocal
Work performed by one group member is mutually
dependent on work done by other members.
15-17
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Types of Task
Interdependence
15-19
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Group Leadership
Effectiveleadership is a key ingredient in
high performing groups, teams, and
organizations.
Formal groups created by an organization
have a leader appointed by the organization.
Groups that evolve independently in an
organization have an informal leader
recognized by the group.
15-20
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Stages of Group Development
Forming
Group members get to know each other and reach common
goals.
Storming
Group members disagree on direction and leadership.
Managers need to be sure the conflict stays focused.
Norming
Close ties and consensus begin to develop between group
members.
Performing
The group begins to do its real work.
Adjourning
Only for task forces that are temporary.
15-21
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
The Stages of Group Development
15-23
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Balancing
Conformity
and
Deviance in
Groups
Figure 15.5
15-24
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Group Cohesiveness
The degree to which members are
attracted to their group
Three major consequences
Level of participation
Level of conformity to group norms
Emphasis on group goal accomplishment
15-25
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Sources and Consequences of
Group Cohesiveness
15-27
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Managing Groups and Teams
for High Performance
Motivating group members to achieve
organizational goals:
Members should benefit when the group performs
well—rewards can be monetary or in other forms
such as special recognition.
Individual compensation is a combination of both
individual and group performance.
Make additional resources (beyond compensation)
such as choice assignments available to high-
performance groups.
15-28
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reser
Managing Groups and Teams
for High Performance
Social loafing
The human tendency to put forth less effort in a group than
individually.
Results in possibly lower group performance and failure to attain
group goals
Reducing social loafing:
Make individual efforts identifiable and accountable.
Emphasize the valuable contributions of individual members.
Keep group size at an appropriate level.