Brajesh Kumar (MP12015) Santosh K Singh (MP12063) Rakesh Agarwal (MP12054) Amit Bharti (MP12005) George Verghese (MP12021) Case Study Overview DEC was a company engaged in public distribution of electricity with $172M sales in last fiscal year. It planned for a major construction programme to expand customer base. Construction budget estimated at over $500 M with approximately 60% finance from internal resources. New capital investment requires the company to earn a reasonable rate of return for its capital providers. The above return must be decent enough to cover the cost of capital, also known as WACC. Challenges ahead for WACC Inflation, increasing wage cost and higher operating cost. Shareholders expectation Comparable earning, capital attraction and maintain credit standing. Case Study Overview contd
Computation of WACC has many inferences like using of different model for cost of equity and application of different weights (market or book or target). What is the most appropriate method to compute WACC.
Why the WACC Measures the returns demanded by all providers of capital Investments must offer this return to be worth using the capital providers money As an opportunity cost The rate of return investors could earn elsewhere on projects with the same risk and capital structure Methods for WACC Computation Cost of Equity Discounted Cash Flow Method (DCF) Capital Assets Pricing Model (CAPM) Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) using Book Value as weight Market Value as weight Target Value as weight Decide : Most Appropriate Method (MAM) for WACC
Cost of Equity DCF Method D1 = Do X (1+g) = 1.14 X 1.08 = 1.23 Po = 16.125
Cost of Equity (Ke) = [D1 / Po] + g = 1.23/16.125 + 0.08 = 15.61% Rm = Return on market portfolio = 13% Rf = Risk-free rate of return = 7.50% Beta = 0.90 Cost of Equity (Ke) = Rf + (Rm-Rf) X Beta = 7.50 + (13-7.50) X 0.90 = 12.45% Cost of Equity CAPM Method Calculation of Different Weights Component-wise Cost of Capital Cost of Preference Share (Kp) = Div. / Market Price (net of floatation cost) = 2 / 20 X 100 = 10%
Pretax Cost of Debt (Kd)= 8% WACC Computation (Book Value, Market Value & Target Value) MV Weight Vs BV Weight Provides better yardstick of investors expectations. Based on market sentiments and not affected by accounting entries in the books. Provides fair estimate of cost of capital in relation to listed corporations. Difficult to compute since market value is based on estimates and subject to different individual inferences.
Most Appropriate Method We recommend WACC (TARGET WEIGHT) for the following reasons
More dynamic compared to Market Weight and reciprocates the investor expectations in current market scenario after raising the new capital.
Target weights are management internal commitment which they need to achieve in the long run.
Target weight attempts to incorporate the risk profile of the firm in the industry, which in turn affects the WACC of the firm.
Ward A. Thompson v. City of Lawrence, Kansas Ron Olin, Chief of Police Jerry Wells, District Attorney Frank Diehl, David Davis, Kevin Harmon, Mike Hall, Ray Urbanek, Jim Miller, Bob Williams, Craig Shanks, John Lewis, Jack Cross, Catherine Kelley, Dan Ward, James Haller, Dave Hubbell and Matilda Woody, Frances S. Wisdom v. City of Lawrence, Kansas Ron Olin, Chief of Police David Davis, Mike Hall, Jim Miller, Bob Williams, Craig Shanks, John L. Lewis, Jack Cross, Kevin Harmon, Catherine Kelley, Dan Ward and James Haller, Jr., 58 F.3d 1511, 10th Cir. (1995)
The Conflict With Slavery and Others, Complete, Volume VII, The Works of Whittier: The Conflict With Slavery, Politicsand Reform, The Inner Life and Criticism by Whittier, John Greenleaf, 1807-1892