0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
212 tayangan19 halaman
This document summarizes an ice cream market case study on the competition between Nestle and Unilever, who together control one third of the $57 billion global ice cream market. It outlines their acquisition campaigns of premium brands over the 1990s and 2000s to grow their market shares. Both companies derive around 20% of revenues from ice cream and have profited greatly from the growing, profitable industry, especially in Asia which offers opportunities for further expansion. The case raises discussion questions around why ice cream is attractive, pros and cons of focusing on premium products, and Asia's appeal for these companies.
Deskripsi Asli:
The Presentation for a case study in the Strategic Management course provided
This document summarizes an ice cream market case study on the competition between Nestle and Unilever, who together control one third of the $57 billion global ice cream market. It outlines their acquisition campaigns of premium brands over the 1990s and 2000s to grow their market shares. Both companies derive around 20% of revenues from ice cream and have profited greatly from the growing, profitable industry, especially in Asia which offers opportunities for further expansion. The case raises discussion questions around why ice cream is attractive, pros and cons of focusing on premium products, and Asia's appeal for these companies.
This document summarizes an ice cream market case study on the competition between Nestle and Unilever, who together control one third of the $57 billion global ice cream market. It outlines their acquisition campaigns of premium brands over the 1990s and 2000s to grow their market shares. Both companies derive around 20% of revenues from ice cream and have profited greatly from the growing, profitable industry, especially in Asia which offers opportunities for further expansion. The case raises discussion questions around why ice cream is attractive, pros and cons of focusing on premium products, and Asia's appeal for these companies.
Case abstract Case abstract USD57 billion industry Nestle & Unilever account for 1/3 of the market, the rest are highly fragmented Growing and profitable industry with increasing sales in different markets 2 giants started their head-to-head war since the 1990s
Key points Acquisition Campaigns Nestle Unilever obtained the rights to sell Hagen-Dazs in the U.S. and Canada; bought Mvenpick
17.5% share of the world market gobbled up Ben & Jerry's; acquired Breyers Ice Cream
16% share of the world market Similarities Super premium products Health consciousness Asia Pacific region: the biggest growth prospect Discussion questions 1)Why is the ice cream business so attractive for Nestle and Unilever? The ice cream sale in the world is $59 billion, Western Europe: $21.5 billion, North Americans: $16.3 billion worth Ice cream business is in a growing and profitable business Global ice cream sales are rising 2.5% annually and will hit $65 billion in 2010. In China and Brazil, the annual sales are soaring 8.5% and 8%, respectively. Nestl took over Hagen-Dazs, Dreyer's, and Swiss brand Mvenpick. Unilever bought Breyers Ice Cream and Ben & Jerry's. Today, Nestl reached a 17.5% share of the world market, while Unilever is close behind with 16%. Profit in first-half 2007 Nestle Unilever nearly 20% of its $42 billion revenues come from milk products and ice cream division $900 million in profits ice cream and beverages division supplied just over 20% of its $26.7 billion\
ice cream alone accounted for 10% of Unilever's $3 billion 2)What are the pros and cons of focusing on the super premium ice cream category? Benefits Highly fragmented market => boost differentiation of products Dreyers Grand Ice (Nestl); Ben & Jerrys (Unilever) are famous for lower-fat and lower- calories => fit for Health Consciousness trend Better reputation Take advantage of existed customers
Problems Highly fragmented market, there are too many competitors => customer loyalty is not high, can not satisfy every nations demand, esp. Chinese market Hidden competitors occupy nearly 65% of the market => high risk of losing customers Huge profit and revenue come from super premium ice-cream => high financial risk 3)What attraction does Asia have for Nestle and Unilever? Asian market penetration remains low
The increasing globalization
Tropical climate countries
High young population Recommendation For supper premium ice-cream segment - New types - Focus differentiation - New supplier & technology to reduce cost For expanding in Asian market - New flavour - Acquire local business Q & A Thank you