THE CASE OF INDONESIA By Syndicate 10, September 16 th , 2014 Presented by : Frans Joflin Panggabean (29114766) Karina Larasati (29114721) Lina Setiawati (29114748) Marnala Joshua Hutajulu (29114880)
Problem Identification and Study Objective Public Accountants Moral Dilemma Self-Interest or Client- Interest Public Interest Study objective : to explore perception of Indonesian financial managers as user towards moral reasoning in influencing the implementation of ethical codes Moral Development Level 1 Preconventional Morality Level 2 Conventional Morality Level 3 PostConventional Morality Stage 1 : Physical Consequences of Actions and Avoidance Stage 2 : Satisfaction of Ones Own Needs Stage 3 : Desire to Please Others Stage 4 : Respecting Authority and Preseving the Rules of Society Stage 5 : Morality of Contracts, Individual Rights, and Democratically Accepted Law Stage 6 : Universal Moral and Ethical Principle Moral Reasoning Reasoning : To produce rationalization for our behaviors To correct our intuitions and leads us to reevaluate our judgements and decisions
Moral Reasoning : Arguments about how people should act or reason to justify or criticize behavior Has objective for explaining the process of individuals ethical decision-making Influenced by levels of an individuals moral development
The higher the individual moral development, the higher ones level of moral reasoning Method : Qualitative Research Target : 15 Financial Managers & Internal Auditors Technique Analysis : Cross-Case Study Approach : AICPA & Kohlbergs model Research Design Variables and Measurement Relationship between 2 Approaches Findings Auditor Selection Criteria of the Interviewees Independence and Objectivity (Summary)
Integrity (Summary) Responsibility (Summary) Due Care (Summary) Scope and Service (Summary) 1. The study relate to moral development on the basis of the moral reasoning process 2. The study relate to the level of moral reasoning as moral agent 3. The study relate to the key activities by Indonesian public accountants and the financial manager 4. The study relate to the establishment and improvement of ethics codes Finding Summary Most violation towards ethical codes primarily occurred in FOC, then followed by SOC Study Analysis Professional Approach No significant infringement related to ethical codes in FrOC
5 Assumptions : 1. Lack of understanding about ethical standards 2. The auditors failed to grasp the purpose of ethical code standards 3. The auditors take advantage from companies which lack of know-how about public accountants ethical codes 4. The standards might not be appropriate to be implemented in Indonesia 5. Any collusion, cronyism, and nepotism, including in the government institutions
Assumption : It has knowledgeable people in accounting and financial area
Study Analysis Individual Approach 4 Assumptions : Light sanction Earn more respect as well as self- serving Responsive to client Adopt social rule People who work in financial area should have substantial knowledge The auditors should choose work based on professionalism, not biggest fee Shorten contract period between company and auditor IAI must determine minimum standards of professional public accountants and take action by exercising proper sanctions for those who break the rule Adjust local regulation to the expectation of global community Government should create regulation as well as execute firm punishment Study Analysis - Recommendations IAI needs to formulate a clear statement of punishment Provide a good sysrem of court process Review existing ethical codes
Professional Approach Individual Approach Conclusion 2 elements of analysis : Professional and Individual Approach Moral reasoning plays an important role to influence ethical awareness in public accountants It is necessary to develop ethical codes and effective compliance monitoring system for Indonesia