pengobatan seorang penderita Dr. Moch. Maroef, SpOG FK UMM Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) Menggunakan segala pertimbangan bukti ilmiah (evidence) yang sahih yang diketahui hingga kini untuk menentukan pengobatan pada penderita yang sedang kita hadapi. Merupakan penjabaran bukti ilmiah lebih lanjut setelah obat dipasarkan dan seiring dengan pengobatan rasional. What is the level (L) of evidence ? (TGA) L1a. Randomized controlled trial (best evidence) L1b. Meta-analysis (pros and cons) L2. Retrospective analysis (case-control studies) L2. Prospective follow-up (cohort studies) Cross-sectional population (prevalence studies) Previous reviews (position statements) Clinical interventions (non-randomized)
Safety data (important element !) A comprehensive evaluation of all data is the best approach! How is LoE implemented in Recommendation Guidelines? (1) Levels of Evidence for Heart Failure:
A. Data derived from multiple RCTs. B. Data derived from a single randomized trial or non-randomized studies. C. Consensus opinion of experts was the primary source of recommendation. www.guidelines.gov/ How is LoE implemented in Recommendation Guidelines? (2) Strength of Recommendation: Class I: Conditions for which there is evidence/general agreement that a given procedure/therapy is useful and effective. Class II: Condition for which there is conflicting evidence or divergence of opinion about the usefulness /efficacy of performing the procedure /therapy. Class IIa: in favor of usefulness Class IIb: usefulness is less well established Class III:Condition for which there is evidence/general agreement that a procedure/therapy is not useful/effective and may be harmful. www.guidelines.gov/ How is LoE implemented in Recommendation Guidelines? (3) The strength of evidence does not necessarily reflect the strength of recommendation. A treatment may be considered controversial although it has been evaluated in CTs; conversely, a strong recommendation may be based on years of clinical experience and be supported only by historical data or by no data at all. Disini conflict of interest dari penilai dijaga ketat!! www.guidelines.gov/ Drug Safety in increased focus around the world Increasing number of drug withdrawals because of harmful effects (recently: Prepulsid, Posicor, Hismanal, Rezulin, Lipobay, etc). Scientific report on epidemic proportions of serious ADRs in hospitalized patients. (Lazarou, JAMA 1998) Medical mistakes (45.000 deaths/annually) and medication errors (28%) are reported, including under-utilization of proven drug therapies. (US Institute of Medicine, 2001) Bagaimana dokter bisa mengerti EBM ? Evidence perlu diterapkan pada penderita dg segala penyakit/komplikasi-nya. Evidence berubah menurut perkem- bangan ilmu.
Perlu CME model baru untuk men- sosialisasikan pengetahuan baru ini. Forum seminar biasa tidak lagi adekuat. Pengobatan profesional membutuhkan paradigma baru dalam CME. The Knowledge Filter (H.H. Bauer, 1995) Primary literature How much is incorrect? Correction of errors Much of it is correct (adapted) Untuk menunjang EBM, FDA telah melakukan perubahan label indikasi obat sewaktu ijin pemasaran melalui undang-undang. Misalnya: Indikasi antibiotik yang luas, seperti untuk upper respiratory tract infection, terdiri dari banyak lokasi yang kuman penyebab maupun antibiotiknya berbeda. Bagaimana interpretasi hasil Lab yg tidak pas? Nilai Widal yg dipakai untuk diagnosis tifus. SGPT yg merupakan surrogate endpoint. Hasil antibiogram yg mengikutsertakan AB yg tidak semestinya: gentamicin (tidak pas) untuk kuman tifus, tidak mengikutsertakan AB terpilih seperti flukloksasilin, dikloksasilin atau penisilin G untuk Staph. aureus atau stretokokkus, tapi menyertakan berbagai sefalosporin,... dsb. Lalu, bagaimana dg evidence pengobatan empirik yg tidak ada uji klinik formal, tetapi sangat berguna? Varisella: cukup mandi teratur, tidak perlu AB rutin Parotitis epidemika: cukup permen karet. Dikloksasilin atau flukloksasilin untuk staph. resisten, juga penisilin prokain tidak dipakai lagi. Probenesid (dosis kecil) telah dilupakan untk gout, walaupun 65% merupakan masalah ekskresi asam urat (alopurinol di-indikasikan untk masalah pembentukan urat {35%}). Case: Yn. 18 yrs with Grand Mal for 14 years since 4 yrs old. 2-4 convulsions a day with coma now and then, but now controlled. Evidence? Anticonvulsant blood levels were: daily dose blood l. norm. range (mcg/ml) - Dilantin 400 mg 1.57 /10-20/ - Luminal 200 mg 30.19 /15-40/ - Carbzepine 200 mg 1.97 /4-10/ Masalah terbesar ialah bahwa evidence dapat diartikan berbeda-beda menurut setiap orang atau profesi.
FDA Industri Dokter Spesialis Farmasis Herbalis Naturo- patis Awam dsb. EBM menjembatani Ilmu Kedokteran dan Hukum ? EBM mulai dibutuhkan juga oleh seorang hakim menentukan apakah suatu pengobatan tertentu sudah benar dalam persidangan. Diperlukan ilmu (evidence) di belakang pertimbangan suatu testimoni seorang saksi ahli. (JAMA Vol. 283 No.21, June 2000) Juga, EBM menentukan harga saham pabrik obat, yang disebarkan mass media ekonomi. Namun, masih akan dijumpai berbagai kendala, karena ilmu pengobatan dan EBM sendiri tidak sesederhana itu. EBM is challenged by the very presence of neutraceuticals While orthodox medicine is requiring stricter use of drugs by scientific evidence, unrestricted availability of alternative methods and medicines are worldwide - most without even any evidence of efficacy and safety - at a price that surpass new pharmaceuticals. EBM is perhaps not always applicable for many reasons: Some times we cannot treat just the numbers. Other times we cannot use statistics to treat a specific patient. Large outcome studies includes patients with uncontrollable variables. Controlled clinical trials are not always flawless. Pediatric CTs have not been required until 1998, although compulsory for adults since 1962. Dose-finding studies are rare, not the least in pediatrics. Ultimately: ask 3 specialists and you will get 2-3 different answers. Equipoise of opinions should perhaps be set at around 70 : 30, or more. Conclusion Proper drug use should be promoted nationally. Education on drugs and EBM must take a different approach (not education by coercive, pharmaceutical marketing needs). The cause of irrationalism is linked with a perpetuating error in a larger (health) system. Health and DrugUsePolicy must be established. If the Health Department is failing, universities and the profession should - morally - take initiative.