recognized as a problem in the first half of the 20th century.
Various countries introduced national regulations to control discharges of oil within their territorial waters. EVOLUTION In 1954, the United Kingdom organized a conference on oil pollution which resulted in the adoption of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution of the Sea by Oil (OILPOL), 1954.
OILPOL Entered into force on 26 July 1958
Amendments in 1962, 1969 and 1971
OBJECTIVE Attempted to Tackle the problem of pollution of the seas by oil - crude oil, fuel oil, heavy diesel oil and lubricating oil in two main ways.
The 2 ways PROHIBITED ZONES 50M FROM NEAREST LAND + DISCHARGE OF OIL <100PPM CONTRACTING PARTIES - SHORE RECEPTION FACILITIES FOCUS.. The 1954 Convention, primarily addressed pollution resulting from routine tanker operations and from the discharge of oily wastes from machinery spaces - regarded as the major causes of oil pollution from ships.
ALTERNATIVE Although the 1954 OILPOL Convention went some way in dealing with oil pollution, growth in oil trade and developments in industrial practices were beginning to make it clear that further action, was required. THE DISASTER In 1967, the tanker Torrey Canyon ran aground while entering the English Channel and spilled her entire cargo of 120,000 tons of crude oil into the sea. This resulted in the biggest oil pollution incident ever recorded up to that time. SETTING THE SCENE The ship Left Kuwait, 19 February 1967 with full cargo of oil, bound for the Atlantic ocean. Reached Canary Isles 14 March 1967 Informed of destination - Milford Haven, by 18/Mar/1967 Because of the size of the ship, they had to catch the high tide at 11.00 p.m., or wait 6 days more. They had to be at the entrance by 6.00 p.m. on 18 March. AT SCILLY ISLES 'Torrey Canyon' approaching the Scilly Isles on the morning of the disaster. The sketch is a map of the south-western end of Great Britain and shows the position of the 'Torrey Canyon' when this part of the story starts. The gap between the Scilly Isles and Land's End is about 20 miles; the gap between the Scilly Isles and Milford Haven is about 200 miles. Captain went to bed the night before at 03.30 a.m., with instructions to be woken at 6.00 a.m. Captain woken at 06.00 a.m., Scilly Isles still not in radar view (the radar had a range of 40 miles). Captain decides to sleep some more. Captain woken again at 06.30 a.m. Scilly Isles now on the radar scope, but on Port side, not to Stbd. After short discussion, captain orders "continue course" 07.00 a.m., Captain on bridge 0800 a.m., Changeover of the watch: captain, junior officer (1st trip) + experienced helmsman now on the bridge. Junior officer assigned navigation duties. Helmsman on watch on bridge wings. 08.15 a.m. Torrey Canyon is now passing the Scilly Isles, 30 minutes to Seven Stones reef . Captain orders a course alteration while on autopilot THE PROGRESSION There are reefs all round Land's End and round the Scilly Isles (look at all the lighthouses). Two particularly dangerous ones are 'Wolf Rock', and 'Seven Stones'. 'Wolf Rock' has a lighthouse; 'Seven Stones' has a lightship.
The Captain planned to sail between the Scilly Isles and the 'Seven Stones'. This channel is 7 miles wide. The tide then was running Port to Stbd, and the reef was submerged. Fishing vessels in channel; captain alters to Stbd of channel (closer to the 'Seven Stones' reef) to avoid the nets. 08.40 a.m. They discover a plotting error; quickly, they re-plot their position; now, they discover they are only 2.8 miles from the edge of the reef
Helmsman at the wheel - hurried course change to North. Autopilot switched to manual steering steer new course back onto autopilot to listen for the clicks Re-plot position - still heading for reef Emergency course change to 340 degrees (about North-west). Steering Changed over to manual mode. Position rechecked. Captain goes into the chartroom at the back of the bridge to look again at the chart. Helmsman shouts that vessel not steering.
Captain decides that the fuses have blown (this had happened before); opens fuse box and checks them. Fuses OK; therefore the oil pumps that move the rudder must be at fault (this too had happened before) Captain rings the engine room to get the pumps checked; by mistake, he dials the wrong number and gets the galley. The cook picks up the phone and says, "Oh, captain, your breakfast is ready." Captain glances at the autopilot control lever; realises what the problem is; moves the lever to manual, changes course THE END GAME Too late- At 17 knots, Torrey Canyon hits Pollard's Rock in the Seven Stones reef, and rips open 6 tanks. Over the next few weeks, all the oil escaped and spread along the shores of the south coast of England and the Normandy coast of France. There were no plans to combat this; it was the first of the big oil disasters, and what was attempted was either too late, too small in scope, or made matters worse. But much was learnt from this disaster.
LOST TORREY CANYON BROKEN INTO TWO HALVES THE REACTION The incident raised questions about measures then in place to prevent oil pollution from ships. It also exposed deficiencies in the existing system for providing compensation following accidents at sea.
RESPONSE IMO called an Extraordinary session of its Council, which drew up a plan of action on technical and legal aspects of the Torrey Canyon incident. Then, the IMO Assembly decided in 1969 to convene an international conference in 1973 to prepare a suitable international agreement for placing restraints on the contamination of the sea, land and air by ships.
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION Finally, an international Conference in 1973 adopted the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships. FOCUS ON OPERATIONAL POLLUTION CHEMICAL POLLUTION HARMFUL SUBSTANCE IN PACKAGES SEWAGE GARBAGE DELAY.. The 1973 Convention required ratification by 15 States, with a combined merchant fleet of not less than 50 percent of world shipping by gross tonnage, to enter into force. By 1976, it had only received three ratifications Jordan, Kenya and Tunisia representing less than one percent of the world's merchant shipping fleet. DELAY.. This was despite the fact that States could become Party to the Convention by only ratifying Annexes I (oil) and II (chemicals). Annexes III to V, covering harmful goods in packaged form, sewage and garbage, were optional.
It began to look as though the 1973 Convention might never enter into force, despite its importance.
1978 conference In response to a spate of tanker accidents in 1976-1977, IMO held a Conference on Tanker Safety and Pollution Prevention in February 1978. The conference adopted measures affecting tanker design and operation.
1978 conference Measures were incorporated in to the 1973 International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (1978 MARPOL Protocol) adopted on 17 February 1978.
The 1978 MARPOL Protocol allowed States to become Party to the Convention by first implementing Annex I (oil), as it was decided that Annex II (chemicals) would not become binding until three years after the Protocol entered into force.
This gave States time to overcome technical problems in Annex II, which for some had been a major obstacle in ratifying the Convention
MARPOL1973/78 As the 1973 Convention had not yet entered into force, the 1978 MARPOL Protocol absorbed the parent Convention. The combined instrument - the International Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Ships, 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL 73/78) - finally entered into force on 2 October 1983 (for Annexes I and II).
SIGNIFICANCE The adoption of the MARPOL Convention in 1973 was an important step in focusing the shipping industry's attention on the environment.
It was no longer enough just to ensure goods and people were transported safely Consideration for the environment was now on the agenda.
IMPACT MARPOL The Convention includes regulations aimed at preventing and minimizing pollution from ships - both accidental pollution and that from routine operations .
Currently includes SIX technical Annexes ANNEXES Annex I - Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Oil Annex II -Regulations for the Control of Pollution by Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk Annex III-Prevention of Pollution by Harmful Substances Carried by Sea in Packaged form ANNEXES Annex IV-Prevention of Pollution by Sewage from Ships
Annex V - Prevention of Pollution by Garbage from Ships
Annex VI-Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships POSSIBLE FUTURE ANNEXES UNWANTED AQUATIC ORGANISM IN BALLAST WATER