Presented By:
Naveen Jaiswal-Highway Engineer
Date: 26.08.2014
Tender Accepted
11.10.2013
Negotiation Meeting
15.10.2013
Letter of Intent
01.11.2013
14.11.2013
Time Period
6 Months
Inception Report
Submitted
Traffic Report
Submitted
Feasibility Report
Submitted
Submitted
Report
Progress
Inception report
Traffic surveys
Feasibility Report
Submitted on 26.03.2014.
Project feasible subject to availability of land
Minutes of Meeting received on 21.07.2014 instructing to submit
revised feasibility report
Revised Feasibility
Report
1.
2.
Background
3.
4.
Objectives
5.
6.
Proposal
7.
8.
Poonamalle
Road
Kaliamman
Street
Study Corridor
1. Link Road Connecting Kaliamman
Street to Poonamalle Road via
Nerkundram Road in Chennai.
1.
2. Road encroachments.
3. Road side Parking/halting/stopping.
1. Large
number
of
commercial
establishments
and
1.
2. Remove Bottlenecks
3. No/min Disturbance to road side properties
4. Mobility for all Pedestrian, NMT and 2 wheeler.
This alignment starts at the Kaliamman koil Street-Project Road junction and
follows the existing alignment upto Chainage 1170 and then passes through open
land along the Metro Depot and finally meets the Poonamalle High Road.
The total length of the proposal is about 1770 m
This alignment takes off from Kaliamman koil Street-market Road Junction and
follows the Market Road upto chainage 1375 and then realigns at the project road
upto chainage 1870 and the follows the Alternative 1A upto Poonamalle. Steep
curves and serpentine stretch have been avoided.
This alignment takes off from Kaliamman koil Street-market Road Junction
and then follows alternative 1B as it passes through open land along the Metro
Depot and finally meets at Poonamalle.
The total length of the alignment is 1753m
PROPOSAL
Proposed
Cross section
SL.
NO
PARAMETERS
Technical Parameters
i Total Length
1753 m
50 kmph
Environmental Parameters
i Proposed Right of Way
ii Area of Land to be acquired
20 m
17500 sqm
76
33
Merits
1. It is smaller in Length as compared to other proposals.
2. Land Acquisition will be least.
3. 4-lane elevated corridor to ease the traffic congestion
Demerits
1. Cost of the proposal is highest
2. Integration with existing alignment is not possible
proposed proposal.
position.
The alignment passes through the built up area and hence at grade
may increase the demolition which may be avoided in case of
elevated proposal.
THANK YOU
VKS INFRATECH MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD.
Consulting Engi neers Planners & Managers