H.Fischer/L.Florean/A.Richel
050602 (1) ISHO handover issues in CM mode INTERNAL V2.5.ppt
Communication
Impact on network
Solution plan:
solved and verified in field for VDF-D2 (15.11.04)
Short description
Case2: 14.4.04: Nokia indicated during drive testing in Vodafone network HO
failures in compressed mode: 3G ->2G ISHO - 88% success rate. 2/17 tests failed.
1 dropped call and 1 error in connection.
NodeB does not deactivate compressed mode, i.e. downlink frames are sent with
compressed mode still active. The CRCs are mainly not correct and this causes
UL SIR target increasing (OLPC) and consequently UE gets to its max power. The
speech quality in UL path decreases and sometimes the call is released.
Solution in UMR30.10A with NBL9_54_3
Short description:
15.12.04: VDF-D2 KPI testing in Berlin with Motorola UE and UMR30.10. The UE
asks frequently to de-activate and activate the compressed mode respecting the
parameters set by the system, e.g. time to trigger. Very often this results in a call
drop. FEKAT DA4576
Analysis:
The current NodeB implementation does not allow to activate the radio link
reconfiguration procedure (RAB assignment handling or Activation of compressed
mode) during the deactivation of the compress mode
When the Commit message is received by the NodeB before the activation time
expires, a double radio link failure is triggered.
Consequently the RNC deletes the Radio links and the UE has to send a Cell
Update (Cause: RL-Failure) to re-establish the call. This causes around 8 seconds
of missing voice
The RNC should not ask NB to activate CM mode again, during a pending
procedure of de-activation.
A partial solution for UMR3.5 could be to use different -values for activation time
for activating and de-activating CM mode (currenty 128 frames)
128 frames is quite long and takes into account long processing time of NodeB
RNC
Terminal
NodeB
NB in compressed mode
UE in compressed mode
RNC orders NB to
go to CM mode at
CFN x-
NB shall go in CM
mode, while
removing CM mode
is still in progress
Activation time
UE requests
compress mode
CFN=x-
CFN=x
10
Event2f:
-threshold -96 rscp
-HysteresisInterFreq 4
-TimeToTrigger 640 ms
Event2d:
-threshold -98 rscp
-HysteresisInterFreq 4
-TimeToTrigger 200 ms
Event3a:
-threshold -102 rscp
-HysteresisInterFreq 0
-TimeToTrigger 60 ms
Event2f:
-threshold -92 rscp
-HysteresisInterFreq 4
-TimeToTrigger 1280 ms
Event2d:
-threshold -98 rscp
-HysteresisInterFreq 4
-TimeToTrigger 200 ms
Event3a:
-threshold -102 rscp
-HysteresisInterFreq 0
-TimeToTrigger 60 ms
Event2f:
-threshold -95 rscp
-HysteresisInterFreq 4
-TimeToTrigger 640 ms
Event2d:
-threshold -99 rscp
-HysteresisInterFreq 4
-TimeToTrigger 640 ms
Event3a:
-threshold -102 rscp
-HysteresisInterFreq 0
-TimeToTrigger 60 ms
11
UE RLC
Last TB including the Poll bit
may be corrupted as the
previous TBs. Delay over the
air 40 ms one TTI per direction.
The UE does usually respond
the ACK without any extra
delay.
NodeB
NodeB:
ToAws 30ms+
processing 40ms
Tpoll = 260 ms
NodeB:
ToAws 30ms+
processing 40ms
120 ms
NodeB: Processing 9ms
12
RNC RLC
70 ms
9 ms
120 ms
70 ms
9 ms
RLC receives ack
Sum: 658 ms
13
28.2.05
Motorola sends analysis to VDF, that the RNC randomly sends the wrong
transmission gap CFN (TGCFN) numbers to the mobile
Analysis:
Normally needs about 50 tentatives of CM de-act/act. To trigger the problem, in
that case, the RNC sends the previous activation time A (instead the new one
B)
Traces exist, where this happens also during the 1st activation of CM mode.
Here it is unclear, from where the value a is derived
Status:
17.5.05
14
Terminal
NodeB
Measurement Report 2d
Synch. RL-Reconfig.Prep.
Synch. RL-Reconfig.Prep.
PhysicalChannelReconfigurationComplete
MeasurementControl
UE starts loosing
synchronization
15
The UE condition explains, why it depends on the actual values of A and B, if the
call drops
We have traces, where the RNC sends the wrong TGCFNs, but the UE handles it
16
17
Short description:
23.3.04:
VF-D2 issues RFI405 for the feature and proves (via Nokia implementation) a
1..2% less drop rate. Siemens issues CR754 released in UMR35.08 patch 648
Many UEs as Qualcomm chipset based 6200, 6250 (Z107, option fusion card)
do not support the implementation
Impact on network:
18.5.05:
If the feature is activated, the calls will drop with the (majority) of UEs not
supporting it
Motorola, Ericsson, Nokia UEs support our implementation???
Analysis:
18.5.05:
RNC configures 2 measurement control commands e3a (one for Ec/No, one for
RSCP), not including the GSM neighbor list in the second one
This implementation is 3GPP 25.331 compliant (2nd list is optional)
Qualcomm chipset based UEs require the second neighbor list
CR1093 issued to overcome UE limitation, however not yet approved
18
NodeB
UE
19