Anda di halaman 1dari 45

BABELUNITY

NOAH’S BLOOD LINEAGE

GENESIS 5

 Adam—Seth
 Seth—Enos
 Enos—Cainan
 Cainan—Mahalaleel
 Mahalaleel—Jared
 Jared—Enoch
 Enoch—Methuselah
 Methuselah—Lamech
 Lamech—Noah
NOAH’S FAMILY TREE

GENESIS 9:8, 9, 18

 GOD’S COVENANT WITH NOAH

 THREE SONS OF NOAH

GENESIS 10:9

 HAMS’ FOUR SONS

 CUSH BEGAT NIMROD


BABEL’S
BABELUNITY—NIMROD

GENESIS 10:8-11; 11:1-3

POINTS TO PONDER: BABEL


 NIMROD
1. DELEGATE
2. INITIATE
3. ACTIVATE

 BABEL—FOUNDATION
1. BRICK—STONE
2. SLIME—MORTAR
ONE-WORLD RELIGION:
ECUMENISM

GENESIS 11:1 & GENESIS 6:1-5

 PEOPLE: UNITY—REBELLION
 PEOPLE: UNITY—LANGUAGE
 PEOPLE: UNITY—SPEECH
 PEOPLE: UNITY—UNION
 PEOPLE: UNITY—INFAMY
 PEOPLE: UNITY—RELIGION
 PEOPLE: UNITY—PURPOSE
NIMROD’S UNITED NATIONS

NOTE:
UNDER NIMROD’S LEADERSHIP,
REBELLION, APOSTASY AND APATHY
BECAME MUCH EASIER IN LIGHT OF
GENESIS 3:15.

“PESSIMISTS SEE DIFFICULTIES IN


THEIR OPPORTUNITIES. OPTIMISTS
SEE OPPORTUNITIES IN THEIR
DIFFICULTIES.”
BIG DEAL! WHAT’S IN
NIMROD’S NAME…?

NIMROD—HEBREW: “REBELLION”

 ANCIENT BIBLE NAMES DEPICT THE


CHARACTERS OF THE PERSON.

 C.I.P: DELILAH-BARJESUS-JACOB

GENESIS 11:4
 SELFISHNESS & REBELLION
Chap. 10 - The Tower of Babel
{P&P, 119}

God had directed men to disperse


throughout the earth, to replenish
and subdue it; but these Babel
builders determined to keep their
community united in one body, and
to found a monarchy that should
eventually embrace the whole earth.
Thus their city would become the
metropolis of a universal empire; …
…The magnificent tower, reaching to
the heavens, was intended to stand
as a monument of the power and
wisdom of its builders, perpetuating
their fame to the latest generations.
The dwellers on the plain of Shinar
disbelieved God's covenant that He
would not again bring a flood upon
the earth. Many of them denied the
existence of God and attributed the
Flood to the operation of natural
causes. Others believed in a
Supreme Being, and that it was He
who had destroyed the antediluvian
world;…
…One object before them in the
erection of the tower was to secure
their own safety in case of another
deluge. By carrying the structure to
a much greater height than was
reached by the waters of the Flood,
they thought to place themselves
beyond all possibility of danger. And
as they would be able to ascend to
the region of the clouds, they hoped
to ascertain the cause of the Flood…
…When the tower had been partially
completed, a portion of it was
occupied as a dwelling place for the
builders; other apartments,
splendidly furnished and adorned,
were devoted to their idols.
{P&P, 119}
EXCERPTS FROM THE BOOK:
“TOO LONG IN THE SUN”

WILL THE REAL SUN GOD PLEASE


STAND UP?
BEL-NIMROD, THAMMUZ, BAAL,
MERODACH, SHAMASH, ATTIS, RA,
APOLLO, HELIOS, MITHRA: IT MAKES
NO DIFFERENCE WHAT YOU CALL
SATAN AS LONG AS WORSHIP HIM. IF
YOU BELIEVE IN MANY gods: NO
PROBLEM, JUST MAKE HIM THE
CHIEF. IF YOU BELIEVE IN ONE god:
NO PROBLEM, JUST ALLOW HIM TO
BE MEDIATOR BETWEEN MAN AND
GOD AND THE WAY OF SALVATION.
GENESIS 3:5

FOR GOD DOTH KNOW THAT IN THE


DAY YE EAT THEREOF, THEN YOUR EYES
SHALL BE OPENED, AND YE SHALL BE
AS gods, KNOWING GOOD AND EVIL.

DEIFICATION OF MONARCHS: NIMROD


 BILU NIPRU OR BEL NIMROD

 TEMPLES—THE EAST

 TEMPLES: SUN—BELUS

 SHRINES: EGYPTIANS—SUN
MANY—gods—ONE CHIEF

NOTE:
BETIS, THE WIFE OF BEL-NIMROD
AND MOTHER OF SUPPOSED SON
NIN, WAS WORSHIPPED AS THE
“MOTHER OF GOD”. THAT CAME BY
WAY OF THE REINCARNATION OF
BEL-NIMROD AS NIN: MAKING NIN
HIS MOTHER’S HUSBAND.
ANY CONNECTIONS BETWEEN
THE LAND OF SHINAR AND
CHALDEA?
GENESIS 11:2
 WHERE IS THE GEOGRAPHICAL
LOCATION OF SHINAR & CHALDEA?

DANIEL 1:1, 2
 WHO WAS KING NEBUCHADNEZZAR?
 WHERE HAD NEBUCHADNEZZAR
TAKEN HIS CAPTIVES TO?

NOTE: GENESIS 6:1-7 & GENESIS 11:1-4


ARE IDENTICAL
ECCLESIASTES 8:11

POINTS TO PONDER: BABYLON

 NEBUCHADNEZZAR
1. ENFORCER OF BABEL CONCEPT
2. FOLLOWER OF BABEL’S TRADITION
3. KING MANDATES IDOL WORSHIP

DANIEL 1:1-21 & 3:1-18 [CHANGE: A DIET OF


IDEAS]

 NEBUCHADNEZZAR RE-ESTABLISHES THE


FOUNDATIONAL STRUCTURE OF BABEL IN
CHALDEA
BABYLON: “AN OLD STUMP
SPROUTS NEW ROOTS”

DANIEL 4:15, 23, 26 [PHYSICAL &


SPIRITUAL DIMENSIONS]

 THE CUSHITE CHALDEANS:


POLYTHEISTIC
1. WORSHIP—SUN
2. WORSHIP—MOON
3. WORSHIP—PLANETS
GENESIS 11:5-9 & DANIEL 3:1-18
 BABYLON FOLLOWS ITS
PREDECESSOR: ANOTHER ONE-
WORLD UNIVERSAL REBELLION
(cited from Global Peace and
the rise of Antichrist p.95,
Dave Hunt).

To change the system one must


change people’s values and their
thinking. Something must be
introduced that would bring a new
paradigm. Something that would
affect not a few, but many at the
same time. For new ideas to replace
the old ones one, we must disregard
the old and only embrace the new.
We have come to identify this by what
they call it, “the paradigm shift.”
Jesus,’ A Course in Miracles
(Workbook Manual, p. 77)

“A universal theology is impossible,


but a universal experience is not
only possible but necessary”

1. Dialectic: “the art or practice of


examining opinions or ideas
logically, often by the method of
question and answer, so as to
determine their validity.”
 TRUTH IN DISGUISE: SUBJECTIVISM
PROMOTING RELATIVISM…
2. Diaprax or Praxis

REDEFINING TRUTH: NO ABSOLUTES

 OLD TRUTH—THESIS

 NEW CONCEPT—ANTITHESIS

 NEW TRUTH—SYNTHESIS

 The “How to” of praxis

GENESIS 3:1-5
C.I.P: “How can we be wrong when we
are successful?”
NATION & LANGUAGE
ORIGINS: BABEL

CEREMONIAL WORSHIP & TRADITIONAL


CHRISTIANITY

1. THE goddess Ishtar—Nana—Astarte


THROUGH THE CELEBRATION OF
EASTER
2. THE NAMES OF THESE goddesses
HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS OTHER
NAMES FOR BELTIS “MOTHER OF
GOD”.
3. BEADS AND ROSARY VENERATION:
HINDUS-MUSLIMS-BUDDHISTS-
CATHOLICS
GENERATION—SHEM TO
ABRAHAM

GENESIS 10:32
These [are] the families of the sons of
Noah, after their generations, in their
nations: and by these were the nations
divided in the earth after the flood.
GENESIS 11:10, 11
These [are] the generations of Shem:
Shem [was] an hundred years old, and
begat Arphaxad two years after the
flood: And Shem lived after he begat
Arphaxad five hundred years, and
begat sons and daughters.
TWO HEAVYWEIGHT
CONTENDERS: ISRAEL VS.
BABYLON
SIBLINGS RIVALRY

1. GENERATION—SHEM [JESUS’
LINEAGE]

2. GENERATION—HAM [JESUS’
ADVERSARY]

3. TOWER OF BABEL BUILDERS—HAM

4. GOD’S PEOPLE—ISRAEL—SHEM
THE EXODUS OF GOD’S
PEOPLE: ACTS 7:2-4

ABRAHAM: “COME OUT OF BABYLON”

THREE BIBLE GENEALOGIES


1. GENESIS 5 [SETH TO NOAH]

2. GENESIS 11 [SHEM TO ABRAHAM]

3. MATTHEW 1 [ABRAHAM TO JESUS]

 ABRAHAM’S CALL—GENESIS 12:1


REASONS: ABRAHAM…OUT OF
BABYLON?

1. JOSHUA 24:2, 3 [IDOLATRY]

2. GENESIS 12:1-3
[BLESSING—ABRAHAM’S SEED]

 DYNAMICS OF GOD’S WORK

1. HE CHOOSES A PERSON (S)


2. ABRAHAM’S SEED—GOD—NATION
3. FROM THAT NATION—MESSIAH
4. MESSIAH—GROUP OF DISCIPLES—
WORLD
DIFFERENCE: ANCIENT ISRAEL
AND THE CHURCH?

NOTE:
 ANCIENT ISRAEL WOULD PREPARE
THE WORLD FOR THE MESSIAH WHO
WOULD COME.

 THE CHURCH IS TO PREPARE THE


WORLD FOR THE MESSIAH WHO HAS
COME.
CONVENANT: ABRAHAM &
GOD

 GALATIANS 3:16, 17
 2 CORINTHIANS 1:20

GOD’S FOUR PROMISES TO ABRAHAM


1. BLESSING—GENESIS 12:3, 4

2. REAL ESTATE—ROMANS 4:13

3. CITY—HEBREWS 11:8-10

4. SEED—GALATIANS 3:16, 17
SONS & DAUGHTERS OF GOD
UNLIKE SONS & DAUGHTERS OF
MEN…

EXPRESSION: “TO CALL ON THE NAME


OF THE LORD.”

 GENESIS 4:26

 GENESIS 12:8

 GENESIS 26:25

 1 KINGS 18: 36, 37


COMMON DENOMINATORS

THREE DENOMINATORS—PRESENT

1. ALTAR

2. SACRIFICE

3. CALL ON THE NAME OF THE LORD


SALVATION ONLY THROUGH
JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD

 ACTS 2:21

 JOHN 8:56

 GALATIANS 3:13, 14
TWO HURDLES: GOSPEL—
LANGUAGES

CONFUSION OF LANGUAGES

1. IT BECAME MUCH MORE DIFFICULT


TO BUILD AN ALLIANCE.
2. IT MADE THE TASK OF PREACHING
THE GOSPEL MUCH MORE HARDER.

 HOW COULD THE GOSPEL MESSAGE


TO THE WORLD BE ACHIEVED?
 ACTS 1:8; 2:5, 6, 8-11
 13 NATIONS—LANGUAGES
JUSTAS GOD CALLED ANCIENT ISRAEL
TO PROCLAIM HIS MESSAGE OF THE
COMING MESSIAH, TODAY, HE CALLS A
PEOPLE TO PROCLAIM THE MESSAGE
OF THE MESSIAH WHO HAS COME.

TODAY,THE TOWER OF BABEL IS NOT


GEOGRAPHICALLY REMOVED, BUT
UNIVERSALLY UNITED, IN ITS
REBELLION AGAINST GOD.
NEO-BABYLON: MAKEOVER

POINTS TO PONDER: NEO BABYLON

 NEO BABYLON—SELLS & PROMOTES


BABEL CONCEPTS

1. FOLLOWER—BABEL’S TRADITION
2. NEO-BABYLON—CHURCH & STATE–
LEGISLATE & MANDATE UNIVERSAL
WORSHIP REVELATION 13:16;
17:4-6; JEREMIAH 51:6, 7

 NEO-BABYLON MARKETS &


MODERNIZES BABEL’S
FOUNDATIONAL CONCEPTS
WHO’S BEHIND THIS
UNIVERSAL REBELLION?

REVELATION 17:1, 5, 15; 16:12; 18:2, 3


 DO YOU SUPPOSE THAT GOD HAS A
PEOPLE WHO IS GOING TO WARN
THE WORLD ABOUT THIS APOSTATE
SYSTEM?
REVELATION 14:6-12

 GOD WILL HAVE TWO GROUPS, JUST


AS BACK AT THE TOWER OF BABEL:
1. SHEM—ISRAEL
2. HAM—BABEL
REVELATION 18 & 17:13 [ONE MIND]
NIMROD-NEBUCHADNEZZAR-
NEO-BABYLON: “ONE MIND”

1. NIMROD—BABEL: GENESIS 11:1-7


 FOUNDATION
 INITIATE—BUILDING

2. NEBUCHADNEZZAR—IMAGE OF
GOLD: DANIEL 3:1-3, 7-14
 MANDATE—STRUCTURE

3. NEO-BABYLON [ROME]
REVELATION 17:13; 13
MULTI—FACETED NETWORK
 LEGISLATE—LAWS
“COME OUT OF HER
[BABYLON]…”

ABRAHAM—BABYLON

ACTS 7:3; GENESIS 12:1, 2


 BABYLON—GEOGRAPHICAL

 GOD’S PEOPLE—BABYLON
REVELATION 18:4, 5; EXODUS 3:10
 BABYLON—UNIVERSAL

 BABYLON—THREE UNCLEAN SPIRITS:


REVELATION 16:13

 BABYLON: SPIRITUAL
 FINALLY—BABYLON—FALL
BABELUNITY’S FINALE: ONE-
WORLD RELIGION—ONE
SUPREME LEADER
1. NIMROD—ACTIVATES—TOWER OF
BABEL

2. NEBUCHADNEZZAR—MANDATES
BUILDING GOLDEN IMAGE

3. NEO BABYLON—FACILITATES-CO-
ORDINATES-PONTIFICATES ITS
LEADER IN PREPARATION FOR
WORLWIDE CORONATION
REVELATION 13:11-17
"Unity of the Churches: An
Actual Possibility," published
in 1983.
THE ECUMENICAL PLAN—JESUITS
Thesis I—Build a Community of Faith
"The fundamental truths of
Christianity, as they are expressed in
Holy Scripture, in the Apostles'
Creed, and in that of Nicaea and
Constantinople are binding on all
partner churches of the one Church
to be. . .The one Church to be is a
possibility only if it is a community of
faith. . .the individual receives his
faith by way of the community of
faith and of the believers; and . . .the
individual comes to faith by joining
this antecedent community. . .
…The community…assumes primacy
over the individual in the realm of
Christian faith…of believers and not
an isolated individual." p.13
PROFESSORS: KARL RAHNER &
HEINRICH FRIES

Thesis II Individual Dogma


"Beyond that (accepting the creed), a
realistic principle of faith should
apply: Nothing may be rejected
decisively and confessionally in one
partner church which is binding
dogma in another partner church.” P.
25
"As an individual, one becomes ever
more impotent; one has to depend
more and more on the knowledge of
others, which one can no longer
assimilate or check oneself. . . except
among the few in the Roman
Congregation of the Faith…"
p.28-29
THESIS III
"In this one Church of Jesus,
composed of the uniting churches,
there are regional partner churches
which can, to large extent, maintain
their existing structures." p. 43
“On the basis of their theological
expertise and their religious
conscience, the representatives of
this ecclesiastical leadership can
decide in favor of church unity, and
can also work with sufficient zeal
among the church members to gain
their understanding for this
decision." p. 54
Finally Thesis IV

"All partner churches acknowledge


the meaning and right of the Petrine
service of the Roman pope to be the
concrete guarantor of the unity of
the church in truth and love" p. 59
"But there has been for years, in
churches of the Protestant faith, a
strong and growing sentiment in
favor of a union based upon common
points of doctrine. To secure such a
union, the discussion of subjects
upon which all were not agreed—
however important they might be
from a Bible standpoint—must…be
waived…
…And what do we see just ahead?
Another general council! A world's
convention! Evangelical alliance, and
universal creed!" When this shall be
gained, then, in the effort to secure
complete uniformity, it will be only a
step to the resort to force.” {GC, P.
444}
UNANIMITY + UNIFORMITY +
UNITY = ECUMENISM
PARLIAMENT OF WORLD RELIGIONS
O
urM
issio
n

TheC o
u n
cilfo raPa rlia m ento ftheW orld
'sR elig
ion
swascrea tedtocultiv
ate
harm onya m o
n gthew o rld'sreligiousa ndspiritu a
lcomm
u nitiesandfoster
th
eiren gagem entwithth ew orlda ndits g
u id
ingin
stitu
tio
nsino
rdertoa
chiev
e
ajust,peacefulandsu sta inablew orld.

Toaccom plishthis,weinv
itein d
ivid
ualsa
n dco
m m
unitiesw
hoa
reeq
ually
in
vestedina tta
iningthisg
o al.

O
urV
isio
n

Thevisionofth
eC ou
ncilfo
raP arlia
m ento
fth
eWo
rld
' sR
elig
ionsiso
faju
st,
p
eacefu landsu
sta
inab
lew orldinw h
ich:
• Religiousa ndsp iritu a lcom m u nitiesliv einh arm o n
ya ndco ntributetoa
betterw o rldfro m th eirrich eso fw isdo m an dco mpa ssio
n
• Religiousa ndcu ltu ra lfears a ndh atredsa rerepla
cedwithundersta
n d
ing
andresp ect
• Peo pleev eryw h ereco m etok no w an dca refo rth eirn eighbo rs
• Th erich nesso fh um a na ndrelig iou sd iversityisw ovenin toth efa brico f
com m un al,civil,so cieta landg lo ba llife
• Th ew orld 'sm o stp ow e rfula ndin fluentialinstitutio
n smovebeyo
n d
narro w self -interesttorea lizeco m mong ood
• Th eE artha nda lllifea rech erish ed ,p rotected ,healeda ndresto red
• Allp eopleco m m ittoliv in
go utth eirh ighestv a lu
esa n dasp irations.

O
urA
ppro
ach

T heC o uncilf oraP arliam entofth


eW orld
'sR eligio
n sseekstop
romote
interrelig
iou sharm o
n y,rath erthanu n ity
. Theproblemwithseek
ingunity
am o ngreligionsistherisko flosso fth eu niqu
ea ndp
reciousch aractero fea
ch
individu alrelig
iousandsp iritualtra diti o
n ;th
isu
nderstand
ingiskeytoou
r
fram ew ork.

Interreligio ush arm o ny,o nth eo therha nd ,isa na ttain


a blea ndh igh lydesira b
le
goal.S ucha na p
p ro achresp ects,a ndisen richedb y,thep articu laritiesofea ch
tradition.M oreo ver,w ith inea chtra ditio
na reth
ereso
urces(p
hilo
sop
hica
l,
theolo g
ica lan dsp iritualtea ch ing sandp ersp ectives)thaten ab leea chtoen ter
intoresp ectfu l,app reciativ ea n dco o
pera tiverela tionshipsw ithp erso nsan d
com m unitieso fothertra d ition s.

h
ttp
://w
ww.p
arlia
m en
tofrelig
ion
s .o
rg/in
dex
.cfm
?n= 1
SEALING THE THEOLOGICAL
ARGUMENT TIGHT—SCREWS

ONE RELIGION: JESUS CHRIST—THE SON


OF GOD

 ANOTHER RELIGION: JESUS CHRIST—


ONLY A PROPHET

 YET ANOTHER RELIGION: JESUS


CHRIST—GOOD MAN

CONCLUSION: JESUS CHRIST, THE SON


OF GOD, WHO WAS A PROPHET, WAS
A GOOD MAN.
SOLUTION—CONSENSUS!

Anda mungkin juga menyukai