Population
growth;
Water Scarcity;
Sectors
competition;
Food security;
Pollution
emission.
Cost
of
&
new
required
for
new
6 .5
275
6 .0
250
5 .5
5 .0
225
4 .5
200
4 .0
175
3 .5
150
3 .0
125
2 .5
100
2 .0
75
1 .5
P o p u la t i o n G r o w t h
(1 8 9 7 -2 0 5 0 )
20 5 0
20 3 5
20 2 5
20 1 6
20 0 6
19 9 6
19 8 6
19 7 6
19 6 6
19 6 0
0 .0
19 4 7
0
19 3 7
0 .5
19 2 7
25
19 1 7
1 .0
19 0 7
50
P e r -C a p i ta W a te r A l l o c a ti o n
300
18 9 7
0 .9
27 5
0 .8
25 0
0 .7
22 5
20 0
0 .6
17 5
0 .5
15 0
0 .4
12 5
10 0
0 .3
7 5
0 .2
5 0
0 .1
2 5
P o p u la ti o n
G r ow t h
(1 8 9 7 -2 0 5 0 )
P e r -C a p ita L a n d
20 5 0
20 3 5
20 2 5
20 1 6
20 0 6
19 9 6
19 8 6
19 7 6
19 6 6
19 6 0
19 4 7
19 3 7
19 2 7
19 1 7
0
19 0 7
0
18 9 7
30 0
A llo ca tio n
Agriculture (84.5%)
Dinking (6%)
Industry (9.5%)
Nile Water
- 57.5 55.5
Resource
s:
Current
(BCM)
Future 2017
GW
(Deserts&Sinai)
3.5 - 1.0
Crop Pattern&IIP
4.0 + 3.0
Wastewater
2.0 - 0.7
GW
(Valley&Delta)
8.0 6.5
Agr. Dr. Reuse
8.5 - 5.0
Opportunities
Availability;
Availability;
Regulatory&policy
Regulatory&policy framework;
framework;
Technology;
Technology;
Integrated
Integrated Planning;
Planning;
ve
ve Impact
Impact
on:
on:
--Natural
Natural
Efficient
Efficient
mechanisms;
mechanisms;
resources;
resources;
-Environment;
-Environment;
and
and
-Public
-Publichealth.
health.
Sustainabilit
Sustainabilit
y.
y.
Economic
Economic
Introduction
Introduction to
to PPP
PPP approach;
approach;
Raising
Raising
convincing;
convincing;
Awareness/Maintain
Awareness/Maintain
Decentralization
Decentralization
Participation; and
and
Participation;
&
&
Accommodation!
Standards&&
Standards
Guidelines
Guidelines
Appropriate
Appropriate
Technology
Technology
Monitoring&&
Monitoring
Evaluation
Evaluation
Operational
Operational
Rules
Rules
Law
Law
Enforcement
Enforcement
Awareness/
Awareness/
Convince
Convince
At
At
Abstraction
Abstraction
During
During
Delivery
Delivery
At
At
End
EndUser
User
water
service
Facilitating
investments in
infrastructure;
greater
private
sector
irrigation and drainage
:MWRI MED
ID
EPA
D
Sectors
Nile
Central Directorates
C.D
C.D
C.D
Regions
General Directorates
G.D
G.D
G.D
Main canal
ns
o
i
t
c
a
n
r
o
e
i
t
t
n
a
i
n
i
n
d
w
r
coo
nt
e
l
a
m
Top-do
r
e
o
g
t
a
c
e
n
ma
Ins
Ins
Ins
oss-s
r
&
Inspectorates
c
g
d
n
i
e
t
n
i
n
m
a
i
l
L
dp
e
t
a
r
g
e
t
in
Limited
Districts
Farmers /
Water Users
Dist
F / WUs
Dist
Dist
F / WUs
Several
BCs
BCs/Meska
s
Marwas/Plot
s
Empowerment
Responsabilizati
on
Up
Botto
m
Central Government
CDs/GDs
Reg Mgt Com
Integrated WM
Districts
Delegation
Decentralization
SUBSIDIARITY
+ PARTNERSHIPS
= INTEGRATED PLANNING
& MANAGEMENT
Dow
n
Nile
Main
canal
Several BCs
BC
WUAs
Meska
Farmers
/WUs
Marwas/Plots
MWRIs Endeavors
Towards IWRM
Endeavors
Introduction of (PIM) approach: Water Boards
Project (WBP),
Introduction of Irrigation Improvement Projects
(IIPs);
Introduction of Pump Stations Rehabilitation
Projects (PSRPs);
Introduction of National Drainage Projects
(NDPs);
Introduction of Agricultural Policy Reform Project
(APRP);
Life Integrated Water Resources Management
Project (LIFE)
Last, but not least introduction of a new approach to
Integrated Irrigation Improvement and Management
Project (IIIMP).
Objectives
Component 2: Institutional
Development and Capacity Building
Component 4: Environmental
Mainstreaming
Looks into the environmental impacts of the project. The
objective is to identify and mitigate those while also looking at
how the project can contribute to improving environmental
conditions in general (and notably water quality issues).
The overall environmental impact of the IIIMP is expected
to be positive, leading to improved land and water
management.
environmental management plan (EMP) to be addressed
main environmental issues and significant impacts: i. the
uncontrolled discharge of sewage into irrigation and drainage systems, with
corresponding impacts on public health, ii. the improper disposal of solid
wastes into irrigation and drainage canals.
August
August
assessments:
Hydrological
Hydrologicalyearly
yearly
allocation
allocationplan
plan
August-September
August-September
Planned
Plannedreleases
releases
from
fromHAD
HADto
toreach
reach
Delta
Delta(10
(10days),
days),
when
whenfilled
filledwith
with
yearly
floods
yearly floods
September-October
September-October
National
Nationalyearly
yearly
allocation
allocationPlan
Plan
Summer
Summer
Quota/CA
Quota/CA
33
40
m
40 m /fed/day
/fed/day
Yearly
Yearly average
average
quota
quota
3
Two
Two seasons
seasons in
in the
the
cropping
croppingcycle:
cycle:
Summer
Summerseason:
season:
May
Mayto
toAugustAugustSeptember
September
Winter season:
M&E Model of
IWMD
Two-category Indicators
Implementation Indicators
Outcome Indicators
IWMD Established
Data-based Management
BCWUAs Participating
1:
1.3:Farmers Satisfaction
1.4:Rotations
3 Equal groups
2:
3:
Rationalization
IWMD Model can achieve!
Subsidiarity: (vertical integration) decision-taking at
lowest possible level
- framework, procedures & enforcing them
- expertise/technical support/implementation capacity
Achievements
BENEFICIARY
Irrigation
Sector
OUTCOMES
Possibility
of using the
saved water with a value of
5500
CM/fed/year
for
cultivating about 145000
fed of high-cash crops.
BENEFICIARY
Irrigation
Improvement
and
Agriculture
Sector
OUTCOMES
Operation
BENEFICIARY
Drainage
Sector
OUTCOMES
Improve
BENEFICIARY
Users
Organization
Environment
sector
OUTCOMES
Undertaking the responsibilities of
O&M at tertiary level by WUAs will
result in saving their cost which was
evaluated as US$ 2.5/fed. Expected
saving /year = MUS$0.5/year).