Achievement on science educatio

the predictive effect of

attitudes and reasoning
abilities in Portuguese
students from 7th grade
A. Candeias*, P. Vilia1, A. Neto, D.
Varelas
* Email adelindacandeias@gmail.com

University of vora - Portugal

PhD grant from Fundao para a Cincia e Tecnologia (FCT) (SFRH/BD/90575/2012

Objective

In this paper we present the first results of a multivariate

analysis of the contribution of cognitive (measured through a
battery of reasoning tests) and affective (measured through an
attitude questionnaire) abilities on academic achievement in the
subject of Natural Sciences, among Portuguese 7th grade
students.
Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Introduction
Knowing the relevant variables in explaining students achievement
in science subjects is of capital importance in the definition and
improvement of education policies both at national and local levels.
The problem of students achievement is complex and multivariate
Due to this complexity most researchers tend to focus on one of the
many relevant predictor variables, and only seldom do they include
constructs from several areas in their studies thus preventing them
from obtaining a general framework of the situation [1]
Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Cognitive abilities Inteligence

The concept of intelligence as a complex ability to think, to solve new
problems, to think abstractly, to infer, to understand, to recognize and
build structures, relationships, and context meanings and to implement
these relations in various performance situations assumes a particularly
important role in the educational context
The long tradition of research on the cognitive variables of students
lead to a general consensus on the existence of a positive and
statistically significant correlation between academic achievement of
students and their cognitive capabilities [ 2, 3].
In this study five specific reasoning dimensions: numerical, verbal,
spatial, abstract and mechanical, measured by a Reasoning Test Battery
(RTB) [4], were assessed to investigate their relationship with school
Introduct
Discussio
grades
Method Results
ion

Attitude towards school

science

Jonathan Osborne and colleagues define Attitudes towards science as "feelings,

beliefs and values about an object that can be enterprise of science, school
science, the impact of science on society or scientists themselves[5]

Its important to distinguish between attitudes toward making school

science and attitudes towards science in general [6, 7, 8]. Is the
students perception about school science which is likely to influence
their learning and to be significant in determining the students'
decisions about their choices in terms of future career [9]
The relationship between attitudes and achievement has been a
matter of debate, although the general agreement is that there is a
positive, though moderate, relationship between them [10]
Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Attitude towards Natural

Science

Students may have different attitudes towards the different branches of Science
and so, measuring attitudes towards a unitary concept of "science" , may cause
deviations in the results [10, 11]

Chemistry and physics seem to be science subjects towards which students'

attitudes are more negative, unlike biology which is usually the most popular
discipline [5, 6, 12] Because of this the number of studies about biology or other
specific science subjects, such as earth sciences are scarce.

This paper considers that the construct Attitude towards Natural

Science includes motivational, affective and behavioural
dimensions. These dimensions were assessed through a
questionnaire.
Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Natural Sciences in Portuguese

school context
In Portugal compulsory education begins at the age of 6 and lasts for
12 years.
During the first 6 years science education in the first and second
cycles corresponds to a single, general, integrated subject area.
In the 3rd cycle (years 7 to 9) students have two compulsory science
disciplines: Natural Sciences (including contents about biology
and earth sciences ) and Physics and Chemistry
Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Methods
The data for this study were collected as a part of a larger research
project - Academic Performance and Development: a longitudinal
study on the effects of school transitions in Portuguese students.
Participants
313 7th grade students - 48,2% boys and 51,8% girls, aged 11 to 15
years old (mean 12,480,61 and median 12 years), belonging to ten
schools spread around the country.

Academic achievement
Academic achievement was assessed directly from the students
school grades at the end of each school term. These data, ranging
from 1 to 5, were provided by the schools.
Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Instruments 1
Reasoning Test Battery (RTB)[4]
This battery of intends to assess cognitive achievement taking into
account the apprehension of relations between elements (inductive
reasoning) and the application of the inferred relations to new
situations (deductive reasoning)

In the version for the 3rd cycle of basic education, the battery
Numerical
Verbal
Spatial
Abstract
Mechanical
integrates five
tests:
a

Test

reasoning (NR)

Format

Numerical
sequences

Number of
items
Time

20
10 mm

reasoning
(VR)

reasoning
(SR)

Verbal
Cube rotation
analogies

reasoning (AR) reasoning (MR)

Figure
analogies

Quotidian
physics
problems
25
20
25
25
Introduct
Discussio
Method Results
ion
n
4 min
9 min
5 min
8 min

Instruments 2
Attitude towards Sciences Questionnaire (ATSQ) [13]
In the version for the 3rd cycle of basic education the questionnaire
integrates three dimensions:
ATSQ Affective, which consists of attitudes that express feelings and emotions
towards the contents and the learning process in sciences;
ATSQ Behavioural, that comprises attitudes toward tasks of learning of science
contents;
ATSQ Instrumental, that involves attitudes that cover the utility of science
contents in daily life.

The (ATSQ) is composed of 26 items.The answer scale is a 4 point Likert type

(1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Agree, 4=Strongly Agree).
Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Statistical procedures 1
Data normalization
In order to allow easier comparison and to eliminate some ambiguity
resulting from the differences between the various schools, the raw
values of all variables were submitted to a linear normalization
procedure and transformed into T-scores
T-score normalized scores express individual value distance to average
in terms of the standard deviation of the distribution and converts the
raw data distribution into one with average=50 and standard
deviation=10

, where X is the raw value, is the mean value and SD is the standard
deviation.
Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Statistical procedures 2
Data analysis
The existence of statistically significant correlations between the five
RTB tests and the three dimensions of ATSQ and the school grades in
each of the three school terms was assessed by calculating the Pearson
Correlation Coefficient.
Stepwise Multiple regression analyses were then conducted to
investigate the predictive power of RTB and ATSQ in school grades in
each of the three school terms.
All the statistical procedures and tests were conducted using IBM SPSS
Statistics 21 software package.
Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Results 1
Correlation analysis between the five RTB tests and Natural Sciences
RTB NR
RTB VR
RTB SR
RTB AR
RTB MR
grades.
,282**
Pearson
Correlation
1st term
,000
Sig. (2-tailed)
261
N
,274**
Pearson
Correlation
2nd term
,000
Sig. (2-tailed)
258
N
,214**
Pearson
Correlation
3rd term
,000
Sig.
**. Correlation is significant
at (2-tailed)
the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
288
N

,399**

,332**

,361**

,179**

,000
267
,365**

,000
267
,314**

,001
267
,305**

,003
262
,200**

,000
264
,365**

,000
264
,303**

,000
264
,266**

,001
264
,185**

,000
298

,000
298

,000
298

,001
298

All correlations are positive and statistically significant at the 0.01 level,
although the level of correlation was always moderated or weak.
Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Results 2
Correlation coefficient between ATS dimensions and Natural sciences

ATS behavioural ATS affective

ATS instrumental
grades.
,298**
Pearson
Correlation
1st term
,000
Sig. (2-tailed)
267
N
,319**
Pearson
Correlation
2nd term
,000
Sig. (2-tailed)
264
N
,296**
Pearson
Correlation
3rd term
,000
(2-tailed)
**. Correlation is significantSig.
at the
0.01 level (2-tailed).
298
N

,311**

,201**

,000
267
,338**

,001
267
,244**

,000
264
,326**

,000
264
,224**

,000
298

,000
298

All correlations are positive and statistically significant at the 0.01 level,
although the level of correlation was always moderated or weak.
Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Results 3
Multiple regression stepwise analyses
Significant models emerged in all three terms
1st term: F4, 257=23, 28; p < 0, 0005; R2Adjst=0,255;
2nd term: F4, 254=19, 53; p < 0, 0005; R2Adjst=0,223;
3rd term: F3, 285=24, 93; p < 0, 0005; R2Adjst= 0,200.
The models obtained from the use of both variables were always stronger
accounting for higher proportions of the students grade variations.
Verbal reasoning component (RTB VR) was the strongest single significant
predictor in all models with values ranging 0,264 to 0,317.

Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Multiple
regression
summary tables

Results 4
Multiple regression stepwise analyses
Numerical reasoning, though presenting significant correlation values, was never
a significant predictor in the multiple regression models.
Spatial reasoning was always a significant predictor, and abstract reasoning only
emerged in the model for the 1st term (= 0,245).
The results for the attitudinal dimensions were somewhat surprising since only
the behavioural dimension occurred as single predictor (= 0,143 to 0,221).

Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Multiple

Multiple
Discussio
regression
n
summary tables

Discussion/Conclusion
The results from this study give support to the assertion that
cognitive abilities are important in predicting the achievement in
Natural Sciences.
The basic skills related to learning and problem solving, namely
understanding and decoding verbal information, spatial and abstract
reasoning seem to be especially relevant in explaining the variance
in Natural Sciences achievement
Included in the predictive model that emerges from this study is also
an attitudinal variable, in this case, the behaviours associated to
studying and performing the different tasks related to learning this
school subject.
No other attitudinal

Introduct
Discussio
Method Results
ion
n
(affective
or instrumental) dimension
occurs

in

Discussion/Conclusion
Our data suggest that achievement in Natural Sciences is mainly
connected with the students cognitive abilities and with their
attitude towards the behaviours and the work routines needed to
accomplish the learning objectives
These results raise some apprehension in what they suggest: only
students with higher cognitive abilities will be able to attain the
highest achievement levels
This prompts us to question the role of school educational
intervention in the promotion of positive attitudes towards science
and in the development of scientific attitudes. Similar problems and
doubts have been raised
in other studies in countries
like Hong Kong
Introduct
Discussio
Method Results
[14] or Turkey [10]
n
ion

Bibliography
1. Byrnes, J.P. and D.C. Miller, The relative importance of predictors of math and science achievement: An
opportunitypropensity analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2007. 32(4): p. 599-629
2. Candeias, A., A. Rosrio, L. Almeida, and M. Guisande, Bateria de provas de raciocnio diferencial: Suporte
sua utilizao em orientao vocacional. Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia, 2007. 41(1): p. 143-156.
3. Deary, I.J., S. Strand, P. Smith, and C. Fernandes, Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 2007.
35(1): p. 13-21.
4. Almeida, L.S. and G. Lemos, Bateria de Provas de Raciocnio: Manual Tcnico. 2006, Braga: Centro de
Investigao em Psicologia. Universidade do Minho
5. Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins, Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications.
International Journal of Science Education, 2003. 25(9): p. 1049-1079.
6. Tytler, R. and J. Osborne, Student attitudes and aspirations towards science, in Second international handbook
of science education. 2012, Springer. p. 597-625.
7. Simon, S. and J. Osborne, Students attitudes to science, in Good Practice In Science Teaching: What Research
Has To Say: What research has to say, J. Osborne and J. Dillon, Editors. 2010, McGraw-Hill - Open University
Press: Berkshire, England. p. 238-258.

Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Bibliography
8. Blalock, C.L., M.J. Lichtenstein, S. Owen, L. Pruski, C. Marshall, and M. Toepperwein, In Pursuit of Validity: A
comprehensive review of science attitude instruments 19352005. International Journal of Science Education,
2008. 30(7): p. 961-977.
9. Nieswandt, M., Attitudes Toward Science: A Review of the Field, in Beyond Cartesian Dualism, W. Cobern, et
al., Editors. 2005, Springer Netherlands. p. 41-52.
10. Can, H.B. and Y. Boz, A cross-age study on high school students attitudes toward chemistry. International
Journal on New Trends in Education & their Implications (IJONTE), 2012. 3(3).
11. Spall, K., M. Stanisstreet, D. Dickson, and E. Boyes, Development of school students' constructions of biology
and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 2004. 26(7): p. 787-803.
12. Lyons, T. and F. Quinn, Choosing science, in Understanding the declines in senior high school science
enrolments. Armidale, NSW: University of New England2010, SiMERR National Centre, University of New
England: Armidale, Australia.
13. Neto, A., A.A. Candeias, N. Rebelo, D. Varelas, and A.M. Diniz, Validade estrutural do questionrio de atitudes
face s Cincias Naturais: Estudo com alunos do 9 ano ensino bsico portugus. (poster), in XII Congresso
Internacional Galego-Portugus de Psicopedagogia2013: Universidade Minho, Braga, Portugal.
14. Cheung, D., Students Attitudes Toward Chemistry Lessons: The Interaction Effect between Grade Level and
Gender. Research in Science Education,
2009. 39(1): p. 75-91.
Introduct
Discussio

ion

Method

Results

Multiple regression summary tables

Summary of stepwise multiple regression analysis between RTB

and ATSQ and Natural Sciences1st term grades

Std. Error

Sig.

RTB VR

,265

,059

,264 4,530

,000

RTB AR

,260

,062

,245 4,180

,000

ATS Behavioural

,342

,116

,159 2,950

,003

RTB SR

,143

,058

,144 2,442

,015

r2= ,266; Adjst r2= ,255; F(4,257)=23,28; p<0,001

Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Multiple
regression

Multiple regression summary tables

Summary of stepwise multiple regression analysis between RTB

and ATSQ and Natural Sciences 2nd term grades

Std. Error

Sig.

RTB VR

,261

,060

,260 4,337

,000

RTB AR

,214

,053

,221 4,007

,000

ATS Behavioural

,198

,064

,187 3,104

,002

RTB SR

,122

,060

,123 2,032

,043

r2= ,235; Adjst r2= ,223; F(4,258)=19,53; p<0,001

Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Multiple
regression

Multiple regression summary tables

Summary of stepwise multiple regression analysis between RTB

and ATSQ and Natural Sciences 3rd term grades

Std. Error

Sig.

RTB VR

,322

,057

,317 5,636 ,000

RTB SR

,197

,057

,196 3,477 ,001

ATS Behavioural

,140

,051

,143 2,719 ,007

r2= ,208; Adjst r2= ,200; F(4,258)=19,53; p<0,001

Introduct
Method
ion

Results

Discussio
n

Multiple
regression