100%(1)100% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (1 suara)
165 tayangan19 halaman
This document discusses Standard English and African American Vernacular English (AAVE). It provides background on how languages become standardized and argues that Standard English is a social dialect rather than a full language or accent. The document also outlines some key linguistic features of Standard English and AAVE. It acknowledges AAVE as a rule-governed, systematic variety of English like any other. While promoting the benefits of acquiring Standard English, it warns against characterizing other varieties in a demeaning way and advocates pedagogical approaches that recognize the legitimacy of diverse varieties.
This document discusses Standard English and African American Vernacular English (AAVE). It provides background on how languages become standardized and argues that Standard English is a social dialect rather than a full language or accent. The document also outlines some key linguistic features of Standard English and AAVE. It acknowledges AAVE as a rule-governed, systematic variety of English like any other. While promoting the benefits of acquiring Standard English, it warns against characterizing other varieties in a demeaning way and advocates pedagogical approaches that recognize the legitimacy of diverse varieties.
This document discusses Standard English and African American Vernacular English (AAVE). It provides background on how languages become standardized and argues that Standard English is a social dialect rather than a full language or accent. The document also outlines some key linguistic features of Standard English and AAVE. It acknowledges AAVE as a rule-governed, systematic variety of English like any other. While promoting the benefits of acquiring Standard English, it warns against characterizing other varieties in a demeaning way and advocates pedagogical approaches that recognize the legitimacy of diverse varieties.
Peter Trudgills paper Standard English: What it isnt (in Trudgill, P. (2002). Sociolinguistic Variation and Change. Washington, DC George Washington University Press.
How does a language becomes
standardized? Selection: Deciding what version of a language will be standardized How did this happen in English?
Codification: giving a variety a publicly
recognized form How did this happen in English?
Stabilization: the fixing of a variety to
contain less variation How did this happen in English?
Is Standard English a language?
Languages contain many varieties (dialects) Standard English is a very important variety of English (found in most writing, it is the language of the Educated elite, it is the variety taught to non-native speakers of English)
Most native speakers of English are not
standard English speakers Standard English cannot be a language
Is Standard English an accent?
Accent is concerned with pronunciation Take a well-recognized highly prestigious accent (RP) Do RP speakers speak Standard English? Do Standard English speakers speak RP?
Do newscaster speak standard English?
Do all newscasters have the same accent?
Given that people can speak standard
English with different accents, then Standard English cannot be an accent.
Is Standard English a style of
speech? Styles are varieties of language that can be spoken in formal and informal contexts Given this definition, then single speakers have a number of different styles that they use in different contexts. The same speakers could say: I was exceedingly fatigued after this weekends copious consumption of alcoholic intoxicants I was totally hung over from drinking too much this weekend
Is it possible to say either of these in a formal or
informal setting? If so, then SE is not a style
Sowhat is it? A social dialect of
English that Has unusual and irregular present tense morphology I go; you go; we go; they gobut he/she/it goes
Lacks multiple negation
I dont want none vs. I dont wand any.
Fails to distinguish between singular and
plural second person pronouns You bother me (not you all, youse, youse guys, yall, thou
The Linguistic Society of Americas
resolution to the Ebonics issue In January of 1997, the LSA passed a resolution on AAVE. Here are some selected quotes from it: The variety known as Ebonics, AAVE or VBEis systematic and rule-governed like all natural speech varieties. In fact, all human linguistic systemsspoken, signed, and written are fundamentally regular.
Characterizations of Ebonics as slang.
mutant, lazy, defective, ungrammatical, or broken English are incorrect and demeaning. The distinction between languages and dialects is usually made more onsocial and political grounds than on purely linguistic ones.
For those living in the United States there are
also benefits in acquiring Standard English and resources should be made available to all who aspire to mastery of Standard English. There is evidence from Sweden, the US, and other countries that speakers of other varieties can be aided in their learning of the standard variety by pedagogical approaches which recognize the legitimacy of other varieties of a language.
Features of Standard American
English Has unusual and irregular present tense morphology I go; you go; we go; they gobut he/she/it goes
Lacks multiple negation
I dont want none vs. I dont wand any.
Fails to distinguish between singular and
plural second person pronouns You bother me (not you all, youse, youse guys, yall, thou
Features of AAVE 1.
Present tense/3rd person absence
he walk for he walks she raise for she raises
2. Plural absence on general plural (but not
plurals for weights and measures) four girl for four girls some dog for some dogs But not four cup for four cups
3. Remote time been (something that
happened a long time ago and is still relevant) You been paid your dues. I been known him for a long time But not You been gone to school today.
4. Copular be deletion
She nice for Shes nice
He in the kitchen for Hes in the kitchen You ugly for You ugly
Questions Identify some social groups you belong to that make your dialect what it is. Which recent US presidents spoke (or speak) with a distinct regional accent?
When you were in elementary school, did
any or all of your elementary school teachers use the variety of the region where your school was located? Did any of your elementary or secondary school teachers speak a variety of English that differed from the region where you studied>
Think of reasons why a junior high
school student might want to know Standard English, apart from traditional educational values. What might Standard English do for this type of student right now? What do you conclude about the utility of Standard English at this point in their lives?
Consider the following quotation, taken from an editorial by
William Raspberry in the Washington Post (10/1/1986) in an article titled: Black Kids Need Standard English. And how could teachers help them [i.e., AAVE speakers] to acquire Standard English without eroding their innate pride in Black Culture? One retired teacher of my acquaintance used to do it by explaining that so-called Black English is nothing more than the language slaves learned from their ignorant white overseers.
Do you see any potential pitfalls in using
such reasoning as a motivation for standard English? If so, what would you replace it with? How does this reasoning relate to the information we have read on the different positions of the origins of AAVE?