PREAMBLE
Lets assume that we gave a Rs 80,000/contract for some repair work in our
house. The job was to be completed in 15
days and involved major repairs in one of
the toilets. Repair needs were mutually
agreed.
After 15 days our monitoring tells us that
all is not going well. There have been
problems in locating various water pipes in
the bathroom.
The contractor billed us Rs 85,000/- for the
work.
11
Schedule
variance
is
being
measured in monetary units not time
units.
12
13
14
15
Trends
are
easily
identified
deliverables and the whole project.
for
16
17
is
BCWP
EV
60,000
=
=
= 0.75
BCWS
PV
80,000
19
BAC
EAC =
CPI
BAC = Budget At Completion. The sum of all
authorized budgets allocated to a
project. It is synonymous with
earned value term Performance
Measurement Baseline.
21
In our case it is ..
80,000
EAC =
= Rs 1,13,475.17
0.705
22
23
24
EV
= SPI
PV
25
Ratio
EV
= CPI
AC
Compare
What have you done by now (EV)
To
What you have spent by now (AC)
You
Get a reading on productivity called
CPI
26
Interpretation of Indices
Index
Cost (CPI)
> 1.00
Under Cost
= 1.00
On Cost
< 1.00
Over Cost
Table 1:
Schedule (SPI)
Ahead of schedule
On schedule
Behind schedule
Efficiency Indices
28
29
PROJECT FEATURES
Project estimate Rs 1.5M to produce 10
units in house.
Project team came to this
careful study of the
budget after a
product and
PROJECT FEATURES
31
33
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
Remember the CEO had specifically asked
that EVPM be employed on this project.
That requirement adds a slightly different
orientation to project performance data.
EVPM requires a detailed bottom-up
performance
plan,
and
a
three
dimensional measurement against the
base line plan.
EVPM also requires a periodic forecast of
the final expected results, based on actual
performance.
34
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
it
a
is not.
focus
Earned
on the
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
Managements
authorized
budget
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
38
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
39
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
42
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
procedures
some sixty
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
the problem of
different measures
45
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
46
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
47
Planned value
Cost
Actual spend
Value generated
Fig 1
Time
48
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
49
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
50
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
value
accomplished
and
51
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
53
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
54
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
55
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
Rs 1.5M
12 months
Getting project
back on schedule
56
Final Results
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
57
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
58
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
59
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
60
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
Scope creep
61
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
If
management
authorizes
an
inadequate budget, the project team
performs poorly, or the work is
constantly added because the project
scope was never properly defined in the
first place. EV will not prevent cost
growth. EV cannot perform a miracle!
62
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
EV has been
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
EV
is
based
on
an
integrated
management approach that provides the
best indicator of true cost performance,
available
with
no
other
management technique
project
64
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
65
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
66
67
Thousands (000)
Authorized
Budget
1,000,000
1,000
750
500
Cost Spend
Plan
250
Quarters
68
Thousands (000)
Status
date
Authorized
Budget
1,000,000
1,000
750
500
Planned
Costs
= 300K
250
Quarters
Fig 3:
69
Thousands (000)
1,000
Status
date
Authorized
Budget
1,000,000
750
500
Planned
Value =
300
250
Quarters
70
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
EVPM EMPLOYMENT
72
73
74
Variance from an
expenditure plan =
(0K)
75
80
60
40
20
10
15
20
25
30
35
Fig 6:
Project S-Curves
40
45
76
Activity
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Design
Engineer
Install
20
Test
Total
12
28
Cumulative
12
20
32
60
68
74
78
80
Table 2:
Total
80
80
60
40
20
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Fig 7:
78
79
S-curves
80
81
S-curves
82
S-curves
S-curves
84
85
S-curves
Cost
Project
S-curves
Performance
Schedule
86
S-curves
87
S-curves
Cost
Performance
Tracking control charts,
Gantt charts
Schedule
88
S-curves
89
S-curves
90
S-curves
Cost
Earned
Value
Performance
Tracking control charts,
Gantt charts
Fig 10:
Schedule
91
S-curves
Schedule
and
cost
must
be
subordinate to technical performance.
92
S-curves
93
94
95
96
Fig 11:
97
98
100
101
102
+
1.00
Good = +1.0
Plan = 1.0
Poor = -1.0
(for every 1.00 work planned you get 1.00 in earned value)
(for every 1.00 in cost actuals you get 1.00 in earned value)
103
104
106
1. The Mathematical or
Overrun-to-Date
Estimate at Completion
107
Status
date
+
1.00
(BAC EV)
1.0 pf
AC + BAC EV
108
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
109
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
an
early
front-end
overrun
disappearing
through
exemplary
performance of the remaining work.
111
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
112
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
113
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
2.
115
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
116
Status
date
+
Plan
1.00
Cumulative CPI
EAC
BAC
Cum. CPI
EAC
117
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
118
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
119
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
120
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
122
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
123
Status
date
+
Plan
1.00
Cumulative SPI
Cumulative CPI
EAC
124
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
126
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
EVPM Independent
Statistical EAC
Comparison
128
129
Time Management
Time Management
131
Time Management
132
Time Management
133
Time Management
As discussed earlier:
The
EV
schedule
variances
represent the difference between
what
was
actually
physically
accomplished (the EV) less what
was planned to be accomplished
(the PV)
SV = EV PV
134
Time Management
Time Management
136
Status date
Budget
Budget
100%
75%
Planned value
50%
Earned value
25%
Year 1
Year 2
2 months behind
2 months late?
137
Time Management
Everyone on overtime
or
Bring in more people for
this job
138
Time Management
Status date
1.00
Baseline
Plan
Cumulative SPI
Time
140
Recommendation
Time Management
Time Management
142
Time Management
143
Time Management
144
Time Management
145
Time Management
for
any
146
Time Management
147
148
Activation Limits
of EVM Indices
Index Thresholds
Fig 18
Out of control
149
Activation Limits
of EVM Indices
150
Activation Limits
of EVM Indices
151
152
Three Factors
153
Three Factors
Three Factors
Three Factors
EV
accurately
measures
project
performance, but must assume that
scope definition is adequate and that
the project has been given an
achievable budget and a realistic
schedule.
156
Three Factors
the
Three Factors
Factor-3: Managements
determination
influence the final results
to
Three Factors
To
what
extent
will
project
performance data be monitored and
the data believed by management?
159
Three Factors
161
Work remaining
TCPI =
Funds remaining
on the status
check date
162
Status date
TCPI
1.00
Baseline
Plan
Cumulative
CPI
Formula:
Work remaining
Funds remaining
= TCPI
165
= TCPI (BAC)
= TCPI (EAC)
166
167
168
169
Sunk
Costs
Status
date at
50%
Complete
TCPI
1.25
Baseline Plan
1.00
Opportunity
Costs
Cumulative
CPI
.75
170
171
come
from
that
172
174
176
177
180
181
(1)
1.00
PM EAC
Baseline Plan
Cumulative
CPI
Math EAC
(2)
Cum. CPI EAC
(3)
CPI x SPI EAC
182
183
186
189
Stated
another
way,
without
a
scheduling
system
in
place,
EV
performance cannot take place.
190
When
one
adds
resources
(managements authorized budget) to
the scheduling system and metrics to
plan and consume such resources, the
EV performance plan is in place.
191
192
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Equivalent units.
6.
Earned standards.
Typically used
for non-recurring
tasks
1.
195
1.
2.
75%
50%
50%
40%
60%
3.
4.
Fig 24:
100%
67%
100%
196
2.
by
Task:
198
3.
199
To
minimize
inflated
subjective
200
201
is 100%
balance of
203
4.
5.
6.
Earned Standards
The use of earned standards to initially
set a budget and subsequently to
measure the earned performance of
repetitive work is perhaps the most
sophisticated of all the methods, and
requires the most discipline on the part
of the participants.
207
of
for
be
209
210
And
to
assess
the
statistical
probability of actually achieving the
plan
213
214
Its format
called the
versus the
217
218
219
A
subtle
departure
from
PERT
experience but it made all difference
between success and failure for the
new approach.
Do
they
measure
performance
against those packages of work ..
.. and do.
223
Management
System
225
227
EPILOGUE
228
229
and
answers
more
230
Most
corporate
/
public
sector
executives
measure
their
cost
performance on projects by using only
two dimensions:
The projected
costs
cost
versus
actual
232
What is missing?
233
for the
missing
234
90 million
had only
235
236
237
Cost
performance
represented
the
difference between the accomplished
work (represented by earned standards)
versus the actual costs incurred.
238
239
Cost
Planned Cost
Cost to date
Time
Fig 26
240
241
Authorized
budget
authorized work
for
the
242
Planned
standards
simply
represented their baseline plan. It
was only when such work was
completed
that
they
could
determine
their
true
cost
performance.
243
244
Scientifically
documented
empirical evidence collected from
over 700 DOD contracts (projects)
that
have
employed
EVM,
demonstrate
a
pattern
of
consistent
and
predictable
performance. Summary of findings
is as shown:
245
Given
Contract more than 15% complete
1. Overrun at completion will not be less than
overrun to date.
2. Percent overrun at completion will be
greater than percent overrun to date.
Conclusion
You cant recover
Who says
More than 700 major DOD contracts since 1977
Why
If you under estimated the near, there is no
hope that you can do better on the far term
planning.
Fig 27:
246
KEEP AWAY!
247
248