Introduction
Harvik Rubber Industries S.B. started
operation 1973. Making hand crafted rubber
safety & non safety boots
An ISO 9001:2008 & ISO 14001:2004
certified company
Current workforce 450 people
Major processes/ production areas Mixing,
Machine Hall, Moulding, Cutting, Preparation
& Assembly
Technical Department as servicing party
2
Objectives
To identify safety and health hazards related
to workplace activities
To describe techniques to be used in
identifying safety and health hazards at
workplace
To assess hazard and using risk matrix
To prepare risk ranking to identify critical
hazards
To indentify and propose control measures
for critical hazards either by eliminating,
substituting, isolating, applying engineering3
Objectives
To review the effectiveness of risk
assessment phase and implementation of
proposed control measures
To increase awareness and direct
involvement of employees and top
management in Safety and Health
Management System
To encourage effective management of
workplace safety and health hazards
To create a safer and healthier workplace for
all employees
4
Selected Processes
Processes that have been chosen for this
study
Testing processes by Technical
Department
Spreading process by Machine Hall
Section
Technical
Department
Testing Process
(Compound mixing)
Technical
Department
Machine Hall
Spreading Process
5
Epitome of
Rubber Boot
Manufacturing
Process
Selected Processes
Flow chart of
Compound Mixing
Process
Flow chart of
Sample Testing
Process
Flow
chart of
Spreadin
Methodology
Identification of HAZARDS (health hazards,
safety hazards & environmental hazards)
Three main methods used in this study
Observation
Document review
Interview
Methodology
Observation
Compound Mixing Process
Chemical weighing, mixing & sheeting out
Spreading Process
Execution of process and specific area in the
process where solvent vapour get released
Methodology
Document Review
Compound Mixing Process
Data on previous incidents, CHRA report,
Safety & Health highlights in work instruction
and MSDS
Spreading Process
Literature on textile rubber coating, CHRA
report and MSDS
10
Methodology
Interview
Compound Mixing Process
Lab technician handling of raw chemical,
awareness on PPE and chemical exposure
Spreading Process
Production Operator - Transfer of material,
smell of gasoline, awareness on PPE and
chemical exposure
11
Risk Assessment
Risk
Matrix
Severity
Likelihood
Fatality
(4)
Neg. injury
(1)
Very likely
(4)
High
(16)
High
(12)
High
(8)
Medium
(4)
Likely
(3)
High
(12)
High
(9)
Medium
(6)
Medium
(3)
Unlikely
(2)
High
(8)
Medium
(6)
Medium
(4)
Low
(2)
Very unlikely
(1)
Medium
(4)
Medium
(3)
Low
(2)
Low
(1)
12
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
Index
Process
Safety hazards
1
Compound
Mixing
2
Compound
Mixing
3
Sample
Testing
4
Sample
Testing
5
Sample
Testing
6
Hazard
Impact
Severity Likelihood
Rel.
Risk
Risk
Level
12
High
Low
Low
Accidental drop of
Hand injury
moulds upper platen
Slip-off of sample fixed on Slipped-off sample
impact tester
can fly and hit people
at surrounding
High static charge build- Fire emergency
up at spreading machine
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Toxicity
High
Spreading
Process
Health hazards
1
Compound
Skin contact with rubber
Mixing
chemicals
2
Sample testing Inhalation of chemical
vapour
3
Spreading
Inhalation of solvent
process
vapour
13
Risk Assessment
Inde
x
Hazard
Risk Action
Severi Likeliho
Table
ty
od
Safety hazards
1
Tacky rubber compound
2
High static charge buildup at spreading machine
3
Accidental drop of
moulds upper platen
4
Slip-off of sample fixed on
impact tester
5
Oily surface of rubber
processing oil bottle
6
Sharp edge of cutting
dies
Health hazards
1
Inhalation of solvent
vapour
2
Inhalation of chemical
3
4
4
2
12
8
High
High
1
2
Mediu
m
Mediu
m
Low
Low
High
3
3
Mediu
4
5
14
Critical Hazard
Safety Hazard
Tacky Rubber Compound during compound
mixing
Relative risk score of 12 and highest among
identified safety hazards
Compound mixing on daily basis - high
frequency (4) for Likelihood
Potential to loss their fingers major injury
(permanent disability , 3) for severity
Score of 12 - High Risk based on Risk
Ranking Table
15
Critical Hazard
Health Hazard
Inhalation of solvent vapour by Spreading
Machine operators
Score of 9 - highest under risk tabulation for
health hazards
Operating the machine on daily basis with
intermittent stops - rating of 3 under
Likelihood
Inhaling solvent vapour would be toxicity
and related diseases - Severity rating of 3
Score of 9 - High Risk based on Risk Ranking
16
Table
Cease of operation
Increase in medical
workplace illnesses
Loss of skills
expenses
17
Isolation - Isolation of
Process from other areas
Spreading
18
Review Programmes
19
Benefits of Recommendations
Thank You!
Q &A
21