Cooperative Movement:
Problems and Prospects
(1986 present)
Prof. Jorge V. Sibal
UP-Diliman
<sibal_jorge@yahoo.com>
phase- Introduction
and rise of the nonagricultural coops
5th phase- Martial law
period and the
politization of the coop
movement.
Various
coop movements
involvement in parliamentary
struggle avoided politization and
too much state intervention under
the principle of subsidiarity.
Operating coops increased by 393
percent from 1983 to 1993, and by
540 percent from 1993 to 2009.
Table 1. Philippine
Cooperatives, 1939-2009
1939
1969
1977
1980
1985
1993
2009
Number
570
1,530
1,897
2,941
3,350
25,125
78,611
No. (Confirmed)
--
--
--
--
1,142
4,494
23,836
Membership
(000s)
105
Year
Assets (million)
Capital (million)
3.4
n.a.
555
460
223
337
30
129
280
1,503
129
194
627
n.a.
Sources: 1939-1985- Gray Wine Think Tank, 1993- CDA, 2009- CDA & DOF
*1993 (Braid) & 2009 membership covers only confirmed coops
3,200
5,856*
118,400
176,020
--
--
total registered
cooperatives increased
dramatically by 7.5 times
from 1985 to 1993
compared to an increase of
only a little over 3 times
from 1993 to 2009 (Table 1
& Chart 1).
performance of operating
cooperatives increased by 3.9
times from 1985 to 1993, and 5.3
times from 1993 to 2009.
This means that more cooperatives
are becoming viable after they are
registered in 1993-2009 compared
to those registered in 1985-1993.
No. of
Coops
% to
Assets
Total No.
of Coops
% to
Total
Assets
83.7%
P 7.88 Billion
4.5%
Small (P3 to
P15 Million)
2,594
10.9%
P 17.59 Billion
10.0%
Medium (P15
to P100
Million)
1,015
4.4%
P 37.83 Billion
21.5%
Large (Over
P100 Million)
230
1.0%
P112.71 Billion
64.0%
23,836
100.0%
P176.02 Billion
100.0%
Totals
Source: CDA and DOF
Membership/
Coop
(Ave.)
% of Coop
Membership vs
Population
Rank
Highest/
(lowest)
1,201,830
523
54.5%
IX- Zamboanga
321,917
321
20.6%
II- Cagayan
245,640
283
14.64%
CAR
124,130
166
14.61%
NCR
780,555
297
13.95%
V- Bicol
145,440
195
5.55%
238,770
124
6.37%
497,085
234
6.80%
5,856,074
246
13.04%
Region
Top 5
XI- Davao
Lowest 3
Philippines
(1)
Percent contribution to
regional GDP
Rank
XII- Socsargen
11.91%
11.49%
XI- Davao
9.07%
X- Northern Mindanao
8.89%
CARAGA
7.45%
V- Bicol
1.43%
1.55%
1.84%
Philippines
Source: CDA and DOF
5.14%
Top 5 Regions
Lowest 3 Regions
Quality growth
Consolidation
Differentiation
Social relevance
National, market presence
Poor image- The image of coops is small,
inefficient, individual performers with low
standard of service, or an image of a
jeepney.
References:
References:
References:
Remo, Amy, 2011, NEA, DBP to finance co-ops fund requirements, Philippine
Daily Inquirer, July 11, 2011.
Rola, Leandro, 1989 Cooperative Education and Training Issues/Problems and
Recommendations, The State of Cooperative Development in the Philippines,
QC: Cooperative Foundation of the Philippines, Inc.
Santiaguel, Mannie, 2011, The Role of Cooperative in Poverty Reduction,
cooperativeunionofcavite.com/.../The%20Role%20of%20Cooperatives%20In
%20Global%20Poverty... (opned Aug. 201)
Scott, William, 1992, The Union Obrera Democratica: The First Filipino Labor
Union, QC: New Day Publishers.
Sibal, Jorge, 1991, The Self-managed Enterprises and the Vision of a Mixed
Economy, paper read at the PEDF Seminar-Workshop on Issues in Community
Enterprise Management, August 16-18, 1991, Pansol, Laguna sponsored by
Peoples Enterprise Development Council.
Sibal, Jorge, 2001, A Century of the Philippine Cooperative Movement, Co-op
News from UWCC, University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives, August
2001, http://www.wisc.edu/uwcc
Wikipedia, 2011, Fiscal Policy in the Philippines, http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiscal_policy_of_the_Philippines (Opened Aug. 2011)