Furqan Saleem
I.D 060234-036
Saleem Shahzad
I.D. 074132-033
The past few years show that increase in the road
accidents giving a red signal for public safety on road.
Past 5 years there is an alarming increase in the
accidents.
play our role in the investigation of the reasons and
Limitation
2.739a 4 .602
Pearson Chi-
Square
4.251 4 .373
Likelihood Ratio
55
N of Valid
Cases
We see that if there is any relationship between fun in
driving and different levels of age. For this purpose we
will make hypotheses and then run cross tabs in the
SPSS on the collected data.
N of Valid Cases 55
From the above chi-square test we can see that chi-square significance
value (p-value) is less than alpha (0.10) so we have sufficient evidence
to reject Ho and we will accept H1; that there is a significant
relationship between fun in driving and Age levels and we are 90%
sure about it.
We see that if there is any relationship between safety
measure and frequent accidents. For this purpose we
will make hypotheses and then run cross tabs in the
SPSS on the collected data.
N of Valid Cases 55
We see that if there is any relationship between fast
speed and frequent accidents. For this purpose we will
make hypotheses and then run cross tabs in the SPSS
on the collected data.
H = There is no significant relationship between
o
fast speed and frequent accidents
H = There is significant relationship between fast
1
speed and frequent accidents
Chi-Square Tests
N of Valid Cases 55
From the above chi-square test we can see that chi-square significance value (p-value) is not
less than alpha (0.10) so we have not sufficient evidence to reject Ho at 90% level of
confidence. This implies that there is no as such significant relationship between fast speed
and frequent accidents.
We see that if there is any relationship between
awareness of traffic rules and frequent accidents. For
this purpose we will make hypotheses and then run cross
tabs in the SPSS on the collected data.
N of Valid Cases 55
From the above chi-square test we can see that chi-square significance value (p-value)
is not less than alpha (0.10) so we have not sufficient evidence to reject Ho at 90% level
of confidence. This implies that there is no as such significant relationship between
awareness of traffic rules and frequent accidents.
We see that if there is any relationship between awareness
of traffic rules and obedience of traffic rules. For this
purpose we will make hypotheses and then run cross tabs in
the SPSS on the collected data.
N of Valid Cases 55
From the above chi-square test we can see that chi-square significance value (p-value) is less
than alpha (0.10) so we have sufficient evidence to reject Ho and we will accept H1; that there
is a significant relationship between awareness of traffic rules and obedience of traffic rules
and we are 90% sure about it.
We see that if there is any relationship between accidents
caused by respondents and violation of traffic rules. For this
purpose we will make hypotheses and then run cross tabs in
the SPSS on the collected data.
N of Valid Cases 55
From the above chi-square test we can see that chi-square significance value (p-value) is not
less than alpha (0.10) so we have not sufficient evidence to reject Ho at 90% level of
confidence. This implies that there is no significant relationship between accidents caused by
respondents and violation of traffic rules.
We see that if there is any relationship between
accidents caused by others and high beam lights. For
this purpose we will make hypotheses and then run
cross tabs in the SPSS on the collected data.
H = There is no significant relationship between
o
accidents caused by others and high beam lights
N of Valid Cases 55
From the above chi-square test we can see that chi-square significance value (p-value) is
less than alpha (0.10) so we have sufficient evidence to reject Ho and we will accept H1;
that there is a significant relationship between accidents caused by others and usage of high
beam lights and we are 90% sure about it.
We see that if there is any relationship between accidents caused
by respondent and driving under influence of medicine. For this
purpose we will make hypotheses and then run cross tabs in the
SPSS on the collected data.
Ho = There is no significant relationship between accidents
caused by respondent and driving under influence of medicine
N of Valid Cases 55
From the above chi-square test we can see that chi-square significance value (p-value) is not less than
alpha (0.10) so we have not sufficient evidence to reject Ho at 90% level of confidence. This implies that
there is no significant relationship between accidents caused by respondent and driving under the
influence of medicine.
viewing billboards. For this purpose we will make hypotheses
and then run cross tabs in the SPSS on the collected data.
N of Valid Cases 55
From the above chi-square test we can see that chi-square significance value (p-value) is
not less than alpha (0.10) so we have not sufficient evidence to reject Ho at 90% level
of confidence. This implies that there is no significant relationship between accidents
caused by respondent and viewing billboards
We see that if there is any relationship between accidents
caused by respondent and listening high volume music. For
this purpose we will make hypotheses and then run cross
tabs in the SPSS on the collected data.
Ho = There is no significant relationship between
accidents caused by respondent and listening high
volume music
H1 = There is significant relationship between accidents
caused by respondent and listening high volume music
Chi-Square Tests
N of Valid Cases 55
From the above chi-square test we can see that chi-square significance value (p-value) is
not less than alpha (0.10) so we have not sufficient evidence to reject Ho at 90% level of
confidence. This implies that there is no significant relationship between accidents
caused by respondent and listening high volume music.