S&P 500 (120 min.

)
-X-
(Z)
“c” -y-
1154 (c)?

61.8% of -w- from

-w-’s conclusion
(a)
-w- [5]

(c)
1112.3 [3] (b)
[4]
(b)
[1]

[2]

(a)
(a) 1086
(c)
-x-

(b) With 1140 being taken out, the next and last target for this
model is 1154. That level would be -w-=-y- and also an
(a)=(b) within -y-. This would produce a marginally higher
high on the S&P 500. One wonders if this is what the market
is going for: a new high that brings in a new wave buyers
before the actual conclusion?
1044.5
a

Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 S&P 500 (120 min.)
??
If 1154 doesn’t produce the reversal, then we’re likely dealing
with this shorter term model. This would require a reworking of
the medium term wave counts to see how it “fits” into the bigger (3)?
picture. This setup opens up much more near term upside.

(1)

-a-
1112.3
(2)
(b)
-x-

-w- (d)
1086
(c)
-b-

(a)
This move would be considered an
“Double Combination,” a correction (e)
that ends with a Triangle. -y-
??

(c)

Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 Dollar Index (Weekly)
“b”
89.62
This model has been excellent for giving us a feel for medium term direction,
so we will stick with it. While the DXY has clearly stopped going higher, one
(A) cannot say it has shown signs of a “reversal.” It looks like to be just
congesting nearer the highs, typically a signal that another new high is likely.

“d”
Z
81.70?
y
x

x
w

w x
77.69 “e”
“a” x (B)
y

74.33
z of “c”

The “b” wave lasted 11 weeks (54 trading days) on this chart and was very “brief” in comparison to the “c” wave
that followed. It would make sense for the “d” wave to be longer lasting to provide some “alternation.” For
instance, it if were to be 161.8% of “b”, that would make this “d” wave 88 trading days long for an 18 week move.
We’re currently on trading day 67, so maybe another 2-3 weeks to go?

Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 Dollar Index (240 min)
z of “d”
Dollar Bulls have had little to “fret over” the last few weeks. This market -c-?
seems to be congesting in a triangle type pattern while key support at
79.53 hasn’t been “sniffed” for awhile. It looks like we have another high y -a-
coming. However, the next new high could be a bull trap--the price
action on setting a new high will be crucial. Does it just slice through and
-g-
80.68
keep powering? Or, does it just poke to a new high and then reverse on
itself?

-b-?
-e-
79.53
x2? KEY SUPPORT
w -c-
-c-
-f-

-d- I have yet to see a legitimate “five wave” count for

-a- this move (y-wave) on the blogosphere, so I’ll
continue to call it a “correction” of some kind. If the
“diametric” labeling makes one queasy, then
consider it a “double.”
-b-
-a- 76.60

-b- x1

Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 This has been my model for several months now and so far there is nothing to suggest
Dollar Index (Weekly) anything different. The “b”-wave lasted 54 trading days, so an 80+ day “d” wave might be
nice “alternation.” So far, we’re only half way there, so perhaps this “d” wave persists until
early April. The minimum objective of this pattern would be 81.70, for 61.8% of “b.” A
decisive break of 81.70 would open the door to 83.71, the 78.6% of “b” target. Interestingly,
“b” the 61.8% retrace of “c” comes in at 83.78, so we may not see any strong selling until 83.70’s
89.62

(A)

REPRINTED 2/7/2009
“d”
Z
81.70 or 83.71?

y
x

w
x
x
w
77.69 “e”
“a” x (B)
y

74.33
z of “c”

There is compelling evidence that we’re in the tail end of a triangle (B)-Wave. The “a”-wave was an “elongated
flat.” These patterns exclusively show up as legs in a triangle. The “c”-wave is VERY difficult to classify as a “five,”
therefore it must be a correction, which supports a triangle idea. Lastly, the “c” was almost exactly 138.2% of “a”-
wave, which is a nice Fibonacci relationship required in a triangle.
 DISCLAIMER WARNING DISCLAIMER WARNING DISCLAIMER

This report should not be interpreted as investment advice of any

kind. This report is technical commentary only. The author is Wave Symbology
NOT representing himself as a CTA or CFA or Investment/Trading
Advisor of any kind. This merely reflects the author’s "I" or "A" = Grand Supercycle
interpretation of technical analysis. The author may or may not I or A = Supercycle
trade in the markets discussed. The author may hold positions <I>or <A> = Cycle
opposite of what may by inferred by this report. The information -I- or -A- = Primary
contained in this commentary is taken from sources the author (I) or (A) = Intermediate
believes to be reliable, but it is not guaranteed by the author as to "1“ or "a" = Minor
the accuracy or completeness thereof and is sent to you for 1 or a = Minute
information purposes only. Commodity trading involves risk and -1- or -a- = Minuette
is not for everyone. (1) or (a) = Sub-minuette
[1] or [a] = Micro
Here is what the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) [.1] or [.a] = Sub-Micro
has said about futures trading: Trading commodity futures and
options is not for everyone. IT IS A VOLATILE, COMPLEX AND
RISKY BUSINESS. Before you invest any money in futures or
options contracts, you should consider your financial experience,
goals and financial resources, and know how much you can afford
to lose above and beyond your initial payment to a broker. You
should understand commodity futures and options contracts and
your obligations in entering into those contracts. You should
understand your exposure to risk and other aspects of trading by
thoroughly reviewing the risk disclosure documents your broker is
required to give you.