Management
Supplement 6
Statistical Process
Control
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Heizer/Render
Principles of Operations Management, 7e
Operations Management, 9e
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 1
Outline
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Control Charts for Variables
The Central Limit Theorem
Setting Mean Chart Limits (x-Charts)
Setting Range Chart Limits (R-Charts)
Using Mean and Range Charts
Control Charts for Attributes
Managerial Issues and Control Charts
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 2
Outline Continued
Process Capability
Process Capability Ratio (Cp)
Process Capability Index (Cpk )
Acceptance Sampling
Operating Characteristic Curve
Average Outgoing Quality
S6 3
Learning Objectives
When you complete this supplement
you should be able to:
1. Explain the use of a control chart
2. Explain the role of the central limit
theorem in SPC
3. Build x-charts and R-charts
4. List the five steps involved in
building control charts
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 4
Learning Objectives
When you complete this supplement you
should be able to:
5. Build p-charts and c-charts
6. Explain process capability and
compute Cp and Cpk
7. Explain acceptance sampling
8. Compute the AOQ
S6 5
S6 6
Natural Variations
Also called common causes
Affect virtually all production processes
Expected amount of variation
Output measures follow a probability
distribution
For any distribution there is a measure
of central tendency and dispersion
If the distribution of outputs falls within
acceptable limits, the process is said to
be in control
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 7
Assignable Variations
Also called special causes of variation
Generally this is some change in the process
S6 8
Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps
Figure S6.1
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
Frequency
Each of these
represents one
sample of five
boxes of cereal
# #
# # #
# # # #
# # # # # # #
#
# # # # # # # # #
Weight
S6 9
Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps
Figure S6.1
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
Frequency
Weight
S6 10
Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps
Frequency
Weight
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
Variation
Weight
Shape
Weight
S6 11
Samples
Frequency
Prediction
e
Tim
Weight
Figure S6.1
S6 12
Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps
Frequency
(e) If assignable
causes are
present, the
process output is
not stable over
time and is not
predicable
?
?? ??
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
??
?
?
?
Prediction
e
Tim
Weight
Figure S6.1
S6 13
Control Charts
Constructed from historical data, the
purpose of control charts is to help
distinguish between natural variations
and variations due to assignable
causes
S6 14
Process Control
Frequency
Lower control limit
(a) In statistical
control and capable
of producing within
control limits
Upper control limit
(b) In statistical
control but not
capable of producing
within control limits
Figure S6.2
S6 15
Types of Data
Variables
Characteristics that
can take any real
value
May be in whole or
in fractional
numbers
Continuous random
variables
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
Attributes
Defect-related
characteristics
Classify products
as either good or
bad or count
defects
Categorical or
discrete random
variables
S6 16
x=
x =
n
S6 17
Distribution of
sample means
Mean of sample means = x
Beta
Standard
deviation of = =
x
n
the sample
means
Normal
Uniform
|
-3 x
-2 x
-1 x
+1 x +2 x +3 x
Figure S6.3
S6 18
Sampling Distribution
Sampling
distribution
of means
Process
distribution
of means
x=
(mean)
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
Figure S6.4
S6 19
S6 20
x
=
mean of the sample means
or a target value set for the process
z
=
number of normal standard
deviations
x =
standard deviation of the
sample means
=
/ n
=
population standard
S6 21
Hour
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mean
16.1
16.8
15.5
16.5
16.5
16.4
Hour
7
8
9
10
11
12
Mean
15.2
16.4
16.3
14.8
14.2
17.3
Out of
control
Variation due
to assignable
causes
17 = UCL
Variation due to
natural causes
16 = Mean
15 = LCL
| | | | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sample number
Variation due
to assignable
Out of
causes
control
S6 23
R
=
samples
A2 =
Table S6.1
x
=
Mean Factor
Upper Range
A2
1.880
1.023
.729
.577
.483
.419
.373
.337
.308
.266
D4
3.268
2.574
2.282
2.115
2.004
1.924
1.864
1.816
1.777
1.716
Lower
D3
0
0
0
0
0
0.076
0.136
0.184
0.223
0.284
Table S6.1
S6 25
S6 26
= x + A2R
= 12 + (.577)(.25)
= 12 + .144
= 12.144 ounces
From
Table S6.1
S6 27
LCLx
= x + A2R
= 12 + (.577)(.25)
= 12 + .144
= 12.144 ounces
UCL = 12.144
= x - A2R
= 12 - .144
= 11.857 ounces
LCL = 11.857
Mean = 12
S6 28
R Chart
Type of variables control chart
Shows sample ranges over time
Difference between smallest and
largest values in sample
S6 29
S6 30
UCL = 11.2
LCLR
LCL = 0
= D3 R
= (0)(5.3)
= 0 pounds
Mean = 5.3
S6 31
These
sampling
distributions
result in the
charts below
UCL
x-chart
LCL
(x-chart detects
shift in central
tendency)
UCL
R-chart
LCL
Figure S6.5
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 32
(Sampling mean
is constant but
dispersion is
increasing)
UCL
x-chart
LCL
UCL
R-chart
LCL
(R-chart detects
increase in
dispersion)
Figure S6.5
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 33
S6 34
S6 35
S6 36
p =
^
LCLp = p - z p^
where
^
p
z
p
n
=
=
=
=
p(1 - p)
n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
p=
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
Fraction
Defective
Sample Number
Number of Errors
Fraction
Defective
.06
.05
.00
.01
.04
.02
.05
.03
.03
.02
11
6
12
1
13
8
14
7
15
5
16
4
17
11
18
3
19
0
20
4
Total = 80
.06
.01
.08
.07
.05
.04
.11
.03
.00
.04
6
5
0
1
4
2
5
3
3
2
80
(100)(20)
= .04
p^ =
(.04)(1 - .04)
100
= .02
S6 38
Fraction defective
UCLp = 0.10
p = 0.04
10
12
14
16
18
20
LCLp = 0.00
Sample number
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 39
Fraction defective
Possible
LCLp = p - z p^ = .04 - 3(.02) =assignable
0
causes present
.11
.10
.09
.08
.07
.06
.05
.04
.03
.02
.01
.00
UCLp = 0.10
p = 0.04
10
12
14
16
18
20
LCLp = 0.00
Sample number
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 40
LCLc = c - 3 c
=
S6 41
LCLc = c - 3 c
=6-3 6
=0
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Number defective
UCLc = c + 3 c
=6+3 6
= 13.35
|
1 2
UCLc = 13.35
c= 6
| |
3 4
|
5
|
6
|
7
LCLc = 0
| |
8 9
Day
S6 42
S6 43
S6 44
S6 45
S6 46
Target
Normal behavior.
Process is in control.
S6 47
Target
Target
Trends in either
direction, 5 plots.
Investigate for cause of
progressive change.
S6 49
Target
Target
Target
Erratic behavior.
Investigate.
S6 52
Process Capability
The natural variation of a process
should be small enough to produce
products that meet the standards
required
A process in statistical control does not
necessarily meet the design
specifications
Process capability is a measure of the
relationship between the natural
variation of the process and the design
specifications
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 53
S6 54
S6 55
S6 56
capable
S6 57
S6 58
S6 59
(.251) - .250
,
(3).0005
S6 60
(.251) - .250
.250 - (.249)
,
(3).0005
(3).0005
New machine is
NOT capable
S6 61
Interpreting Cpk
Cpk = negative number
Cpk = zero
Cpk = between 0 and 1
Cpk = 1
Cpk > 1
Figure S6.8
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 62
Acceptance Sampling
Form of quality testing used for
incoming materials or finished goods
Take samples at random from a lot
(shipment) of items
Inspect each of the items in the sample
Decide whether to reject the whole lot
based on the inspection results
S6 63
Acceptance Sampling
Form of quality testing used for
incoming materials or finished goods
Take samples at random from a lot
Rejected lots can be:
(shipment) of items
Returned
to the
Inspect each of the
items in the
sample
supplier
Decide whether to reject the whole lot
Culledresults
for
based on the inspection
defectives
Only screens lots; does
drive
(100%not
inspection)
S6 64
Operating Characteristic
Curve
Shows how well a sampling plan
discriminates between good and
bad lots (shipments)
Shows the relationship between
the probability of accepting a lot
and its quality level
S6 65
Return whole
shipment
50
25
Cut-Off
0
|
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% Defective in Lot
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 66
An OC Curve
Figure S6.9
100
95
75
Probability
of
50
Acceptance
25
= 0.10
10
|
0 0
Consumers
risk for LTPD
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
|
1
Good
lots
|
2
AQL
|
3
|
4
|
5
Indifference
zone
|
6
|
7
LTPD
|
8
Percent
defective
Bad lots
S6 67
S6 68
Consumer's risk ( )
Probability of accepting a bad lot
Probability of accepting a lot when
fraction defective is below the LTPD
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 69
n = 100, c = 2
S6 70
(Pd)(Pa)(N - n)
N
where
Pd = true percent defective of the lot
Pa = probability of accepting the lot
N = number of items in the lot
n = number of items in the sample
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 71
S6 72
Automated Inspection
Modern
technologies
allow virtually
100%
inspection at
minimal costs
Not suitable
for all
situations
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
S6 73
Upper
specification
limit
(a) Acceptance
sampling (Some
bad units accepted)
(b) Statistical process
control (Keep the
process in control)
(c) Cpk >1 (Design
a process that
is in control)
Process mean,
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
Figure S6.10
S6 74