Anda di halaman 1dari 74

Operations

Management
Supplement 6
Statistical Process
Control
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Heizer/Render
Principles of Operations Management, 7e
Operations Management, 9e
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 1

Outline
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Control Charts for Variables
The Central Limit Theorem
Setting Mean Chart Limits (x-Charts)
Setting Range Chart Limits (R-Charts)
Using Mean and Range Charts
Control Charts for Attributes
Managerial Issues and Control Charts
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 2

Outline Continued
Process Capability
Process Capability Ratio (Cp)
Process Capability Index (Cpk )

Acceptance Sampling
Operating Characteristic Curve
Average Outgoing Quality

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 3

Learning Objectives
When you complete this supplement
you should be able to:
1. Explain the use of a control chart
2. Explain the role of the central limit
theorem in SPC
3. Build x-charts and R-charts
4. List the five steps involved in
building control charts
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 4

Learning Objectives
When you complete this supplement you
should be able to:
5. Build p-charts and c-charts
6. Explain process capability and
compute Cp and Cpk
7. Explain acceptance sampling
8. Compute the AOQ

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 5

Statistical Process Control


(SPC)
Variability is inherent
in every process
Natural or common
causes
Special or assignable causes

Provides a statistical signal when


assignable causes are present
Detect and eliminate assignable
causes of variation
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 6

Natural Variations
Also called common causes
Affect virtually all production processes
Expected amount of variation
Output measures follow a probability
distribution
For any distribution there is a measure
of central tendency and dispersion
If the distribution of outputs falls within
acceptable limits, the process is said to
be in control
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 7

Assignable Variations
Also called special causes of variation
Generally this is some change in the process

Variations that can be traced to a specific


reason
The objective is to discover when
assignable causes are present
Eliminate the bad causes
Incorporate the good causes

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 8

Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps

Figure S6.1
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Frequency

(a) Samples of the


product, say five
boxes of cereal
taken off the filling
machine line, vary
from each other in
weight

Each of these
represents one
sample of five
boxes of cereal

# #
# # #
# # # #
# # # # # # #
#

# # # # # # # # #

Weight
S6 9

Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps

Figure S6.1
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Frequency

(b) After enough


samples are
taken from a
stable process,
they form a
pattern called a
distribution

The solid line


represents the
distribution

Weight
S6 10

Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps

Frequency

(c) There are many types of distributions, including


the normal (bell-shaped) distribution, but
distributions do differ in terms of central
tendency (mean), standard deviation or
Figure S6.1
variance, and shape
Central tendency

Weight
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Variation

Weight

Shape

Weight
S6 11

Samples

(d) If only natural


causes of
variation are
present, the
output of a
process forms a
distribution that
is stable over
time and is
predictable
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Frequency

To measure the process, we take samples


and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps

Prediction

e
Tim

Weight
Figure S6.1

S6 12

Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps

Frequency

(e) If assignable
causes are
present, the
process output is
not stable over
time and is not
predicable

?
?? ??
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
??
?
?
?

Prediction

e
Tim

Weight
Figure S6.1

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 13

Control Charts
Constructed from historical data, the
purpose of control charts is to help
distinguish between natural variations
and variations due to assignable
causes

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 14

Process Control
Frequency
Lower control limit

(a) In statistical
control and capable
of producing within
control limits
Upper control limit

(b) In statistical
control but not
capable of producing
within control limits

(c) Out of control


Size
(weight, length, speed, etc.)
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Figure S6.2
S6 15

Types of Data
Variables
Characteristics that
can take any real
value
May be in whole or
in fractional
numbers
Continuous random
variables
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Attributes
Defect-related
characteristics
Classify products
as either good or
bad or count
defects
Categorical or
discrete random
variables
S6 16

Central Limit Theorem


Regardless of the distribution of the
population, the distribution of sample means
drawn from the population will tend to follow
a normal curve
1. The mean of the sampling
distribution (x) will be the same
as the population mean
2. The standard deviation of the
sampling distribution ( x) will
equal the population standard
deviation ( ) divided by the
square root of the sample size, n
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

x=

x =

n
S6 17

Population and Sampling


Distributions
Three population
distributions

Distribution of
sample means
Mean of sample means = x

Beta

Standard

deviation of = =
x
n
the sample
means

Normal
Uniform
|

-3 x

-2 x

-1 x

+1 x +2 x +3 x

95.45% fall within 2 x


99.73% of all x
fall within 3 x
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Figure S6.3
S6 18

Sampling Distribution
Sampling
distribution
of means
Process
distribution
of means

x=
(mean)
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Figure S6.4
S6 19

Control Charts for Variables


For variables that have
continuous dimensions
Weight, speed, length,
strength, etc.

x-charts are to control


the central tendency of the process
R-charts are to control the dispersion of
the process
These two charts must be used together
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 20

Setting Chart Limits


For x-Charts when we know
Upper control limit (UCL) = x + z x
Lower control limit (LCL) = x - z x
where

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

x
=
mean of the sample means
or a target value set for the process
z
=
number of normal standard
deviations
x =
standard deviation of the
sample means
=
/ n

=
population standard

S6 21

Setting Control Limits


Hour 1
Sample
Weight of
Number
Oat Flakes
1
17
2
13
3
16
4
18
n=9
5
17
6
16
7
15
8
17
9
16
Mean 16.1
=1
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Hour
1
2
3
4
5
6

Mean
16.1
16.8
15.5
16.5
16.5
16.4

Hour
7
8
9
10
11
12

Mean
15.2
16.4
16.3
14.8
14.2
17.3

For 99.73% control limits, z = 3


UCLx = x + z x = 16 + 3(1/3) = 17 ozs
LCLx = x - z x = 16 - 3(1/3) = 15 ozs
S6 22

Setting Control Limits


Control Chart
for sample of
9 boxes

Out of
control

Variation due
to assignable
causes

17 = UCL
Variation due to
natural causes

16 = Mean
15 = LCL
| | | | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Sample number

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Variation due
to assignable
Out of
causes
control

S6 23

Setting Chart Limits


For x-Charts when we dont know
Upper control limit (UCL) = x + A2R
Lower control limit (LCL) = x - A2R
where

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

R
=
samples
A2 =
Table S6.1
x
=

average range of the


control chart factor found in
mean of the sample means
S6 24

Control Chart Factors


Sample Size
Range
n
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12

Mean Factor

Upper Range

A2
1.880
1.023
.729
.577
.483
.419
.373
.337
.308
.266

D4
3.268
2.574
2.282
2.115
2.004
1.924
1.864
1.816
1.777
1.716

Lower
D3

0
0
0
0
0
0.076
0.136
0.184
0.223
0.284
Table S6.1

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 25

Setting Control Limits


Process average x = 12 ounces
Average range R = .25
Sample size n = 5

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 26

Setting Control Limits


Process average x = 12 ounces
Average range R = .25
Sample size n = 5
UCLx

= x + A2R
= 12 + (.577)(.25)
= 12 + .144
= 12.144 ounces
From
Table S6.1

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 27

Setting Control Limits


Process average x = 12 ounces
Average range R = .25
Sample size n = 5
UCLx

LCLx

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

= x + A2R
= 12 + (.577)(.25)
= 12 + .144
= 12.144 ounces

UCL = 12.144

= x - A2R
= 12 - .144
= 11.857 ounces

LCL = 11.857

Mean = 12

S6 28

R Chart
Type of variables control chart
Shows sample ranges over time
Difference between smallest and
largest values in sample

Monitors process variability


Independent from process mean

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 29

Setting Chart Limits


For R-Charts
Upper control limit (UCLR) = D4R
Lower control limit (LCLR) = D3R
where
R
=
average range of the
samples
D3 and D4 =
control chart factors
from Table S6.1
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 30

Setting Control Limits


Average range R = 5.3 pounds
Sample size n = 5
From Table S6.1 D4 = 2.115, D3 = 0
UCLR = D4R
= (2.115)(5.3)
= 11.2 pounds

UCL = 11.2

LCLR

LCL = 0

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

= D3 R
= (0)(5.3)
= 0 pounds

Mean = 5.3

S6 31

Mean and Range Charts


(a)
(Sampling mean is
shifting upward but
range is consistent)

These
sampling
distributions
result in the
charts below
UCL

x-chart
LCL

(x-chart detects
shift in central
tendency)

UCL

R-chart
LCL

(R-chart does not


detect change in
mean)

Figure S6.5
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 32

Mean and Range Charts


(b)
These
sampling
distributions
result in the
charts below

(Sampling mean
is constant but
dispersion is
increasing)
UCL

x-chart
LCL

(x-chart does not


detect the increase
in dispersion)

UCL

R-chart
LCL

(R-chart detects
increase in
dispersion)

Figure S6.5
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 33

Steps In Creating Control


Charts
1. Take samples from the population and
compute the appropriate sample statistic
2. Use the sample statistic to calculate control
limits and draw the control chart
3. Plot sample results on the control chart and
determine the state of the process (in or out of
control)
4. Investigate possible assignable causes and
take any indicated actions
5. Continue sampling from the process and reset
the control limits when necessary
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 34

Manual and Automated


Control Charts

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 35

Control Charts for Attributes


For variables that are categorical
Good/bad, yes/no,
acceptable/unacceptable

Measurement is typically counting


defectives
Charts may measure
Percent defective (p-chart)
Number of defects (c-chart)
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 36

Control Limits for p-Charts


Population will be a binomial distribution,
but applying the Central Limit Theorem
allows us to assume a normal distribution
for the sample statistics
UCLp = p + z p^

p =
^

LCLp = p - z p^
where
^

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

p
z
p
n

=
=
=
=

p(1 - p)
n

mean fraction defective in the sample


number of standard deviations
standard deviation of the sampling dis
sample size
S6 37

p-Chart for Data Entry


Sample Number
Number of Errors

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

p=
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Fraction
Defective

Sample Number
Number of Errors

Fraction
Defective

.06
.05
.00
.01
.04
.02
.05
.03
.03
.02

11
6
12
1
13
8
14
7
15
5
16
4
17
11
18
3
19
0
20
4
Total = 80

.06
.01
.08
.07
.05
.04
.11
.03
.00
.04

6
5
0
1
4
2
5
3
3
2
80
(100)(20)

= .04

p^ =

(.04)(1 - .04)
100

= .02
S6 38

p-Chart for Data Entry


UCLp = p + z p^ = .04 + 3(.02) = .10

Fraction defective

LCLp = p - z p^ = .04 - 3(.02) = 0


.11
.10
.09
.08
.07
.06
.05
.04
.03
.02
.01
.00

UCLp = 0.10

p = 0.04

10

12

14

16

18

20

LCLp = 0.00

Sample number
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 39

p-Chart for Data Entry


UCLp = p + z p^ = .04 + 3(.02) = .10

Fraction defective

Possible
LCLp = p - z p^ = .04 - 3(.02) =assignable
0
causes present

.11
.10
.09
.08
.07
.06
.05
.04
.03
.02
.01
.00

UCLp = 0.10

p = 0.04

10

12

14

16

18

20

LCLp = 0.00

Sample number
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 40

Control Limits for c-Charts


Population will be a Poisson distribution,
but applying the Central Limit Theorem
allows us to assume a normal distribution
for the sample statistics
UCLc = c + 3 c
where

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

LCLc = c - 3 c
=

mean number defective in the sam

S6 41

c-Chart for Cab Company


c = 54 complaints/9 days = 6 complaints/day

LCLc = c - 3 c
=6-3 6
=0
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0

Number defective

UCLc = c + 3 c
=6+3 6
= 13.35

|
1 2

UCLc = 13.35

c= 6

| |
3 4

|
5

|
6

|
7

LCLc = 0

| |
8 9

Day
S6 42

Managerial Issues and


Control Charts
Three major management decisions:
Select points in the processes that
need SPC
Determine the appropriate charting
technique
Set clear policies and procedures

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 43

Which Control Chart to Use


Variables Data
Using an x-chart and R-chart:
Observations are variables
Collect 20 - 25 samples of n = 4, or n =
5, or more, each from a stable process
and compute the mean for the x-chart
and range for the R-chart
Track samples of n observations each

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 44

Which Control Chart to Use


Attribute Data
Using the p-chart:
Observations are attributes that can
be categorized in two states
We deal with fraction, proportion, or
percent defectives
Have several samples, each with
many observations

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 45

Which Control Chart to Use


Attribute Data
Using a c-Chart:
Observations are attributes whose
defects per unit of output can be
counted
The number counted is a small part of
the possible occurrences
Defects such as number of blemishes
on a desk, number of typos in a page
of text, flaws in a bolt of cloth
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 46

Patterns in Control Charts


Upper control limit

Target

Lower control limit


Figure S6.7
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Normal behavior.
Process is in control.
S6 47

Patterns in Control Charts


Upper control limit

Target

Lower control limit


Figure S6.7
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

One plot out above (or


below). Investigate for
cause. Process is out
of control.
S6 48

Patterns in Control Charts


Upper control limit

Target

Lower control limit


Figure S6.7
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Trends in either
direction, 5 plots.
Investigate for cause of
progressive change.
S6 49

Patterns in Control Charts


Upper control limit

Target

Lower control limit


Figure S6.7
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Two plots very near


lower (or upper)
control. Investigate for
cause.
S6 50

Patterns in Control Charts


Upper control limit

Target

Lower control limit


Figure S6.7
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Run of 5 above (or


below) central line.
Investigate for cause.
S6 51

Patterns in Control Charts


Upper control limit

Target

Lower control limit


Figure S6.7
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Erratic behavior.
Investigate.
S6 52

Process Capability
The natural variation of a process
should be small enough to produce
products that meet the standards
required
A process in statistical control does not
necessarily meet the design
specifications
Process capability is a measure of the
relationship between the natural
variation of the process and the design
specifications
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 53

Process Capability Ratio


Upper Specification - Lower Specification
Cp =
6
A capable process must have a Cp of at
least 1.0
Does not look at how well the process
is centered in the specification range
Often a target value of Cp = 1.33 is used
to allow for off-center processes
Six Sigma quality requires a Cp = 2.0

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 54

Process Capability Ratio


Insurance claims process
Process mean x = 210.0 minutes
Process standard deviation = .516 minutes
Design specification = 210 3 minutes
Upper Specification - Lower Specification
Cp =
6

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 55

Process Capability Ratio


Insurance claims process
Process mean x = 210.0 minutes
Process standard deviation = .516 minutes
Design specification = 210 3 minutes
Upper Specification - Lower Specification
Cp =
6
213 - 207
=
= 1.938
6(.516)

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 56

Process Capability Ratio


Insurance claims process
Process mean x = 210.0 minutes
Process standard deviation = .516 minutes
Design specification = 210 3 minutes
Upper Specification - Lower Specification
Cp =
6
213 - 207
=
= 1.938
Process is
6(.516)

capable

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 57

Process Capability Index


Upper
Lower
Cpk = minimum of Specification - x , x - Specification
Limit
Limit

A capable process must have a Cpk of at


least 1.0
A capable process is not necessarily in the
center of the specification, but it falls within
the specification limit at both extremes
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 58

Process Capability Index


New Cutting Machine
New process mean x = .250 inches
Process standard deviation = .0005 inches
Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches
Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 59

Process Capability Index


New Cutting Machine
New process mean x = .250 inches
Process standard deviation = .0005 inches
Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches
Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches
Cpk = minimum of

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

(.251) - .250
,
(3).0005

S6 60

Process Capability Index


New Cutting Machine
New process mean x = .250 inches
Process standard deviation = .0005 inches
Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches
Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches
Cpk = minimum of

(.251) - .250
.250 - (.249)
,
(3).0005
(3).0005

Both calculations result in


.001
Cpk =
= 0.67
.0015
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

New machine is
NOT capable
S6 61

Interpreting Cpk
Cpk = negative number
Cpk = zero
Cpk = between 0 and 1
Cpk = 1
Cpk > 1
Figure S6.8
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 62

Acceptance Sampling
Form of quality testing used for
incoming materials or finished goods
Take samples at random from a lot
(shipment) of items
Inspect each of the items in the sample
Decide whether to reject the whole lot
based on the inspection results

Only screens lots; does not drive


quality improvement efforts
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 63

Acceptance Sampling
Form of quality testing used for
incoming materials or finished goods
Take samples at random from a lot
Rejected lots can be:
(shipment) of items
Returned
to the
Inspect each of the
items in the
sample
supplier
Decide whether to reject the whole lot
Culledresults
for
based on the inspection
defectives
Only screens lots; does
drive
(100%not
inspection)

quality improvement efforts

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 64

Operating Characteristic
Curve
Shows how well a sampling plan
discriminates between good and
bad lots (shipments)
Shows the relationship between
the probability of accepting a lot
and its quality level

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 65

P(Accept Whole Shipment)

The Perfect OC Curve


Keep whole
shipment
100
75

Return whole
shipment

50
25

Cut-Off

0
|

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

% Defective in Lot
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 66

An OC Curve
Figure S6.9

= 0.05 producers risk for AQL

100
95
75

Probability
of
50
Acceptance
25

= 0.10

10
|
0 0

Consumers
risk for LTPD
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

|
1

Good
lots

|
2

AQL

|
3

|
4

|
5

Indifference
zone

|
6

|
7

LTPD

|
8

Percent
defective
Bad lots
S6 67

AQL and LTPD


Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)
Poorest level of quality we are
willing to accept

Lot Tolerance Percent Defective


(LTPD)
Quality level we consider bad
Consumer (buyer) does not want to
accept lots with more defects than
LTPD
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 68

Producers and Consumers


Risks
Producer's risk ( )
Probability of rejecting a good lot
Probability of rejecting a lot when the
fraction defective is at or above the
AQL

Consumer's risk ( )
Probability of accepting a bad lot
Probability of accepting a lot when
fraction defective is below the LTPD
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 69

OC Curves for Different


Sampling Plans
n = 50, c = 1

n = 100, c = 2

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 70

Average Outgoing Quality


AOQ =

(Pd)(Pa)(N - n)
N

where
Pd = true percent defective of the lot
Pa = probability of accepting the lot
N = number of items in the lot
n = number of items in the sample
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 71

Average Outgoing Quality


1. If a sampling plan replaces all defectives
2. If we know the incoming percent
defective for the lot
We can compute the average outgoing
quality (AOQ) in percent defective
The maximum AOQ is the highest percent
defective or the lowest average quality
and is called the average outgoing quality
level (AOQL)
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 72

Automated Inspection
Modern
technologies
allow virtually
100%
inspection at
minimal costs
Not suitable
for all
situations
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

S6 73

SPC and Process Variability


Lower
specification
limit

Upper
specification
limit

(a) Acceptance
sampling (Some
bad units accepted)
(b) Statistical process
control (Keep the
process in control)
(c) Cpk >1 (Design
a process that
is in control)

Process mean,
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Figure S6.10
S6 74

Anda mungkin juga menyukai