GAS SWEETENING
PROCESS CONSTRAINTS
- CRYOGENIC PROCESSES (Ethane extraction, LNG Manufacture) CO2
Solidification at temperatures below - 70/80C
CO2 ONLY
H2S ONLY
CO2 & H2S SIMULTANEOUSLY
SELECTIVE REMOVAL OF H2S
CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
PHYSICAL ABSORPTION
PHYSICO- CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
PHYSICAL ADSORPTION
CRYOGENIC PROCESS (CO2 Removal only)
MEMBRANES
Direct Conversion To SULPHUR
CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
10
CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
11
CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
12
CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
13
14
DEA PROCESS
ADVANTAGES :
-
DISADVANTAGES :
-
SPLIT FLOW
15
MDEA PROCESS
16
MDEA PROCESS
17
CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
18
19
ADVANTAGES :
-
DISADVANTAGES :
-
20
21
22
PHYSICAL ABSORPTION
23
PHYSICAL ABSORPTION
up to 65% of CO2
light gas sweetening
regeneration by flash
up to 50% of CO2
Gas dehydration by as solvent and heat regeneration
PURISOL : LURGI
- Selective process to remove H2S even in case of low H2S/CO2 ratio
- Gas dehydration by add solvent and heat regeneration
RECTISOL : LURGI
-
ESTASOLVAN : UHDE
-
SEPASOLV-MPE : BASF
24
SELEXOL PROCESS
25
MORPHYSORB PROCESS
26
27
PHYSICAL ABSORPTION
28
29
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROCESS
30
SULFINOL PROCESS
31
CHEMICO-PHYSICAL ABSORPTION
32
SULIFINOL (SHELL)
33
SULFINOL (SHELL)
34
HYBRISOL PROCESS
35
HYBRISOL PROCESS
36
PHYSICAL ADSORPTION
37
PHYSICAL ADSORPTION
38
PHYSICAL ADSORPTION
39
CRYOGENIC PROCESS
40
CRYOGENIC PROCESS
41
42
SPREX
43
PERMEATION (Membranes)
44
MEMBRANE PROCESS
MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY
For bulk removal of CO2
45
MEMBRANE PROCESS
46
FIBER MEMBRANE
47
FIBER MEMBRANE
48
FIBER MEMBRANE
49
50
MEMBRANE PROCESS
51
MEMBRANE PROCESS
52
MEMBRANE PROCESS
53
MEMBRANE PROCESS
54
PROCESS COMPARISON
DIRECT CONVERSION
TO SULPHUR
55
PROCESS COMPARISON
ABSORPTION :
H2S + 2 Fe3+(L) -------> 2 H+ + S + 2 Fe2+(L)
REGENERATION :
1/2 O2 + H2O + 2 Fe2+(L) ------> 2 OH- + 2 Fe3+(L)
OVERALL :
H2S + 1/2 O2 -------> H2O + S
56
SULFINT (IFP)
57
FIELD OF APPLICATION
LOW FLOWRATE
LOW PRESSURE (EXCEPT SULFINT FROM IFP)
LOW H2S CONTENT ( < 1000 ppm )
LICENSORS
US FILTER ( LO-CAT)
IFP with Le Gaz Intgral (SULFINT)
SHELL ( SULFEROX )
58
PROCESS COMPARISON
GUIDE LINE
FOR PROCESS SELECTION
59
CHEMICAL ABSORPTION
ADVANTAGES
DRAWBACKS
tendency
Foaming
(except hot carbonate)
In public domain
Reasonable
solvent
cost
Extensive
industrial
of
references
steam
60
PHYSICAL ABSORPTION
ADVANTAGES
DRAWBACKS
Remove mercaptans
HC absorption
unit affected)
(Claus
Low
61
PHYSICAL ADSORPTION
ADVANTAGES
DRAWBACKS
Low corrosion
May
mercaptans
Combined
drying
regeneration
High
temperature (furnace)
remove
with
water
62
MEMBRANE
ADVANTAGES
Low
requirement
Low corrosion
Low
DRAWBACKS
water content in
produced gas
to
some
Sensitive
contaminants
No
need
of
pure
life
time
of
Low
solvent make-up
membranes (3 to 5 years)
Can be operated un Proprietary processes
manned (offshore)
63
PROCESS
NOTE
CO2 ABSORP.
BULK
REMOVAL
SENSIBLE TO
CONTAMINANT
DEA, aMDEA
HOT
CARBONTE
PHYS.
SOLVENTS
ACID
LOW
GAS
DEA, aMDEA
CONTENT
64
APPLICATION
CO2 AND H2S
ABSORPTION
PROCESS
DEA, a MDEA
PHYSICAL
SOLVENT
SELECTIVE H2S
ABSORPTION
GENERIC
MDEA, ADIP
SULFINOL
NOTE
65
HC ABSORTION
(CLAUS UNIT)
HC ABSORTION
(CLAUS UNIT)
PROCESS
NOTE
POLISHING
IRON SPONGE WASTE SOLID
ZnO
TO
BE
CHARCOAL
TREATED
DIRECT
CONVERSION
TO SULPHUR
SWEETENING
WITH
MERCAPTAN
REMOVAL
WITH NOT
FULLY
AMINE
MOLECULAR
REFERENCED
SIEVE
SULFINOL
FLOW
LOW
AND
PRESSURE
(EXCEPT
SULFINT)
66
HC ABSORTION
(CLAUS UNIT)