Anda di halaman 1dari 56

Process Validation and Change Control:

The Validation Life Cycle


and
Maintaining The Qualified State

Gamal Amer, Ph. D.

Principal
Premier Compliance Services, Inc.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

VALIDATION
Establishing documented evidence which provides
a high degree of assurance that a specific process
will consistently produce product meeting its
predetermined specifications and quality attributes
(old definition Focus on documentation Event approach)

Process Validation: The collection and evaluation


of data, from the process design stage throughout
commercial production, which establishes
scientific evidence that a process is capable of
consistently delivering quality products.
(FDA Guidance to Industry Jan 24, 2011-Focus on understanding and data collection as
well as analysis Life cycle approach)
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

FDA Guidance:
Process Validation: General
Principles and Practices
Replaces the guidance issued in 1987
Quality of the product cannot be assured by
simply inspecting or testing in-process and
finished products. It must be built into the
product-process a-priori.
Focusing exclusively on the qualification effort
without understanding the process and ensuring
the process is maintained in a state of control may
not lead to adequate assurance of quality.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

FDA Guidance To Industry


January 2011
Three Stages of Process Validation
Process Design Stage (process is defined based
on development and scale-up)
Process Performance Qualification (PPQ) Stage
(Design is confirmed as being capable of
reproducible production)
Continued Verification and improvement
(Continuously gaining assurance the process
remains in a validated state of control)
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

Regulatory Imperatives
The process and equipment must be
carefully designed and selected
You must have procedures to prevent
contamination
You must validate the process
A qualification protocol is required
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

Regulatory Imperatives (Cont.)


You must establish criteria for initiating
and performing out-of specification
investigations
Revalidation/re-qualification when there
are changes
Procedures for reprocessing
Change control and maintaining the
validated state
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

Conducting Qualification
Define critical process and utility systems (based on Risk analysis)
Ascertain correct equipment was obtained and installed correctly
Establish confidence that equipment is capable of consistently achieving
product specifications by performing adequately within the operating
limits of the process
Establish evidence that the process is both effective and reproducible
through rigorous testing and documentation
Test parts of the process that may affect product quality or may cause
variability
Summarize results
Ensure that process remains in a qualified state through verification,
maintenance, and a change control system

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

Qualification Approach
Stage 1 Information

Stage 2 Qualification

Design
Review

QMP/VMP

Manuals, P& ID,


SOPs

Protocol
Preparation
Protocol
Execution
Summary
Report
Preparation

Engineering Drawings
Specifications

IOQ (Verification), PQ

Weld Logs, Certifications,


Analytical and Integrity Tests

Executed
protocols

IOQ (Verification) &


PQ Reports

Qualification
Record

Product Data
Stage 3 Monitor & Improve

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

Validated/Qualified State
A system is in a validated/Qualified state if:

Properly qualified/validated originally.


Same equipment used.
Same procedures followed
Equipment maintained in original state.
Instruments and controls are calibrated.
Process inputs (raw material, etc.) the same.
No significant changes were made.

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

Need For Change

Process Improvement
Improved technology and science
Improved equipment
Equipment maintenance issues
Correct/Prevent Deviations & Nonconformances
Improved raw materials and intermediates
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

10

Where Do Changes Happen


Changes Happen in:
Facility, Utilities and Process
Configuration/Equipment
Material/Services and Suppliers
Procedures and Training
Could be anywhere or to any component of the
operation, Etc.

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

11

Types of Changes Encountered


Changes Can Be:
Planned
Emergency
Major
Minor

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

12

Regulatory Requirements
You must have a procedure for change
control
You must invoke the procedure each time a
change is contemplated
You must follow the procedure
You must use scientific reasoning and risk
analysis for changes and the actions to be
taken to address them
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

13

The Qualification Life Cycle


-

Qualified System

Change Control
System

Implement Change

Modified System

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

14

What is a Change Control


System?
It is a formal system which is designed not to
prevent change, but rather document and control it.
Its main purpose is to ensure that a
system/process/operation is always in a GMP
compliant and validated state, regardless of changes
made to it. It is usually implemented using a
procedure.

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

15

Importance of Change Control

Not to prevent change.


To control and document change.
Required by the regulations.
Identify GMP and validation implications.
Ascertain process remains in a state of
control.
Must be implemented using a procedure.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

16

Controlling Change
How to maintain a validated/qualified state after
change (implementing change control):
Evaluate for impact on GMP compliance.
Evaluate for impact on validation.
Knowledgeable assessment of requirements to maintain
compliance and validation (commensurate with risk
level).
Develop plan to implement requirements.
Implement requirements and maintain a compliant and
validated system.
Monitor to ensure change gave intended result and did
not introduce unexpected issues
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

17

The ASTM E2500 Process Verification


Good Engineering Practices

Company
Quality Req.

Acceptance &
Release

Verification

Regulatory
Requirements

Specification
& Design

Process
Knowledge

Requirements

Product
Knowledge

Operation &
Continuous
Improvement

Risk Management
Design Review
Change Management
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

18

Process Validation: General


Principles and Practices
Guidance to industry issued by the FDA in
January 2011.
Outlines the life cycle approach to validation.
Inline with the principles advanced in ICH Q8,
ICH Q9, ICH Q10 and in ASTM E2500.
Defines PROCESS VALIDATION as the
collection and evaluation of data, from the process
design stage throughout production, which
establishes scientific evidence that a process is
capable of consistently delivering quality
products.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

19

FDA Guidance to Industry


January 2011
Three Stages of Process Validation
Process Design Stage (process is defined based on
development and scale-up)
Process Qualification Stage (Design is confirmed
as being capable of reproducible production)
Continued Verification and improvement
(Continuously gaining assurance the process
remains in a state of control)
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

20

The Life Cycle Approach to Process


Validation
Planning &
Design (ICH Q8)
PAT

ICH Q9

Continuous
Verification &
Improvement

Implementation
& Qualification
ICH Q9, CAPA, PAT &
Change Control

ICH Q10
The Quality System

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

21

Stage 1: Process Design

Understanding the science


Understanding the risk
Building Quality into the process
Establishing Control Strategy

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

22

Stage 2: Implementation and Process


Qualification
Qualification of utilities and equipment
Process Performance Qualification (PPQ)
protocol
Protocol execution and report

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

23

Stage 3: Continued Process


Verification
(ensure process remains in a validated state of control)

Monitoring appropriate parameters to ensure


process in a state of control.
Use CAPA, PAT and change control as well as
data collected in monitoring to maintain the
validated state and continually improve the
process.
Proper maintenance of the facility, utilities, and
process equipment
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

24

Stage 3 of Guidance Stipulates


Process must remain in a state of control (or in the
Qualified/validated State)
This is accomplished by verifying that it is, through a system
to detect unplanned departures (monitoring).
If trends are observed, then you must take action to correct.
Every time you take action to correct (e.g. PAT, CAPA) you
maintain the validated state and you are improving the
operation.
Use Statistics to identify trends and review such using SME.
Quality unit to review the information.
Use data collected to identify ways to improve process.
25

Stage 3 of Guidance Stipulates


Quality unit to meet with manufacturing periodically
to evaluate data.
Monitor beyond process parameter (e.g complaints,
OOS, deviations, etc.).
Use data collected to identify ways to improve
process.
Maintenance of the facility, utility and equipment is
of critical importance for maintaining the validated
state.
26

Monitoring
Need to know the right Critical Quality
Attributes (CQAs) of product
Need to know the Critical Processing
Parameters (CPPs) which affect CQAs
Monitor the CPPs and CQAs
Insure you take actions when you see a
deviation or observe a trend.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

27

Data from variable being monitored should conform to a


random pattern around the target value, and should be within the
action limits to indicate that the system/process/condition is
under control.
Failure

Action Level

Function
*

Being

Monitored

* * *

*
*
*

Alert Level

*
Target Value

*
*
*
*
*

Alert Level

Action Level

Time
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

28

Monitoring ensures trends towards failure are identified


in time
Trend begins
Action Level

Function
*

Being

Monitored

* * *

*
*
*

*
*
Alert Level
*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
*
Alert Level
Action Level

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

29

Correct the negative trend by manipulating the proper


CPP
Begin Manipulating
CPP
Action Level

Function
Being
Monitored

* * *
*

*
*

*
*
*

* *
* * **
Alert Level
*
*
*
*
* *
***
* **
Alert Level

Action Level

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

30

PAT CAN DO IT
Product Quality= f (input property, intermediate property, processing conditions, quantity
and quality of processing input, etc.)
Result of analysis
or reading

Control signal

Process Analyzer

Computer Model
Manipulate process into
desired state

Critical
Sample/Reading

Result of analysis
or reading

Input (material, heat,


agitation, etc.)

Input

Processing step

Processing step

Processing step

Process analyzer
Product quality reading

Final step
Product of acceptable
quality
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

31

Example Monitoring data


Negative event
CAPA

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

32

CAPA
CAPA= Corrective Action Preventive
Action
A process which uses many of the existing
quality system components to ensure
process remains in a state of control.
Action is taken to correct a deviation or non
conformance (quality event), based on level
of risk.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

33

CAPA
As issues are corrected or prevented from
happening again you return the process into a
state of control and improve the process
In cases of intolerable risk action is taken to
prevent the reoccurrence of the quality event.
Many of these actions require changes, which
should be implemented after invoking the
change control system to insure system
remains in a validated state of control.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

34

CAPA
Use risk assessment and your knowledge of the
process to determine the degree of corrective
and preventive action to be taken.
The level of effort, its formality and the level
of documentation should be commensurate
with the level of risk and be based on science.
Many of the actions taken correct or prevent a
processing problem require changes to the
operation-Use Change Control to manage
them.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

35

Change Control System


Change
Identified

GMP
Issues?

YES

YES

Emergency?

NO
NO

Implement as
Maintenance
Obtain
Approvals

Implement
Compliance
Requirements

Document
Change

Initiate
Change
Control

Implement
Change

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

36

Change Control Procedure


Initiate change (simple form with
justification, technical information and drawings).

Review and approval (quality unit, user


group, engineering, validation professional,
regulatory affairs, safety and environmental).

Identify GMP implications


All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

37

Change Control Procedure


(cont.)
Define what is needed to make the
change permanent.

Identify revalidation requirements, if


any, and implement.
Change permanent.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

38

Initiating Change
A short and concise form
Should have space for comments and
approvals
Should have all information needed to
render judgment
Should have space to define requirements
for implementing change
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

39

Change Request Form


Page 1

Originators Information
Date
Short Title
Reason for Requesting Change
Description of Requested Change
Known or Suspected GMP Implications
Add support documentation and/or drawings
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

40

Change Request Form


Page 2
Review, Requirements, and Approval
Technical review and comments by engineering,
technical services, operation, regulatory, safety,
environmental, and QA-recommend approval/disapproval
Review and approval by Change Control Committee
(needed if disagreements occur above)
Define requirements to be satisfied for change
implementation; validation, document or drawing
modification, procedure modification, etc.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

41

Change Control procedure


Change required

Generate
Change Request

GMP
Implications?

No

Implement Change
Maintenance

End

Yes
Requalification?
Revalidation?

No

Implement Change
& Insure GMP
Requirements Done

Issue GMP
Report

Obtain
Approvals

Change is
Permanent

Obtain Approval

Yes
Requalify
Revalidate &
Issue Reports

Change is
Permanent

End

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

42

Emergency Changes
Implement Change
Fill out paper work and circulate for comments
and approval (within 48 hours)
Implement GMP required actions immediately
Release is contingent on additional testing and
implementation of GMP requirements.
Keep a close eye on the lots released once
distributed and facilitate fast customer feedback.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

43

Post Change Monitoring and its


Importance
Once change is implemented and becomes
permanent you must continue to monitor the
changed part to ensure
a) change achieved its objective and
b) that no unintended issues arise.

Do a lot of monitoring in the beginning to


establish background information, then scale back
to a statistically appropriate level.
Look at variation for the batch and also for batch
to batch variations.
Always be quantitative and use statistical methods
when ever possible.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

44

Data from post change monitoring should conform to a random


pattern around the target value, and should be within the action
limits to indicate that the system/process/condition is under
control.
Failure

Action Level

Function
*

Being

Monitored

* * *

*
*
*

Alert Level

*
*
*
*
*

Alert Level

Action Level

Time
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

45

Make sure data does not show trending towards failure


Post Change?

Action Level

Function
*

Being

Monitored

* * *

*
*
*

*
*
Alert Level
*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
*
Alert Level
Action Level

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

46

Example Monitoring data


Address as Deviation -CAPA

Thanks Brian Nunnally

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

47

Trends and Not Single Event


CAPA

Thanks Brian Nunnally

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

48

ASTM E2500 View of Change Control

Copied with permission D. Petko, Presentation to ISPE


Delaware Valley Chapter, April 2008

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

49

Maintenance the Third Leg


Maintenance is defined as all actions which
have the objective of retaining or restoring
an item in or to a state in which it can
perform its required function

All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

50

Maintenance the Third Leg


Ensure equipment remain viable throughout
the life of the product (continue to use the
same equipment)
Maintaining the facility and equipment for
both utility and process in their original
condition to ensure they still operate as
originally intended
Proper maintenance ensures equipment does
not contaminate, or introduce objectionables
into, the product.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

51

Maintenance the Third Leg


Types of maintenance:
Preventive Scheduled - Planned
Corrective Unscheduled - Unplanned

Preventive maintenance is the routine recurring


work required to keep a facility, equipment,
utilities and other production related systems in
such condition that it may be continuously
used, at its original or designed capacity and
efficiency for its intended purpose
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

52

Maintenance the Third Leg


Preventive maintenance is implemented using
procedures and a schedule with proper ticklers.
Normally it is based on equipment
Manufacturers recommendations
Preventive maintenance is designed to avoid
failure of equipment unexpectedly
Electronic systems used to support preventive
maintenance programs should be part 11
compliant and validated.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

53

Maintenance the Third Leg


Corrective maintenance requires experienced
personnel familiar with the equipment
Corrective maintenance results in down time
and possibly product failure
Maintaining a stock of common
replacement/spare parts can help with quick
resolution of more common and known
maintenance problems and thus maintaining
the operation in a state of control
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

54

Maintenance the Third Leg


Replacing equipment, as a maintenance
approach, should implemented through
change control if such replacement has a
GMP or a Validation impact.
Maintenance is a regulatory required activity to
ensure the process remains viable and in a state
of control.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

55

In Summary
You must always maintain your processes in a GMP compliant
and validated state
This can be achieved by monitoring the process to identify
trends and correcting them, by having a change control system
in place, and by properly maintaining your equipment and
facility.
Monitoring, change control, and proper maintenance of your
facility & equipment are regulatory requirements.
Change control as well as maintenance are implemented using
procedures.
You must invoke the change control system every time you
contemplate a change to an approved and validated process.
The change control system should not be designed to prevent
making changes to your operation, but rather to control and
document such changes.
All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission.

56

Anda mungkin juga menyukai