SAXENA
-KAMINI SINGH
-ANANT PRATAP SINGH
-VIDHU VAIBHAV
-KUSHAGRA
CLASSIFICATION OF MODERN
BUILDINGS
BASED ON OCCUPANCY:1)
GROUP A Residential
2)
GROUP B Educational
3)
GROUP C Institutional
4)
GROUP D Assembly
5)
GROUP E Business
6)
GROUP F Mercantile
7)
GROUP G Industrial
8)
GROUP H Storage
9)
GROUP I Hazardous
AMOUNT OF WATER
PER HEAD PER DAY
(liters)
Bathing
Washing cloths
55
20
Flushing of W.C.
Washing the house
30
10
Washing of utensils
Cocking
10
5
Drinking
TOTAL
135
MODES OF WASTAGE OF
WATER
1.
2.
3.
FOR
SANITATION SERVICES
DEF: Modern civilization has brought up better hyginic
and sanitary habits which need quick disposal of
wastes of all types. In the material consuming society
the waste of all kind shall be naturally very high and
need careful considerations during planning stage
itself.
Human waste
Animal and vegetable waste
Waste due to natural calamities and seasonal changes.
IMPROPER METHODS OF
WASTAGE DISPOSAL, It includes:
Biological Pollutants:
SICK BUILDING
BUILDING CHARACTER
1.
2.
COMFORT
ENERGY CONSERVATION
They are related and restricted to each other, In
general to improve indoor comfort will consume
more energy, BUT the ENERGY EFFICIENT
BUILDINGS will provide more comfort with low
energy.
In last 20 years energy saving measures have been
concieved, develouped and implemented in
building enveloup system and also there
associated environmental control systems such as
light, ventilation, heating and cooling system.
ACTIVE SYSTEM
PASSIVE SYSTEM
The approaches to go to
the ultimate energy
efficiency
1.
Climate: Composite
Year of start/completion:1998/99
Cost:
Infrastructure (electrical, plumbing, HVAC, lift, fuel oil tank, pumps and tube
wells) Rs 24 million
Civil, false ceiling, strong rooms, steel pergola at entrance Rs 30.7 million
Landscaping Rs 0.35 million
Design features:
the loss of strength and stiffness of the materials resulting from the
fire, combined with the initial impact damage, would have caused a
failure of the truss system supporting a floor, or the remaining
perimeter columns, or even the internal core.
Failure of the flooring system would have subsequently allowed the
perimeter columns to buckle outwards.
, it would have resulted in the complete collapse of at least one
complete storey at the level of impact.
Once one storey collapsed all floors above would have begun to fall.
The huge mass of falling structure would gain momentum, crushing
the structurally intact floors below,
resulting in catastrophic failure of the entire structure.
While the columns at say level 50 were designed to carry the static
load of 50 floors above, once one floor collapsed and the floors
above started to fall.
THANK YOU!