Cruelty To Elderly
Mudit Singhal
15BM60032
Akhil Verma
15BM60041
Prabhat Choudhary 15BM60071
Aditya Soni
15BM60081
Piyush Sharma
15BM60090
Abstract
INTRODUCTORY MOVIE
Physical abuse
Sexual Abuse
Domestic Violence
Psychological Abuse
Financial Abuse
Neglect
Physical Abuse:
Sexual Abuse:
older person.
Domestic Violence:
Psychological Abuse:
Financial Abuse:
Neglect:
(Cavanaugh &
CASES ANALYSED
CASE
PERPETRA
TOR
Family
PLACE
HARM
CHARGES
OUTCOME
Home
Materi
al Loss
Illegal
possession of
property
Conviction
B.Ramasamy vs
Jeyakrishnan
Family
Home
Materi
al Loss
Illegal
possession of
property
Perpetrator
released
Devaky vs
Unnikrishnan
Family
Home
Financi
al loss
Neglect
Liability
People v Racy
Stranger
Home
Injury
Elder Abuse
Conviction
reversed
Contreras v
Texas
Stranger
Home
Injury
Assault
Conviction
reversed
People v Suazo
Stranger
Workplace
Injury
Assault
Conviction
reversed
Kulwant Singh
vs Laljee Kent
CASE I
Defendant:
Man broke into the home of an elderly couple, beat the husband and wife,
and robbed them
Charges:
Robber
Event description:
Elderly Couple
Initial Judgement:
Jury at the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas found him guilty on
all counts and assessed prison terms
CASE I ( Contd..)
Defendant action
Challenged the injury to- an-elderly statute contending that it violated the Texas
and Federal Constitutions because it inadequately notified a citizen of the
forbidden conduct.
Argued that the problem was that the statute lacked a necessary mens rea;
therefore, it potentially punished innocent conduct.
At the time relevant to this case, the injury-to-an-elderly-person statute provided
that a person committed an offense if he intentionally or knowingly engaged in
conduct that caused serious bodily injury to an individual who was sixty-five years
of age or older.
The defendant argued that, as written, the statute did not require the actor to
intend the result of his conduct, and therefore the actor could intentionally
perform some act without intending the result and be held strictly liable for the
result of the innocent act.
Final Judgement:
The Court of Appeals of Texas for the Thirteenth District agreed with this argument
The charge required the jury to find that the defendant intended, or knew, the
result of his conduct, and thus it prevented the jury from convicting him for
conduct which was not criminal.
The court reversed the defendant's robbery conviction for lack of proof.
CASE II
Defendant:
Facts:
CASE II ( Contd..)
Plaintiffs arguments:
Offered to care for his grandson while other 2 defendants lived in the middle east
When they returned, the plaintiff agreed to give them 2 bedrooms to live. Condition- The defendants must
not create problems in relation to common areas
Deteriorating health (He suffers from angina, and pectoris of the heart and his wife from Parkinson's disease)
Plot was purchased by the plaintiff with his funds and all floors were constructed by his funds
Claims that the plaintiff borrowed money from him to construct. (plaintiff asserts having returned the money
to the latter)
In Municipal property tax returns filed by the plaintiff, the first defendant was shown as a co-owner with the
plaintiff
Says no son gives a loan to his father, and that all money was given on the understanding that he would be
permitted to live in the ground floor of the building
Acknowledged that there was no material or document in support of the claim of oral partition with the
plaintiff
Judgment:
The defendant does not have any record in writing or in any document or letter, with any partition with the
plaintiff
Even if the defendant gave money for construction, the onus of establishing ownership rights lies squarely
with him
The defendants are directed, to handover one of the bedrooms in their possession, to the plaintiff, within two
weeks. The defendants shall bear the costs of proceedings, quantified at Rs. 30,000/- to be paid to the
plaintiff.
Judgement of Cases
Select case only after evaluating each cases on the basis of every
mentioned parameter
Identifying And Evaluating The Actions Taken during Litigation By Both Parties
Identify the actions taken by both party during litigation and purpose of
these actions
Brainstorming And Evaluating The Alternative Course Of Action
Try to find out alternative actions that could have been taken
Studying The Consequences Of Actions Taken
Identify the findings and enlist the learning from the particular case
a.
b.
Protective Measures
Find out about community resources before you need them such as rape and abuse
hotlines, senior centers, and adult protective services
Recommendations