EOQ Assumptions
1. Instantaneous production.
2. Immediate delivery.
3. Deterministic demand.
WW model relaxes this one
4. Constant demand.
5. Known fixed setup costs.
6. Single product or separable products.
decision variables
Wagner-Whitin Example
Data
t
Dt
ct
At
ht
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
20 50 10 50 50 10 20 40 20 30
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lot-for-Lot Solution
t
Dt
Qt
It
Setup cost
Holding cost
Total cost
1
20
20
0
100
0
100
2
50
50
0
100
0
100
3
10
10
0
100
0
100
4
50
50
0
100
0
100
5
50
50
0
100
0
100
6
10
10
0
100
0
100
7
20
20
0
100
0
100
8
40
40
0
100
0
100
9
20
20
0
100
0
100
10
30
30
0
100
0
100
Total
300
300
0
1000
0
1000
1
20
100
80
100
80
180
2
50
0
30
0
30
30
3
4
5
10 50 50
0 100 0
20 70 20
0 100 0
20 70 20
20 170 20
6
7
8
10 20 40
0 100 0
10 90 50
0 100 0
10 90 50
10 190 50
9
20
0
30
0
30
30
10 Total
30 300
0 300
0
0
0 300
0 400
0 700
Wagner-Whitin Property
Under an optimal lot-sizing policy either the inventory carried to
period t+1 from a previous period will be zero or the production
quantity in period t+1 will be zero.
Wagner-Whitin Example
Step 1: Obviously, just satisfy D1 (note we are neglecting production
cost, since it is fixed).
Z1* A1 100
j1* 1
Z 2* min
Z 3* min Z1* A2 h2 D3 ,
produce in 2
Z*2 A3 ,
produce in 3
100 1(50) (1 1)10 170
Z 4* min
*
Z
2 A3 h3 D4 ,
Z*3 A4 ,
produce in 3
produce in 4
min
270
j4* 4
300
270
Z min
*
5
*
produce in 5
Z 4 A5 ,
170 100 1(50) 320
min
270 100
320
j5* 4
And so on.
370
Produce in period 1
for 1, 2, 3 (20 + 50 +
10 = 80 units)
10
520
520
580
520
610
580
610
620
580
7 or 8
Produce in period 4
Produce in period 8
for 4, 5, 6, 7 (50 + 50 + for 8, 9, 10 (40 + 20 +
10 + 20 = 130 units)
30 = 90 units
Inventory
Q
r
l
Time