Anda di halaman 1dari 53

ORGANIZING

UNIT-2

What is Organizing

The grouping of activities necessary for attaining


objective.
The process of creating an organizations
Structure .
A Process that initiates implementation of plans by
clarifying jobs and working relationship and effectively
deploying resources for attainment of identified and
desired results

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

Definition
Organizing is the process of identifying and
grouping the work to be performed, defining
and delegating responsibility and authority,
and establishing relationships for the
purpose of enabling people to work most
effectively together in accomplishing
objectives.

Louis Allen
April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

Importance of Organizing
Benefits of specialization
Clarity in working relationships
Optimum utilization of resources
Adaptation to change
Development of personnel
Expansion and growth

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

NATURE OF ORGANIZATION
Division of labor
Coordination
Social system
Objective
Cooperative relationship
Well defined hierarchy
Communication

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

Purposes of Organizing

Divide work to be done into specific jobs and


Departments
Assign tasks and responsibilities associated with
individual
Coordinates diverse organizational tasks.
Clusters job in to Units.
Establish relationship among individuals , group , and
departments .
Allocates and deploys organizational resources .

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

Organization levels

Top level management


Middle level management
Supervisory level of operating management

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

Top management:

It consists of managers at the highest level


in the management hierarchy.
Chief executive

Department
managers
supervisors

workers

April 27, 2016

top management
middle management

first line management


operative workforce

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

Middle management:
this level consist of departmental managers. the main function performed by
this level of managers consists of linking the top and supervisory level of
management.

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

Supervisory management:
The lowest level of management consist of
first line supervisors.
It ensure that it is of required quality and is
completed on time.

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

10

Types of organizations:
Based on function or purpose
Based on primary beneficiary
Based on control or compliance
Based on relations
Based on structure

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

11

Designing Organizational
Structure

Organizational Design

A process involving decisions about six key elements:

April 27, 2016

Work specialization
Departmentalization
Chain of command
Span of control
Centralization and decentralization
Formalization

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

12

Purposes of Organizing

Divides work to be done into specific jobs and departments.

Assigns tasks and responsibilities associated with individual jobs.

Coordinates diverse organizational tasks.

Clusters jobs into units.

Establishes relationships among individuals, groups, and departments.

Establishes formal lines of authority.

Allocates and deploys organizational resources

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

13

Organizational Structure

Work Specialization
The

degree to which tasks in the organization


are divided into separate jobs with each step
completed by a different person.
Overspecialization can result in human
diseconomies from boredom, fatigue, stress,
poor quality, increased absenteeism, and
higher turnover.
April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

14

Departmentalization by Type

Functional

Grouping jobs by
functions performed
Grouping jobs by
product line

Geographical

Process

Product

Grouping jobs on the


basis of product or
customer flow

Customer

Grouping jobs by type of


customer and needs

Grouping jobs on the


basis of territory or
geography
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education,
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

915

Organizational Structure
(contd)

Chain of Command
The

continuous line of authority that extends


from upper levels of an organization to the
lowest levels of the organization and clarifies
who reports to whom.

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education,


Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

916

Organizational Structure (contd)

Authority
The

rights inherent in a managerial position to tell


people what to do and to expect them to do it.

Responsibility
The

obligation or expectation to perform.

Unity of Command
The

concept that a person should have one boss


and should report only to that person.
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education,
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

917

Exhibit 93 Contrasting Spans of Control

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education,


Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

918

Organizational Structure (contd)

Centralization
The

degree to which decision making is concentrated at upper


levels in the organization.

Organizations in which top managers make all the decisions and lowerlevel employees simply carry out those orders.

Decentralization
Organizations

in which decision making is pushed down to the


managers who are closest to the action.

Employee Empowerment
Increasing

the decision-making authority (power) of employees.


Copyright 2010 Pearson Education,
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

919

Common Organizational Designs

Traditional Designs
Simple

structure

Low departmentalization, wide spans of control,


centralized authority, little formalization

Functional

Departmentalization by function

Operations, finance, marketing, human resources, and


product research and development

Divisional

structure

structure

Composed of separate business units or divisions


with limited autonomy under the coordination and
Copyright corporation.
2010 Pearson Education,
control the parent
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

920

Exhibit 97 Strengths and Weaknesses of Traditional


Organizational Designs

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education,


Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

921

Exhibit 98 Contemporary Organizational Designs


Team Structure
What it is:

A structure in which the entire organization is made up of


work groups or teams.

Advantages:

Employees are more involved and empowered. Reduced


barriers among functional areas.

Disadvantages:

No clear chain of command. Pressure on teams to perform.

Matrix-Project Structure
What it is:

A structure that assigns specialists from different functional


areas to work on projects but who return to their areas when
the project is completed. Project is a structure in which
employees continuously work on projects. As one project is
completed, employees move on to the next project.

Advantages:

Fluid and flexible design that can respond to environmental


changes. Faster decision making.

Disadvantages:

Complexity of assigning people to projects. Task and


personality conflicts.
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education,
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

922

Organizing Process

Identifying, analyzing and classifying the activities


necessary to accomplish the objectives
Grouping these activities in the light of human and
material resources available and the best way under
the circumstances , of using them
Delegation of authority (Assignment of duties )
Horizontal and vertical coordination of authority and
information relationship

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

23

Organizing Process
Feasibility studies and feedback

IDENTIFICATION
AND
CLASSIFICATION
OF
REQUIREDS
ACTIVITIES

April 27, 2016

GROUPING
OF ACTIVITIES IN
THE LIGHT OF
RESOURCES AND
SITUATIONS

DELEGATION
OF AUTHORITY

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

HORIZONTAL
AND VERTICAL
COORDINATION OF
AUTHORITY AND
INFORMATION
RELATIONSHIP

24

Common Errors In Organizing

Unnecessary Lengthy Chain of Command


Unsatisfactory Work Division
Lack of parity between the Authority and
Responsibility
Lack of Coordination and Control
Failure to Classify Relationship
Confusion of authority and relationship with
Informal Organization
April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

25

Formal and Informal


Organization

Formal Organization
The

Formal Organization is a system of


well-defined jobs, each bearing a definite
measure of authority, responsibility and
accountability.
Louis Allen
Formal Organization is a system of
consciously coordinated activities of two or
more persons toward a common objective.
Chester Barnard
April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

27

Features

It is deliberately designed by the top management


It places more emphasis on work to be performed than
interpersonal relationships among the employees.
It specifies the relationships among various job positions and
the nature of their inter-relationship.
It lays down rules and procedures essential for achievement of
objective
Efforts of various departments are coordinated, interlinked and
integrated through the formal organisation.

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

28

Formal Organizations

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

29

Features

It is deliberately designed by the top management


It places more emphasis on work to be performed than
interpersonal relationships among the employees.
It specifies the relationships among various job
positions and the nature of their inter-relationship.
It lays down rules and procedures essential for
achievement of objective
Efforts of various departments are coordinated,
interlinked and integrated through the formal
organisation.

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

30

Advantages
Easier to fix Responsibility
No ambiguity in the role . This also helps
in avoiding duplication of effort.
Behavior of Employee fairly predicted
Unity of command through an established
chain of command
Stability to the organization

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

31

Limitations

The formal communication may lead to procedural


delays
Do not provide adequate recognition to creative talent
More emphasis on Structure and Work, difficult to
understand all human relationships in an enterprise as
it places

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

32

Informal Organization
An

Informal organization is an aggregate of


interpersonal relationships without any conscious
purpose but which may contribute to joint results.
Chester Barnard
Informal organization is a network of
interpersonal relationship that arise when people
associate with one another .
Keith Davis

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

33

Features

Originates from within the formal organisation as a


result of personal interaction among employees.
The standards of behavior evolve from group norms.
Independent channels of communication without
specified direction of flow of information are
developed by group members.
Emerges spontaneously and is not deliberately
created by the management.

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

34

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

V
35

Chess group

Cricket lovers

Bowling Team

Morning coffeee regulars

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

36

Advantages:

It helps to fulfill the social needs .


Sense of belongingness in the organisation
Faster spread of information as well as quick
feedback.
It contributes towards fulfillment of
organizational objectives. For example,
employees reactions towards plans and policies
can be tested through the informal network.

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

37

Disadvantages:

It spreads rumors. This may work against the interest


of the formal organisation.
The management may not be successful in
implementing changes if the informal organisation
opposes them. Such resistance to change may delay
or restrict growth.
It pressurizes members to conform to group
expectations.

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

38

Formal and Informal organisation: A


Comparative view
Meaning
Origin
Authority
Behavior
Flow of Communication
Nature
Leadership

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

39

Delegation of Authority

By means of delegation,the manager


extends his area of operations,for without
delegation,his actions are confined to what
he himself can perform.

Features

Delegation is authorisation to a manager to act in a


certain manner.
Delegation has dual characteristics.
Authority once delegated can be enhanced,reduced,or
withdrawn .
Delegation of authority is always to the position created
through the process of organising.
A manager delegates authority out of the authority
vesting in him.
Delegation of authority may be specific or general.

Steps in delegation
Determination of results expected.
Assignments of duties.
Authorisation for action.
Creation of obligation.

Principles of delegation
Delegation by results expected.
Functional definition.
Clarity of lines of authority.

a) scaler chain.

b) unity of command.
Level of authority.
Absoluteness of responsibility.
Parity of authority and responsibility.

B) Factors in delegant
(subordinate);

Subordinates are expected to exercise less authority in


the following situations:1) when they fear harsh criticism for
unfavourable results.
2) when they lack self confidence.
3) when they lack resources.
4) when they have inadequate positive incentives;and
5) when their superior is easily available for making
decisions on their part.

Blocks to effective delegation

A) Factors in delegator (superior):


1) love for authority.
2) maintenance of tight control.
3) fear of subordinates.
4) fear of exposure.
5) attitude towards subordinates.
6) personality of superior.

Defining controlling
Process that managers go through to control.
Process of making things happen as planned.

**** According to Roberto Mockler controlling is a


systematic effort by business management to compare
performance to predetermined standards, plans or
objectives to determine whether performance is in line
with these standards and presumably to take any
remedial action required to see that human and other
corporate resources are being used in the most
effective and efficient way possible in achieving
corporate objectives.

THE CONTROLLING
SUBSYSTEM
Can be viewed as a subsystem of the
over-all management system.
The purpose of this subsystem is to help
managers enhance the success of the
overall management system through
effective controlling.

THE THREE MAIN STEPS IN


CONTROLLING PROCESS
1.
2.
3.

Measuring performance
Comparing measured performance to
standards
Taking correlative action

1.
2.
3.
4.

Work
continues
Measure
performance

New work
situation begins

Man
Money
Machine
Materials

No
correlative
action
Compare
measurement to
necessary
standards
Take correlative action:
change plans,
organization, or
influencing methods

Performance
equivalent to
standards

Performance
significantly different
from standards

Making Controlling Successful


Specific organizational activities being
focused on
Different kinds of organizational goals
Timely corrective action
Communication of the mechanics of the
control process

Importance of controlling
Controlling helps in achieving the objective
Efficient use of resource
Facilities decision making
Improve employee morale
Helps in achieving better coordination
Helps in better planning

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

51

Process of controlling
Key areas to be monitored
Establishing standards
Measuring performance
Compare performance with standards
Take no action, if performance is in
harmony with standards

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

52

Methods of controlling
Feedback control
Concurrent control
Preventive control

April 27, 2016

NATURE OF ORGANIZING

53

Anda mungkin juga menyukai