Anda di halaman 1dari 60

Method Validation

By

Muhammad Imran Shaukat

April 2015

Muhammad Imran Shaukat

1/60

Method Validation what is it

Specific intended use why are you analysing the samples and
what are the resulting data used for Objective evidence set of
results from validation studies Confirmation compare
information obtained with customers requirements

2/60

Method Validation when is it require????

Non-standard methods
Laboratory-developed methods

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

3/60

5.4

Test and calibration methods and validation

5.4.1 General
5.4.2 selection of method
5.4.3 Laboratory Developed Method
5.4.4 Non Standard Method
5.4.5 Validation of Method
5.4.5.1 Validation What is it
5.4.5.2 Validation of Non Standard Method
5.4.5.3 Range and Accuracy of the Values obtained
5.4.6 Estimation of Uncertainty
5.4.6.1 Apply Procedure for Estimation Uncertainty
5.4.6.2 Apply Rigorous Metrological and Statistical Calculation
5.4.6.3 All Uncertainty Components must be Taken into Methods of
accreditation

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

4/60

What is a Method?
A method is a procedure for the analysis of a specific analyte

( for example determination of Mn in water)/Procedure for


calibration or measurement of a specific parameter

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

5/60

Definition
Validation is the confirmation by examination
and
provision of objective evidence that the particular
requirements for a specific intended use are fulfilled
(ISO/IEC 17025 clause 5.4.5.1)
Verification confirmation, through the
provision of
objective evidence, that specified requirements have
been fulfilled (ISO 9000: 2005)
Note: intended use vs specified requirements
Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

6/60

5.4.1 GENERAL

Standard Method should be used and labs


should verify their own ability to achieve
satisfactory performance against documented
performance

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

7/60

The laboratory shall do estimation of the measurement


uncertainty (where applicable )as well as statistical
techniques for analysis of test and/or calibration data.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

8/60

5.4.2 SELECTION OF

METHODS

Lab must be able to select / identify appropriate method


to be used. The other qualification of the lab such as
training records / test demonstration can also add to the
labs ability.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

9/60

The laboratory shall use test and/or calibration methods, including


methods for sampling, which meet the needs of the customer and
which are appropriate for the tests and/or calibrations it undertakes.
Methods published in international, regional or national standards
shall preferably be used

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

10/60

The laboratory shall ensure that it uses the latest valid edition of a

standard unless it is not appropriate or possible to do so. When


necessary, the standard shall be supplemented with additional details
to ensure consistent application.
When the customer does not specify the method to be used, the

laboratory shall select appropriate methods that have been published


either in international, regional or national standards, or by
reputable technical organizations, or in relevant scientific texts or
journals, or as specified by the manufacturer of the equipment

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

11/60

5.4.3 LABORATORY DEVELOPED METHOD


In house development method must be validated and
authorized before use this simple statement has
significant impact on laboratory. To achieve this certified
reference material (CRM) should be used to determine
any systematic bias if not available /possible results
must be compared with the other technique preferably
based on different principle of analysis.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

12/60

5.4.4 NON STANDARD METHOD


The client must be told total agreement of use of non

standard methods.
The method must be appropriately validated, the method
such developed must include the following information.
Appropriate
Revision of document

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

13/60

Use of Standard Method beyond applicable range

Validation is also required when Standard


Method is used outside their normal practice

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

14/60

Non standard method

When it is necessary to use methods not covered by


standard methods, these shall be subject to
agreement with the customer and shall include a clear
specification of the customers requirements and the
purpose of the test and/or calibration. The method developed
shall have been validated appropriately before use.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

15/60

Non standard method

Nov 2014

procedures should contain at least the following information:


appropriate identification
scope;
description of the type of item to be tested or calibrated;
parameters or quantities and ranges to be determined;
apparatus and equipment, including technical performance
requirements;
reference standards and reference materials required

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

16/60

5.4.5 VALIDATION OF METHOD

Validation is the confirmation by examination and


provision of objective evidence that the particular
requirement for a specific test / intended use are fulfilled

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

17/60

VERIFICATION OF A METHOD

Verification is the confirmation by examination and


provision of objective evidence that the particular
requirements have been fulfilled

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

18/60

Validation

Should be performed

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

IF ?

19/60

New Equipment
When a lab inducts new equipment validation
must be performed to prove that the lab is
capable of getting a valid result before
performing rest for the client

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

20/60

Critical component of Equipment is replaced

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

21/60

When Internal Control Shows that analytical


result is out of statistical control

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

22/60

When participation in ILC shows that method


exceeds the statistical limits

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

23/60

New test

Validation is required when a lab performs a test for the


first time

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

24/60

PARAMETERS FOR METHOD VALIDATION

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

25/60

How to determine performance of a method


The following techniques "as it is" and in combination are
used
Calibration using reference material
Comparison of results achieved with other methods
Inter-laboratory Comparison
Systematic assessment of the factors influencing the
results
Assessment of uncertainty based on scientific/statistical
principles
Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

26/60

PARAMETERS FOR METHOD VALIDATION


Accuracy
Sensitivity
The range
Linearity
recovery
PRECISION//repeatability and/or reproducibility
detection limit
Selectivity /Specificity of the method
Robustness against external influences and/or cross-sensitivity

against interference from the matrix of the sample/test object), as


assessed for the intended use, shall be relevant to the customers'
needs.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

27/60

ACCURACY

Accuracy
Accuracy is the closeness of the analytical value
to the true value (Eurachem )

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

28/60

Accuracy
Accuracy is the measure of exactness of
an analytical method, or the closeness of
agreement between the measured value
and the value that is accepted as a
conventional true value or an accepted
reference value.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

29/60

Sensitivity
This is the change in the analytical response
divided by the corresponding change in the
concentration of a standard (calibration) curve,
i.e. the slope of the analytical calibration curve.
A method is said to be sensitive if a small
change in concentration of the analyte
causes a large change in the analytical
measurement.
Gradient of the calibration curve !!!
Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

30/60

Specificity/Selectivity

The Specificity of a method defines the ability of the


method to measure the analyte of interest to the
exclusion of other relevant components.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

31/60

Selectivity

Selectivity describes the ability of an analytical


method to differentiate various substances in a
sample.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

32/60

Specificity
Specify those substances which might be expected to

give rise to an interfering signal.

A check for random interferences should be performed

by analysis of a set of representative blank samples.

indicate the extent to which the method can distinguish

between the analyte of interest and interfering


substances

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

33/60

PRECISION
The precision of procedure expresses the closeness of
agreement (degree of scatter) between a series of
measurements obtained from multiple sampling of the
homogenous sample under the prescribed conditions.
Precision may be considered
at three levels:
repeatability, intermediate precision and reproducibility.
Precision should be investigated using homogenous,
authentic (full scale) samples. However if it is not
possible to obtained a full scale sample it may be
investigated or bench-top scale sample solution.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

34/60

Following terms express precision:


a. Repeatability: Repeatability expresses the precision
under the same operating condition under a short interval
of time.
Repeatability is also termed intra- assay
precision.

b.

Reproducibility: Reproducibility expresses the


precision between laboratories (collaborative studies
usually applied to standardization of methodology)
c.
Intermediate Precision: Intermediate Precision
expresses within- laboratories variations: different days,
different analysts, different equipment, etc

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

35/60

Nov 2014

2.8= t value x 2=2 x 1.4


Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

36/60

Limits of Detection
The Limit of Detection (LOD) of a method may
be defined as the concentration of analyte which
gives rise to a signal that is significantly
different from the control or blank.

The LOD is the lowest concentration of analyte


that can be distinguished from background
The results obtained at the Limit of Detection
are not necessarily Precise or Accurate

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

37/60

Limit of detection (LoD) is based on the standard


deviation of the response and the slope. The detection
limit (LoD) may be expressed as:

DL = 3.3 /S
Where = the standard deviation of the
response (peak height, peak area etc.)
S = the slope of the calibration curve
For this purpose the blank + 3S
approach is
adequate
Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

38/60

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

39/60

Limits of Quantitation

The limits of quantitation (LOQ) are the


lowest and the highest concentrations of
analyte in a sample or specimen that can be
measured with an acceptable level of
accuracy and precision.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

40/60

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

41/60

Limit of quantification (LoQ) based on the standard deviation of


the response and the slope. The quantitation limit (QL) may be
expressed as:
QL = 10 /S
Where = the standard deviation of the response (peak height,
peak area etc.)
S = the slope of the calibration curve
The slope S may be estimated from the calibration curve of the
analyte.
For this purpose the blank + 10 approach is applicable
= standard deviation of sample blank or fortified sample blank
value.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

42/60

LOD/LOQ/LINEARITY

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

43/60

ANOVA

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

44/60

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

45/60

40
35

VALIDATION ANOVA/F TEST

C2

30
25

10

15 18 20

20

12 15 2
0
22 27 3
0

2
2
3
2

2
8
3
4

15
10
0

15
20
25
30
C1
Pearson correlation of C1 and C2 = 0.977.GOOD
ORRELATION
ANNOVA F=5.86 against 3.44 from F table

Nov 2014

10

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

46/60

Linearity and Range


The linearity of a method is its ability to elicit results that are

directly, or by a well defined mathematical transformation,


proportional to the concentration of analyte in the sample.

The range of the method is the area between the lower and the

upper limits of quantitation that is also linear.

Within the range of the method, results are accurate, precise

and linear

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

47/60

Recovery expressed as a percentage :


R = {(CF-CU)/CA} x 100

CF = concentration of analyte measured in the fortified sample


CU = concentration of analyte measured in the un-fortified
sample

CA =

Nov 2014

concentration of analyte added in the fortified sample

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

48/60

Recovery

The failure to determine all of the analyte


present in a sample may reflect an inherent
problem in the method. This could be due to
either problems in detecting the analyte or
problems with extraction efficiency. The fraction
or percentage of an analyte added to a test
sample that can be recovered in the analysis
is called recovery (Eurachem, 1998).
Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

49/60

ROBUSTNESS
The robustness of an analytical procedure is a
measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by
small, but deliberate, variation in method parameters
and provides an indication of its reliability during
normal usage.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

50/60

Ruggedness
Ruggedness is the reproducibility of the

test results obtained for identical


samples under normal (but variable) test
conditions./The variance in the analysis of
homogenous samples between analysts and
Laboratories.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

51/60

Correlation Coefficient,r:
The quantityr, called thelinear correlation
coefficient, measures the strength and
the direction of a linear relationship between two
variables.The linear correlation coefficient is
sometimes referred to as thePearson product
moment correlation coefficientin
honor of its developer Karl Pearson.
The mathematicalformulafor computingris:

wherenis the number of pairs of data.


Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

52/60

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

53/60

The quantityr, called thelinear correlation

coefficient, measures the strength and the


direction of a linear relationship between two
variables.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

54/60

The mathematicalformulafor
computingris:

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

55/60

Correlation !!!
Positive correlation: Ifxandyhave a strong positive linear

correlation,ris close to +1. Anrvalue of exactly +1 indicates


a perfect positive fit.
Positive values

indicate a relationship betweenxandyvariables such that as values


forxincreases, values foryalso increase.
Negative correlation: Ifxandyhave a strong negative linear
correlation,ris close to -1. Anrvalue of exactly -1 indicates
a perfect negative fit.Negative values indicate a relationship
betweenxandysuch that as values forxincrease, values
forydecrease.
No correlation:If there is no linear correlation or a weak linear
correlation,ris close to 0.A value near zero means that there is
a random, nonlinear relationship between the two variables

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

56/60

Coefficient of Determination,r2 orR2:

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

57/60

Thecoefficient of determination,r2,is useful because it


gives the proportion of the variance (fluctuation) of one variable
that is predictable from the other variable.
It is a measure that allows us to determine how certain one can
be in making predictions from a certain model/graph.
Thecoefficient of determinationis the ratio of the
explained variation to the total variation .
Thecoefficient of determinationis such that 0<r2<1,
and denotes the strength of the linear association
betweenxandy.

Thecoefficient of determinationrepresents the percent


of the data that is the closestto the line of best fit.
Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

58/60

example,
ifr= 0.922, thenr2= 0.850, which means that
85% of the total variation inycan be explained by
the linear relationship betweenx andy(as
described by the regression equation). The other
15% of the total variation inyremains unexplained.

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

59/60

SLOPE of the line???

think the most useful form of straight-line equations is the "slope-

intercept" form:
y = mx + b
This is called the slope-intercept form because "m" is theslopeand "b"
gives they-intercept
SLOPE DETERMINES ????

Nov 2014

Dr.Mushtaq Ahmad

60/60

Anda mungkin juga menyukai