Presented by:
CA Prashant Kapoor
Mergers and Acquisitions - Tax
July 10, 2010
Contents
1
Background
Valuation Rules
Background
3
The above charging section is same as section 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Two conditions are required to be satisfied for any income to be chargeable under the head
income from other sources: - Income not included under any other head; and
- Income included in the total income of an assessee.
Any income chargeable under a specific head can be charged only under that head and no
part of that income can be charged again under section 56
4
Section 56(2)(vii)
5
Section 56(2)(vii)
Section 56(2)(vii) reads as under:
where an individual or a HUF receives, in any previous year, from any person or persons on or after the 1st day of October,
2009,
(a) any sum of money, without consideration, the aggregate value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees, the whole of the
aggregate value of such sum;
(b) any immovable property, without consideration, the stamp duty value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees, the stamp
duty value of such property;
(c) any property, other than immovable property,
(i) without consideration, the aggregate FMV of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees, the whole of the aggregate FMV
of such property;
(ii) for a consideration which is less than the aggregate FMV of the property by an amount exceeding fifty thousand
rupees, the aggregate FMV of such property as exceeds such consideration :
Provided that where the stamp duty value of immovable property as referred to in sub-clause (b) is disputed by the
assessee on grounds mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 50C, the Assessing Officer may refer the valuation of such
property to a Valuation Officer, and the provisions of section 50C and sub-section (15) of section 155 shall, as far as may
be, apply in relation to the stamp duty value of such property for the purpose of sub-clause (b) as they apply for valuation of
capital asset under those sections.
Section 56(2)(vii)
Provided further that this clause shall not apply to any sum of money or any property received
(a) from any relative; or (b) on the occasion of the marriage of the individual; or (c) under a will or by way of inheritance; or
(d) in contemplation of death of the payer or donor, as the case may be; or (e) from any local authority as defined in the
Explanation to clause (20) of section 10; or (f) from any fund or foundation or university or other educational institution or
hospital or other medical institution or any trust or institution referred to in clause (23C) of section 10; or (g) from any trust or
institution registered under section 12AA.
Section 56(2)(vii):
Memorandum explaining provisions
The Memorandum to Finance Bill, 2010 explains the rationale behind Section 56(2)(vii) as under:
The provisions of section 56(2)(vii) were introduced as a counter evasion mechanism to prevent laundering of unaccounted
income under the garb of gifts, particularly after abolition of the Gift Tax Act. The provisions were intended to extend the tax
net to such transactions in kind. The intent is not to tax the transactions entered into in the normal course of business or trade,
the profits of which are taxable under specific head of income. It is, therefore, proposed to amend the definition of property so
as to provide that section 56(2)(vii) will have application to the property which is in the nature of a capital asset of the
recipient and therefore would not apply to stock-in-trade, raw material and consumable stores of any business of such
recipient.
C. In several cases of immovable property transactions, there is a time gap between the booking of a property and the receipt
of such property on registration, which results in a taxable differential. It is, therefore, proposed to amend clause (vii) of
section 56(2) so as to provide that it would apply only if the immovable property is received without any consideration and to
remove the stipulation regarding transactions involving cases of inadequate consideration in respect of immovable property.
These amendments are proposed to take effect retrospectively from 1st October, 2009 and will, accordingly, apply in relation
to the assessment year 2010-11 and subsequent years.
From any fund or foundation or university or other educational institution or hospital or other medical
institution or any trust or institution referred to in section 10 (23C); or
From any trust or institution registered under section 12AA.
10
Section 56(2)(viia)
13
Section 56(2)(viia)
Section 56(2)(viia)1 reads as under:
Where a firm or a company not being a company in which the public are substantially interested,
receives, in any previous year, from any person or persons, on or after the 1st day of June, 2010,
any property, being shares of a company not being a company in which the public are substantially
interested,
(i) without consideration, the aggregate fair market value of which exceeds fifty
thousand rupees, the whole of the aggregate fair market value of such property;
(ii) for a consideration which is less than the aggregate fair market value of the property
by an amount exceeding fifty thousand rupees, the aggregate fair market value of
such property as exceeds such consideration:
Provided that this clause shall not apply to any such property received by way of a transaction not
regarded as transfer under clause (via) or clause (vic) or clause (vicb) or clause (vid) or clause (vii)
of section 47.
Explanation For the purposes of this clause, fair market value of a property, being shares of a
company not being a company in which the public are substantially interested, shall have the
meaning assigned to it in the Explanation to clause (vii);
1
14
Section 56(2)(viia):
Memorandum explaining provisions
The Memorandum to FB 2010 explains the rationale behind Section 56(2)(viia) as under:
Under the existing provisions of section 56(2)(vii), any sum of money or any property in kind which
is received without consideration or for inadequate consideration (in excess of the prescribed limit of
Rs. 50,000/-) by an individual or an HUF is chargeable to income tax in the hands of recipient under
the head income from other sources. However, receipts from relatives or on the occasion of
marriage or under a will are outside the scope of this provision
These are anti-abuse provisions which are currently applicable only if an individual or an HUF is the
recipient. Therefore, transfer of shares of a company to a firm or a company, instead of an individual
or an HUF, without consideration or at a price lower than the fair market value does not attract the
anti-abuse provision.
In order to prevent the practice of transferring unlisted shares at prices much below their fair market
value, it is proposed to amend section 56 to also include within its ambit transactions undertaken in
shares of a company (not being a company in which public are substantially interested) either for
inadequate consideration or without consideration where the recipient is a firm or a company (not
being a company in which public are substantially interested). Section 2(18) provides the definition
of a company in which the public are substantially interested.
It is also proposed to exclude the transactions undertaken for business reorganization,
amalgamation and demerger which are not regarded as transfer under clauses (via), (vic), (vicb),
(vid) and (vii) of section 47 of the Act.
15
16
The taxpayer was a company registered in USA and was holding shares of 3 Indian group companies in
addition to group companies across the globe;
The taxpayer had filed for bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy code of USA;
Per the reorganization plan submitted under the aforesaid proceedings, the taxpayer transferred its shares
of Indian group companies to its subsidiary entities in USA;
A separate holding company (DHC) was formed at the helm of the group to take over the assets and
liabilities of the taxpayer. Further, an independent private equity concern infused funds into DHC for
exchange of DHCs shares.
Issues
AARs
Ruling
Whether any profit or gain within the meaning of Section 45 of the Act, arose to the taxpayer on account of
transfer of shares in the Indian companies and whether the ingredient of full value of consideration as
contemplated in Section 48 of the Act was present ?
Whether TP laws are applicable to the aforesaid transaction?
The taxpayers liabilities assumed by DHC could not be legitimately treated as consideration nor could it be
adopted as a measure of consideration for the transfer of shares;
The AAR observed that the profit or gain envisaged by Section 45 of the Act should be a distinct component
of the transaction and should not be computed on a notional or hypothetical basis;
Relying on the ratio of the judgment in case of B. C. Srinivasa Setty, the AAR ruled that since in the present
case there was no consideration as prescribed in Section 48, there could be no capital gains chargeable to
tax under;
Section 92 of the Act is not a charging provision but a provision providing computational methodology;
If by application of Section 45 read with Section 48, the income could not be brought in the purview of tax
net in India, the TP provisions contained in Section 92 would not be applicable.
17
Issues Whether the applicant is liable to tax in India on the proposed contribution of shares of an Indian company?
Whether the proposed contribution of shares by the applicant to the Cyprus company attracts the transfer
pricing provisions of section 92 to 92F of the Act?
Whether the Cyprus company, is required to withhold tax as per the provisions of section 195 of the Act?
AARs
On liability to tax in India
Ruling
When the computation provision cannot be applied, the charging provision fails. The Supreme Court in the
case of B.C. Srinivasa Setty had explained the scope of both the above provisions.
The income in the sense of profit and gain should be real but not hypothetical income. Since applicant did not
derive any profit or gain in the form of money or money's worth or nothing capable of being turned into money
has accrued or arisen to the applicant on the date of transfer, the applicant was not liable to tax in India.
On the applicability of transfer pricing provisions
The AAR relied on the case of Dana Corporation and held that if income is not chargeable under section 45
read with section 48 of the Act the transfer pricing provisions under section 92 of the Act are not applicable.
On withholding tax
No liability to withhold tax under section 195 of the Act since income is not chargeable to tax.
18
19
Shares in a
closely held
Indian / Foreign
co.
Transferor /
Donor
Any person
(R / NR)
Receipt of shares
(physical or demat
/ equity or
preference)
Transferee /
Recipient
On or after 1
June 2010
Firm / Closely
held Co.
(R / NR)
20
Section
Nature of transaction
47(via)
47(vic)
Receipt of shares in an Indian Co. by resulting Foreign Co. from the demerged
Foreign Co. in a scheme of demerger
47(vicb)
47(vid)
Receipt of shares in the resulting Co. by the shareholders of the demerged Co.
under a scheme of demerger
47(vii)
These exclusions are not applicable if shares received by an Individual and HUF
21
Situation 2: Where there is inadequate consideration i.e. the consideration (say INR x) is less than
the aggregate FMV of the shares by an amount exceeding INR 50,000 Taxable income: Aggregate FMV of the shares exceeding the consideration (i.e. FMV minus x).
As per recent CBDT notification, FMV of unquoted shares to be determined as under Equity shares Book value computed in the specified manner
Other shares Price which such shares will fetch in the open market as supported by a
valuation report of a Merchant Banker or Chartered Accountant
22
26
27
Valuation Rules
28
i. the lowest price of such shares and securities on any recognized stock exchange
on the valuation date
ii. If shares and not traded on the valuation date then the lowest price of such
shares and securities on any recognized stock exchange on a date immediately
preceding the valuation date when such shares and securities were traded on such
stock exchange
Valuation date shall be the date on which the respective property is received by the assessee
29
FMV shall be estimated selling price which such shares would fetch if sold in the open market on the
valuation date. The taxpayer may obtain a report from a merchant banker or an accountant in respect
of such valuation.
Jewellery and Archaeological collection, Drawings, Paintings, Sculptures or any work of art
The FMV of above property received shall be estimated to be the price which such jewellery would fetch
if sold in the open market on the valuation date.
n case the above property is received by the way of purchase from a registered dealer on the valuation
date then the FMV shall be the invoice value of such property.
In case the above property is received by any other mode and its value exceeds Rs.50,000, then
assessee may obtain the report of registered valuer in respect of the price it would fetch if sold in the
open market on the valuation date.
31
Glossary of Terms
B/S:
Balance Sheet
CBDT :
COA :
Cost of Acquisition
Co. :
Company
DTAA:
Double Taxation Avoidance
Agreement
FB :
Finance Bill
FMV :
HUF :
INR :
LLP :
NR :
Non-Resident
R:
Resident
TP:
Transfer Pricing
32
33