PROPOSED WORK
To replace cement partially with ground
granulated blast furnace slag.
To study the properties of self compacting
concrete.
To develop mix design for self compacting
concrete
To study standards proposed by EFNARC
To study the possibilities of replacement of
cement with GGBS in self compacting
concrete.
ABSTRACT
PARAMETERS TO BE STUDIED
Segregation resistance of self compacting
concrete.
Flow ability, passing ability, stability of self
compacting concrete.
Strength development of self compacting
concrete over a period of 90 days i.e. at 7,
28 and 90days.
Influence of GGBS on strength
development at various percentages of
replacements.
LITERATURE REVIEW 1
Title of Paper, Name of Design of self compacting concrete with
Journal, Year of
ground granulated blast furnace slag,
Publication
science direct, 2012
Definition of problem
Objective
Parameters studied
Results and
discussion for major
parameter studied
Major Conclusion
LITERATURE REVIEW 2
Title of Paper, Name
of Journal, Year of
Publication
Definition of problem
Objective
Parameters studied
A simple mix design method for selfcompacting concrete, Research Gate, 2001
Results and
discussion for major
parameter studied
Major Conclusion
LITERATURE REVIEW 3
Title of Paper, Name
of Journal, Year of
Publication
Definition of
problem
Objective
Parameters studied
Major Conclusion
LITERATURE REVIEW 4
Influence of Mixture Composition and Type
of
Title of Paper, Name of Cementitious Materials on Enhancing the
Journal, Year of
Fresh Properties
Publication
and Stability of Self-Consolidating
Rubberized Concrete, American society of
civil engineers, 2016
Definition of problem
Objective
Parameters studied
Results and
discussion for major
parameter studied
Major Conclusion
LITERATURE REVIEW 5
Behaviour of fatigue loaded selfTitle of Paper, Name of compacting concrete compared to
Journal, Year of
vibrated concrete, structural concrete
Publication
journal, 2014
Definition of problem
Objective
Parameters studied
Results and
discussion for major
parameter studied
Major Conclusion
CRITICAL REVIEW
No proper design method is developed over
the years that comply with Indian standards.
Lack of dedicated code provisions and
standardized tests for testing the SCC.
Less research has been done till now on
varying percentages of GGBS in SCC.
GGBS is better choice than other mineral
admixtures in terms of pozzolonic activity.
Partial replacements of cement with GGBS
have higher scope in near future especially in
high strength concretes.
METHODOLOGY
RESOURCES REQUIRED
Ground Granulated Blast furnace slag
Cement, fine aggregates and coarse
aggregates.
Metakaolin
Viscosity modifying agent
Water reducers
POSSIBLE OUTCOMES
Design mix complying with EFNARC
standards.
Slow strength gaining of SCC with
GGBS at early stages.
Expected strengths of self
compacting concrete when cement
is partially replaced with GGBS.
Increase in strengths of SCC with
GGBS at particular percentage of
replacements.
Time schedule
Type of work
Duration of work
schedule
Literature review
Two months
Mid-July To MidSeptember
Mix design
calculations
1-2 weeks
Mid-September To end
of September
One month
October
Casting of cubes
Two months
November-December
Testing of cubes
Three months
December-Mid-March
Analysis of results
One week
End of March
One-Two months
April -May
CONCLUSIONS
Strength of Self compacting concrete with
partial replacement of cement with GGBS
at 7, 28 and 90 days will increase at a
notable rate.
Rate of strength gaining of SCC with
GGBS at different replacement levels.
Suitability of mix design method, that can
be used, for different grades of concrete.
Effect of GGBS and Metakaolin on
propeties of cement can be concluded.
REFERENCES
http://www.sciencedirect.com/
https://www.researchgate.net/
https://www.knimbus.com/user/show
MainPage.do