PERFORMANCE
MANANGEMENT
PRESENTED BY:
NAMAN NANDA
SRIKANT SHARMA
IMPORTANCE OF PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION
Performance Feedback
Employee Training & Development Decisions
Promotions & Transfers
Layoff Decisions
Human Resource Planning
METHODS OF PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION
TRADITIONAL METHODS
MODERN METHODS
Graphic Scale
360 Degree
720 Degree
Management by Objectives
(I)
POOR
(II)
FAIRLY
POOR
(III)
FAIRLY
GOOD
(IV)
GOOD
(V)
EXCELLENT
QUALITY OF
WORK
QUANTITY OF
WORK
TEAMWORK
Most common & widely used method
The system can be done with numbers or letters, and it usually consists of a
range, running from poor to excellent.
The business can tailor the rating scale to reflect the skills necessary to perform
the duties of the jobs in the organization.
For example: the appraisal for a human resource worker may add more weight to
the rating for communication skills while an assembly workers review may focus
more on technical skills.
MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES
This is another simplistic evaluation system and is a
clear cut way to track progress. In an objective-based
evaluation, an employer and employee will agree
upon a specific goal for the employee to meet
coupled with a deadline. If the employee meets the
objective, then it speaks highly of them and vice
versa.
Workers and managers work together to create a list
of objectives for the worker to attain during the
review period.
The objectives must be specific, measurable,
attainable, realistic and time based to meet the
management by objectives criteria for goals and
objectives.
Define
Organisati
onal Goals
Define
Employe
e
Objectiv
es
Performa
nce
Appraisal
Providin
g
Feedbac
k
Performa
nce
Evaluatio
n
Regular
Performa
nce
Monitorin
g
360-DEGREE METHOD