+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Yes, I know an infinitesimal is already really really tiny, so the reallys and tinys in really really tiny infinitesimals are redundant.
r
E =
1 q $
r
2
4 0 r
unit vector from
q to wherever
you want to
calculate E
r
E=
r
Ei =
i
1
4 0
q i $
i r 2 r i
i
dx
x
dx
If charge is distributed along a straight line segment
parallel to the x-axis, the amount of charge dq on a
segment of length dx is dx.
r'$
dE
r
x
dq
r
dE =
1 dq $
1 dx $
r' =
r'
2
2
4 0 r'
4 0 r'
E
P
r'$
r
x
dq
The electric field at P due to the entire line of charge is
r
E=
1(x)$dx
r'
4 0
r'2
The integration is carried out over the entire length of the line,
which need not be straight. Also, could be a function of position,
and can be taken outside the integral only if the charge
distribution is uniform.
x
d
Q
=
and Q = L
L
y
dE
P
d
dQ = dx
dx
The electric field points away from the rod. The electric
field on the axis of the rod has no y-component (why?).
dE from the charge on an infinitesimal length dx of rod
is
This is a legal
starting equation (for
positive dq). In fact,
this is the best way
to start a problem like
this one.
dq
dx
dE = k 2 k 2
x
x
y
dE
P
d
dQ = dx
dx
dL
r d+L r
d+L dx
d+L dx
1
i
E = dE = -k
i
=
-k
i
=
-k
d x 2
d
d
x2
x
d
This approach, where I do the whole problem all at once using unit vector notation, is not recommended for
beginners. I suggest you do the x and y components separately, like I will do in lecture.
r
d d L
1
1
L
kQ
E = -k
i = -k
i=
-k
i=
i
d d L
d d L
d L d
d d L
use dE = k
dq
r2
charge dq = dS
area = dS
Im assuming positively charged objects in
these distribution of charges illustrations.
y
Im assuming positively charged objects in
these distribution of charges illustrations.
r'$
dE
r
x
r
dE =
1 dq $
1 dS $
r' =
r'
2
2
4 0 r'
4 0 r'
r'$
r
x
r
E=
1
(x, y) dS
$
r'
4 0 S
r'2
dq
use dE = k r 2
r'$
r
x
r
E=
1
(x, y, z) dV
$
r'
.
2
4 0 V
r'
dq
use dE = k r 2
and work with one
component at a time
Summarizing:
r
E=
1 dx$
r' 2 .
4 0
r'
r
E=
1
dS
$
r' 2 .
4 0 S r'
r
E=
1
dV
$
r' 2 .
4 0 V r'
r
E=
1 dx$
r' 2
4 0
r'
r
E=
1
dS
$
r' 2
4 0 S r'
r
E=
1
dV
$
r' 2
4 0 V r'
dq
r2
use dE = k
dq
r2
This is a legal
variation of a starting
equation!
Quiz time
x0
dE
x0
dQ2
dE2
dE1
The y-components
cancel pairwise. Same
for z-components (not
shown).
dQ
dQ
dE=k 2
r
x0
dE
r = x a
2
0
x0
cos
r
No absolute
value signs
because Q is
positive.
dQ
dE x =k 2 cos
r
x0
dQ x 0
E x dE x k 2
k 3
r r
r
ring
ring
direction.
x0
kx 0 Q
ring dQ k r 3 Q x 2 a 2 3/ 2
E
Ex,ring
Or, in general, on the ring axis
ring
This is another legal
answer.
k kxQ
xQ
22
x
x
aa
..
3/ 2
2 2 3/2
Direction of E
is away from
center of ring.
dE ring dE x, ring
kx 0 2rdr
2
0
r2
.
3/2
Caution! Ive
switched the
meaning of
r!
dQ
r
P
x0
Ex
dE
disc
disc
x r
E x kx 0
2
0
kx 0 2rdr
2
0
2 1/ 2
1/ 2
2 3/ 2
kx 0
2r dr
2
0
2 3/ 2
x
x
0
2k 0
x 0 x 2 R 2 1/ 2
0
1
Let R and usek
40
E sheet
to get
x
x
0
0
E x 2k
1/2
x0 x2 R 2
0
.
2 0
E
2 0 r
Not a
starting
equation!
d tan sec 2 d
1
sec
cos
*1.52 is not
assigned this
R
R
R
R
By symmetry, Ex=0
(why?).
d sin()
dE y = -dE sin() -k
R
dE
There is dq of charge
on the ds of the line.
That dq of charge
gives rise to dE of
field.
d sin() k
2k
E y = - dE y = - k
= - sin() d= 0
R
R 0
R