EXAMINATION
Examiner :
dr. Gatot Suharto, S. H, Sp. F, M. Kes
Mentor :
dr. Stephanus Rumancay, MH
Presented by :
Andreas Wongso
Astrid Odilia
Josephine Talitha G. Y. L.
Lau Pon Ying
Nur Asmalina Binti Azizam
Sundus Kamal
Hair as Evidence
Hairs biological
information easy
and cost-effective
examine
Hair strong
investigative and
adjudicative
information IF ONLY
examined
properly,reported
conservatively,testified
Asia
Kaukasi
a
Negro
Structure of Hair
Microanatomy
Microanatomy Structure
of the Hair
How to Differentiated
Human Hair and Non
Animal
hair and human hair have
Human Hair
(Animal)
several differences, inculiding :
The pattern
Pigmentation
The medullary index
And the cuticle type
How to Differentiated
Human Hair and Non
Human Hair (Animal) ?
Diameter
Shaft
Tip
Head
Even
Straight or curly;
some waviness;
may be very long
Usually cut
Pubic
Varies
Sometimes
extreme waviness
or curl
Usually
pointed; may
be razor cut
Facial
Wide; even
Some shouldering
Usually cut;
may be
scissors or
razor cut
Diameter
Shaft
Tip
Chest
Even to some
variation
Wavy to curly;
some more
straight
Usually
pointed
Axillary
Even; some
variation
Less wavy/curly
than chest
Usually
pointed; may
be colorless
Limb
Fine; tapering
Slight arc
Usually
pointed
Eyebrow/
eyelash
Tapering
Arc; short
Pointed
Pubic hair
Head hair
Ancestral Estimation
Human Hairs
MIXED
RACE
Diameter CrossSection
Pigment
Distribut
ion
Cuticle
Undulati
on
African
60-90 m
Flat
Dense;
Clumped
Thin
Prevalent
European
70-100
m
Oval
Even
Medium
Uncommo
n
Asian
90-120
m
Round
Dense to
very
dense
Thick
Never
African
European
Asian
Razor cut
Glass cut
Scissor cut
Burned cut
Hair Examination
The hairs are examined from root to tip, at
magnification of 40x to 250x
Hairs are mounted on glass microscope slides
with a mountingmedium of an appropriate
refractive index for hairs, about 1.5
The questioned hairs are then described
individually
These descriptions cover the root, the
microanatomy of the shaft and the tip
Interpretation
First, if the questioned hair exhibits the same
microscopic characteristics as the known hair
sample, then it could have come from the
same person who provided the known sample
Second, if the questioned hair exhibits
similarities but slight differences to the known
hair sample, then no conclusion can be drawn
as to whether the questioned hair could have
come from the known source
Microscopynot a
screening test
mtDNA
analysisnot a
confirmatory
test
Both methods or
eitherimportant
information
Evidence tested:
purified DNA
PCR Amplification
& sequencing
SUMMARY
Hairs are potentially useful types
of
evidence
Microscopical comparisons can
provide information by including or
excluding individuals from
consideration
Mitochondrial DNA enhances this
information by adding genetic
information.