(2)We argue that if member of TMT come from various social group
it enables them to collect a broader set of information that can be
used in decision making, it also results in higher levels of
motivation and commitment because of employees identification
with (a member of) the management team.
(3)We show that it is useful to distinguish between job related
heterogeneity and non-job related forms of heterogeneity.
Limitation
As it is cross sectional survey it might suffer from
biases that pose a threat to the validity of the
findings but researcher followed guidelines of
Dillman(2009) to reduce that.
A potential bias is that this study focused on single
industry though we believe this sector well suited to
test hypothesis.Testing in other sector could add
more validity of the results.
It is not possible to rule out the existence of other
cause-effect relationships than the one we did.
This study focused on limited model,full model can
explore more
Scope of Study
Future studies may attempt to capture TMT
heterogeneity with psychological constructs.
Strategic change may be measured with
objective data that provide proxies for the
organizations strategic position at different
points in time.
Future research can be done on intra-team
decision making processes and group dynamics
as well as of the more symbolic effects of TMT
heterogeneity on other members of the
organization.