Supervision and

Evaluation Analysis
Kolbie Haines

Evaluations
Traditional Evaluation Form- Southern Illinios University Coaches
Evaluation Form- See Slide
Current Evaluation Form- OTES- OTES
Future Evaluation- Ohio Evaluations for Professional Staff (Principals) OPES

Coaches Evaluation System

Pros
- Record accounts for a piece of your
evaluation
- Evaluation takes into account all that
the coach is involved in at the
university, not just their regular
coaching duties
- Takes into account student-athlete
success in the classroom

Cons
- Subjective grading system
- Record accounts for a piece of your
evaluation
- Takes into account student-athlete
success in the classroom

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Pros and Cons to OTES

Pros
- Tries to focus on teachers growth
- Objective based rubric
- As teacher improve to
Accomplished they have more
freedoms within the system

Cons
- Focuses too much on student
performance (Test Scores)
- Student performance is 50% of a
teachers score which causes
teachers to teach to the test

Ohio Principal Evaluation System

Pros and Cons of OPES

Pros
- Evaluation of principals proficiency
on the standards (50%)
- Proficiency on the standards includes
professional goalsetting,
communication and professionalism,
and skills and knowledge.
- Similar process to OTES
- Can act as a portfolio builder

Cons
- Student growth measures (50%)
- It is a one size fits all (pre-K- 12)
evaluation system

Review
After interviewing my principal, I feel the best way to get evaluated out of these
three is the OPES. My principal made some interesting points. He told me how the
system works for him. He mentioned it acts as a portfolio for him. He can upload
PD, data and community engagement pieces (such as parents emails and events)
to his evaluation. His evaluator can see it and it acts almost as brownie points. I
think this is a great idea because its not only helping the evaluator see the
principal's involvement as a whole and not only as a snapshot. I feel the current
evaluation system I am in (OTES) is similar to OPES but I feel it lack the portfolio
side. Although there is nothing wrong with the coaches evaluation system, it is not
objective enough to hold in the public school setting and tries to address coaching
as a whole but is to vauge.