Roteiro
2
Introduo
Tecnologias de Web Semntica
Abordagens de Representao de DR baseadas em
Web Semntica
Discusso
Concluso
Referncias
Introduo
3
Introduo
4
Introduo
5
RDF
7
RDF
8
Links
OWL
9
OWL
Classes + hierarquia
Propriedades (objetos/tipos de dados)
Relaes entre classes (herana, equivalncia, ...)
Restries de propriedades
Caractersticas de propriedades (inversa, funcional inversa)
Anotaes
Indivduos
Tarefas de Raciocnio: classificao, verificao de consistncia
OWL
10
Classes
Indivduos
Propriedades
Propriedades de Objeto
SWRL
11
Abordagens
12
Rockwell et al.
13
14
Rockwell et al.
Ontologia DSO
Zhang et al.
15
16
Zhang et al.
Ontologia ISAA
De Medeiros e Schwabe
17
18
De Medeiros e
Schwabe
Ontologia Kuaba
Gueraich
19
20
Gueraich
Anotaes semnticas
21
Gueraich
Ontologia
Tappolet et al.
22
Akerman e Tyree
23
24
Akerman e
Tyree
Viso de Alto Nvel da
Ontologia
25
Akerman e
Tyree
Segmento de Decises
de Arquitetura da
Ontologia
Lpez et al.
26
Props a ontologia NDR (Non-functional requirements and Design Rationale)
27
Lpez et al.
Classes e Propriedades
da Ontologia NDR
Discusso
28
Discusso
29
Discusso
30
Concluso
31
Referncias
32
[1]
J. Lee, Design rationale systems: understanding the issues, IEEE Expert, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 7885, May
1997.
[2] Y. Zhang, X. Luo, J. Li, and J. J. Buis, A semantic representation model for design rationale of
products, Adv. Eng. Inform., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1326, Jan. 2013.
[3] W. C. Regli, X. Hu, M. Atwood, and W. Sun, A Survey of Design Rationale Systems: Approaches,
Representation, Capture and Retrieval, Eng. Comput., vol. 16, no. 34, pp. 209235, Dec. 2000.
[4] T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila, The semantic web, Sci. Am., vol. 284, no. 5, pp. 2837,
2001.
[5] P. Hitzler, M. Krtzsch, B. Parsia, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and S. Rudolph, OWL 2 web ontology language
primer, W3C Recomm., vol. 27, no. 1, p. 123, 2009.
[6] D. L. McGuinness and F. Van Harmelen, OWL web ontology language overview, W3C Recomm., vol.
10, no. 10, p. 2004, 2004.
[7]
G. Klyne and J. J. Carroll, Resource description framework (RDF): Concepts and abstract syntax. W3C
Recommendation, 2004, World Wide Web Consort. Httpw3c OrgTRrdf-Concepts, 2004.
[8] D. Brickley, R. V. Guha, and B. McBride, RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF Schema. W3C
Recommendation (2004), URL Httpwww W3 Orgtr2004rec-Rdf-Schema-20040210, 2004.
[9] I. Horrocks, P. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean, SWRL: A Semantic Web
Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, W3C Recommendation, 2004.
[10] J. A. Rockwell, I. R. Grosse, S. Krishnamurty, and J. C. Wileden, A Semantic Information Model for
Capturing and Communicating Design Decisions, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 031008, 2010.
Referncias
33
[11]
A. P. de Medeiros and D. Schwabe, Kuaba approach: Integrating formal semantics and design rationale
representation to support design reuse, Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., vol. 22, no. 04, Nov. 2008.
[12] M. Kifer and G. Lausen, F-logic: a higher-order language for reasoning about objects, inheritance, and
scheme, presented at the ACM SIGMOD Record, 1989, vol. 18, pp. 134146.
[13] T. R. Nunes, A. P. de Medeiros, and R. Rio das Ostras, KSEferramenta de apoio captura e
representao semi-automtica de design rationale em Engenharia de Software, Sess. Ferram. 2009, p. 31.
[14] S. Gueraich, Building a Project Memory Using Semantic Design Rationale Process, J. Softw. Eng.
Appl., vol. 04, no. 06, pp. 356370, 2011.
[15] E. Oren, K. Mller, S. Scerri, S. Handschuh, and M. Sintek, What are semantic annotations, Relatrio
Tc. DERI Galway, 2006.
[16] J. Tappolet, C. Kiefer, and A. Bernstein, Semantic web enabled software analysis, Web Semant. Sci.
Serv. Agents World Wide Web, vol. 8, no. 23, pp. 225240, Jul. 2010.
[17] A. Akerman and J. Tyree, Using ontology to support development of software architectures, IBM Syst.
J., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 813825, 2006.
[18] T. Bray, J. Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, E. Maler, and F. Yergeau, Extensible Markup Language
(XML) 1.0, W3C Recommendation. 2000, Role Citiz. Cards E-Gov., vol. 455, 2000.
[19] C. Lpez, P. Inostroza, L. M. Cysneiros, and H. Astudillo, Visualization and comparison of architecture
rationale with semantic web technologies, J. Syst. Softw., vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 11981210, Aug. 2009.
[20] L. Chung, B. Nixon, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos, Non-functional requirements, Softw. Eng., 2000.