content on properties of
dense polymer membranes
M. Kohoutov
Due
The only problem is long time stability of the liquid in the pores.
200
60
5
0.9
IL
C14H24N+BF4- C4mim+PF6- C8H26N2+B(CN)4- C27H54F6N2O4S2
0.1
0.5
1.2
1.3
2.4
1.9
3.5
0.15
Experimental
Membranes preparation :
PDMS Elastosil M4601 (base & crosslinking
catalyst) (Wacker Silicones, Germany)
IL benzyl-3-butylimidazolium
tetrafluoroborate (Chemada Fine Chemicals,
Israel)
10, 20, 30 wt. % of IL
Average thickness 0.3 0.017 mm
Conditions :
37C, 5 wt.% butan-1-ol, N2 flow rate 0.9 ml/s,
48 hours
Analysis : Finnigan GC Trace Ultra GC TCD;
Dependence of preferential and total sorption i , Q respectively of butan-1-ol from 5 wt.% butan-1
ol aqueous solution on [BBIM][BF4] content in PDMS membrane (sorption from liquid solution)
Pervaporation set-up
Retentate
Thermostat
Feed
Permeate
Reaction vessel
Vacuum
pump
Cold trap
Permeate
Pervaporation
experiment
standard laboratory
pervaporation set-up
with effective
membrane area of
5 cm2 ; downstream
pressure
p = 60 Pa
Experimental
As a support matrix for the polymer-IL membrane the ceramic
ultrafiltration module made from TiO2 with pore size 60 nm was
used.
The PDMS was prepared by mixing a solution of RTV 615A and
RTV 615B (General Electric) in 10:1 ratio at 60C for 0.5 hour.
15 wt% of tetrapropylammonium tetracyano-borate ionic liquid and
85 wt% polydimethylsiloxane (IL1).
50 wt% of 1-ethenyl-3-ethyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphate ionic
liquid was mixed with 50 wt% polydimethylsiloxane - (IL2).
The enrichment factor of butan-1-ol increased from 2.2 (PDMS) up to 10.9 (IL2-PDMS) (Izk P, Ruth W, Dyson P, Kragl U (2007) Selective
Removal of Acetone and Butan-1-ol from Water with Supported Ionic Liquid - Polydimethylsiloxane Membrane by Pervaporation, Chem. Eng. J., 139/2 (2008) 318-321 )
Fermentation was carried out at 37C and pH 4.5.
Firstly, a continuous fermentation with removal of ABE by pervaporation was measured without any butan-1-ol addition to
test, if the SILM was selective and stable.
Experiment
C. Acetobutylicum ATCC 824 was grown under
anaerobic phosphate-limited conditions.
In the chosen fermentation system, especially the
phosphate concentrations as well as the dilution rates
were responsible for the amount of produced solvents.
dilution rate
-1
(h )
0.05
0.075
0.075
0.09
phosphate
(mM)
0.75
0.75
0.5
0.75
OD600
7.12
7.1
8.52
6.25
acetone
-1
(g l )
3.82
2.82
5.00
3.18
butan-1-ol
-1
(g l )
7.12
5.44
10.38
7.07
acetate
-1
(g l )
0.97
0.98
1.62
0.93
butyrate
-1
(g l )
0.64
0.65
0.44
0.69
ethanol
-1
(g l )
0.67
0.50
0.94
0.77
solvent
productivity
-1 -1
(g l h )
0.66
0.78
1.38
1.14
Retentate
Feed
3
Permeate
Vac
Butan-1-ol concentration;
Optical density
Pervaporation off
After successful tests, the concentration of butan1-ol was several times increased to test the SILM
under more stringent conditions and to study the
effect of pervaporation on the cells.
After 3 months of the experiment we did not
observe any change of mass or selectivity of IL in
the pores of the ultrafiltration membrane.
Butan-1-ol; Acetone
Butan-1-ol; Acetone
Conclusions
To get more effective ABE removal from
fermentor we used pervaporation with IL-PDMS
nonporous membrane.
Using this membrane we were able to remove
ABE from the culture supernatant more effectively
than it was described by others (Qureshi et al.
(1992), Soni et al. (1987), Liu et al. (2004)).
Conclusions
The supported ionic liquid membranes were weighted
after all experiments and no weight changes were
observed stable SILM.
Higher diffusion coefficient is most probably
responsible for higher permeation flux and
enrichment factors of butan-1-ol in IL-PDMS
membrane.
If we would run pervaporation with continuous and
complete removal of butan-1-ol from the culture
supernatant, it would lead to more stable
fermentation process with higher production of
BIObutanol.
Acknowledgement