Anda di halaman 1dari 30

Welcome To

For
Presentation on

Preparation of Detailed Project Report for


CONSTRUCTION OF 2 LANING WITH PAVE SHOULDER OF
NH-302 IN MIZORAM (FROM LUNGLEI TO TLABUNG)

GOVERNMENT OF MIZORAM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Location Map
Background
The existing Lunglei - Tlabung Road was originally constructed
as ODR Standard road during the early part of seventies. It was
constructed by the BRO .

The road was constructed to provide connectivity between


district headquarters Lunglei and International boarder of Indo
BanglaDesh for international trading but also for Western part of
Mizoram.

The road was upgraded to the status of State road and


International trading route between India and Bangladesh in the
year 2005 & Sept 2014 upgraded to the status of National
Highway

Existing road take off from Km 4.5 of NH 54 A at Lunglawn and


passes through the villages i.e.Lunglei, Hauruang, Pachang,
Phairuang, Chhumkhum, Lungsen, Sihphir, Tuichawng ,Tlabung
and terminate at near PWD IB (km 90.30) and Junction with
World bank funded Tlabung - Kawrpuichhuah road Indo
Bangladesh Border
Key Plan

Start of Project

End of Project Length of Existing Road 90.3 Km


NESSESITY AND OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT
i) Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, intend for widening
to 2-lane, re-alignment and geometric improvement of
Lunglei - Tlabung (Demagiri ) Road from Km 0.00 to Km 90.3
of existing chainage in the state of Mizoram under SARDP
NE Phase -B.

ii) This will facilitate for safer quicker means of traffic between
district headquarters and International border of Indo
BanglaDesh for international trading .
iii) Re-alignment of existing road
To avoid Built Up Areas and seamless Traffic flow without
interference from city traffic.
To reduce Congestion in the built-up Area of Lunglawn (a
locality of Lunglei town) and Tlabung Town.
To enhance Road Safety inside the Built up Areas.
Costly Land Acquisition and serious resettlement problems
in the existing road.
Scope of work
Widening alongwith geometric improvement of existing road to two-Lane standard having 7 m wide
paved carriageway with paved shoulders

Realignment at the existing road from Km 42/445 to Km 44/680 , Km 52/600 to Km 55/140 and Km
70/175 to Km 73/200

Construction of 484 culverts in which 436 nos of HP culverts & 48 nos of Box culverts

New Construction of pavement on full stretch as flexible pavement (CTB+WMM+DBM+BC)

Construction bridges at Phairuang River -100 m, Chhawchhi River -80m , Tuichawng River-135m and
Thawrikau River-30m.

Construction of Retaining wall in 7260Rm, Breast wall in 3325 Rm, Gabion wall in 6060 Rm,
Mechanical stabilized wall in 750 Rm, Cut Slope wall in 10000 Rm and Toe wall in 3300 Rm.

Sub Surface Drains with Perforated Pipe 13000 Rm

Provisions of road marking, traffic sign boards, roadside furniture, road safety works, crash barrier,
delineators, boundary/ hectometer/kilometer, pedestrian facilities, Hydro seeding & plantation on hill
slopes etc. have been proposed in the scope of work.
Proposed Alignment on Toposheet
Land use

1. Land required for 2 Lane road - 192.0 Ha


2. Available ROW is used in proposed alignment - 45.20 Ha
3. Required area for proposed alignment (i/c FL) - 146.8 Ha
4. Forest land - 12.96 Ha
(R.Phairuang Reverine Reserved Forest -6.48 Ha from Km 29.7 to Km 35.1
R.Tuichawng Reverine Reserved Forest -4.08 Ha from Km 60.3 to Km 63.7
Khawthlang Tuipui Riverine Reserved - 2.40 Ha from Km 74.0 to Km 75.4)

About 93.25% length of the road passes through land owned/developed by


individuals land holders under periodic patta and village council pass and
About 6.75% passes through riverine forest area at Phairuang RRF ,
Tuichawng RRF , Khawthlang RRF & Reverse forest
Alignment Options
Sr. Alignment Option- Alignment Option-2 Remarks
No 1
.
1 Existing road take-off point Proposed road take-off point at Short relocation and regarding , heavily built-up areas which
at 4.5 Km on NH 54 A at 4.5 Km on NH 54 A at Theiriat
involve costly of Land Acquisition and serious resettlement
Theiriat to Km 12.00 to Km 12.00
problems in the existing road
Electric sub-station is the bottle neck for this project. Land
acquisition, shifting of substation is not possible.
Three nos. of high tension tower needed to be shifting.
2 From Km 12.00 to Km 13.50 From Km 12.00 to Km 13.50 Road passing through Hauruang village which involve costly
followed up the existing follow the existing alignment at
of Land Acquisition and serious resettlement problems in the
alignment
existing road.
Proposed road passing through ridge line.
3 From Km 13.50 to Km 37.71 From Km 13.50 to Km 37.71 Short relocation and regarding
followed up the existing followed up the existing
Road passing through Pachang & Phairuang village which
alignment alignment
involve costly of Land Acquisition and serious resettlement
problems in the existing road.
4 Km 37.71 to Km 38.25 Km 37.71 to Km 38.25 Road passing through Chhumkhum village is avoided,
followed up the existing Proposed realignment to bye
thereby economizing the cost of the land acquisition.
alignment pass the Chhumkhum Village
sharp Zigs on the existing road have been avoided
Alignment Options

Sr. Alignment Option- Alignment Option-2 Remarks


No 1
.
5 From Km 38.25 to Km 45.35 From Km 38.25 to Km 45.35 Short relocation and regarding
followed up the existing followed up the existing
alignment alignment
6 From Km 45.35 to Km 47.64 From Km 45.35 to Km 47.64 Road passing through Lungsen village is avoided, thereby
followed up the existing Proposed realignment to bye
economizing the cost of the land acquisition.
alignment pass the Lungsen village
Sharp Zigs on the existing road have been avoided
7 From Km 47.64 to Km 60.27 From Km 47.64 to Km 60.27 Short relocation and regarding
followed up the existing followed up the existing
alignment alignment
8 From Km 60.27 to Km 61.48 From Km 60.27 to Km 61.48 Road passing through Tuichawng Village is avoided,
followed up the existing Proposed realignment to bye
thereby economizing the cost of the land acquisition.
alignment pass the Tuichawng Village
Sharp Zigs on the existing road have been avoided
9 From Km 61.48 to Km From Km 61.48 to Km 75.40 Short relocation and regarding
75.30 followed up the followed up the existing
existing alignment. alignment

ecommended Alignment Option is option no -2


Villages along Project Road
Design Chainage Existing Chainage
Sr.
No Name of Village
From To From To
.
1 LUNGLEI TOWN 0 900 0 1080
2 HAURUANG VILLAGE 11360 13350 12780 14850
3 PACHANG VILLAGE 22500 24000 25130 26830
4 PHAIRUANG VILLAGE 31630 32500 35680 36610
5 CHHUMKHUM VILLAGE 37670 38400 42520 44830
6 LUNGSEN VILLAGE 45200 47640 52445 55140
7 SIHPHIR VILLAGE 51800 52040 60300 60570
8 TUICHWANG VILLAGE 60270 61480 70170 73190
Diversion
9 TLABUNGofTOWN
existing road 70770 75400 85180 90300
Length
Design Chainage Existing Chainage
Sr. in Km
Name of Village
No.
From To From To
1 Chhumkhum 37710 38250 42445 44680 0.540
2 Lungsen 45350 47640 52600 55140 2.290
3 Tuichwang 60270 61480 70175 73200 1.210
Total 4.040
Existing alignment : 71.36 Km
Re-alignment : 4.04 Km
Total length of proposed road : 75.40 Km
Proposed Diversion -1 for Km 5+715 to Km 5+875
Proposed Diversion - 2 for Km 37+710 to Km 38+250 at Chhumkhum
village
Proposed Diversion - 3 for Km45+350 to Km 47+640 Lungsen
village
Proposed Diversion - 4 for Km 60+270 to 61+480 Tuichawng Village
PARAMETERS OF TRAFFIC FLOW
Location Average daily Average daily peak hour peak hour Time of
traffic traffic traffic traffic ratio peak traffic
intensity intensity Nos/PCU in %
(PCU) (CVD)
Sazaikaw 1561 361 246/331 6.97 09-10
n
Tlabung 1501 349 247/334 8.15 10-11
Pukpui 1618 403 251/361 8.00 08-09
Average 1560 371 248/342 7.707
There are large numbers of Car/Jeep/Van/Taxi using the road (45.62%).
Traffic is dominated by the passenger vehicles (cars and two wheelers).
The heavy vehicle traffic is low as compared to the passenger traffic.
PAVEMENT DESIGN

The pavement is designed for


(a) 20 MSA (as per IRC:SP 73 -2015)
(b) 6% CBR (as per IRC:37:2012).

The proposed crust composition is as follows


Layer Thickness (mm)
BC 40
DBM 90
WMM in 2 Layers 250
CTB in 2 Layers 260
Total 640
PROPOSED ROAD GEOMETRIC
Horizontal alignments of the proposed road summarized as shown in table below:
Project No. of curves with design No. of curves with
road speed in km/h radius (m)
length <30 30-40 40-50 >50 <30 30-50 >50

The75.40 km
vertical 290 of the
alignments 503 62road summarized
proposed 16 2as shown
573in table
296
below:

Project Length Distribution (km) and Gradient Class


road <4% 4%-5% 5%-6% 6%-7% 7%-8%
length

75.40 km 36.89 Km 12.44 Km 14.04 Km 12.03 Km 0.00 Km

The maximum gradient being 6.46% at few selected stretch


BRIDGES ON THE PROPOSED ROAD

Sr. Location Superstructure Foundation


Name Span Arrangement
No. in Km Types Types
Phairuang River
1 31.860 1X 25+1X50+1X25 PSC I-girder Pile foundation
Bridge

Open foundation
PSCI-girder for 50m
Chhawchhi River for abutment &
2 33.470 1X15+1X50+1X15 span & RCC T-
Bridge Pile foundation for
beam for 15 m span
pier

Tuichawng River
3 61.380 3X45 PSC I-girder Pile foundation
Bridge
Thawrikau River
4 64.295 1X30 PSC I-girder Open foundation
Bridge
ABSTRACT OF COST ESTIMATE
Sr.No. Items of work Unit Amount (Rs)
1 Earthwork Rs. 2,566,045,261.09
2 Side Drain Rs. 232,760,370.08
3 Pavement works Rs. 4,707,504,147.10
4 Protection works Rs. 963,978,982.90
5 Cross Drainage works Rs. 697,835,046.63
6 Bridge works Rs. 559,133,333.88
7 Km Stone, Road Sign , Safety measures & Road Amenity Rs. 187,185,538.31
8 Diversion of existing Road Rs. 341,190,554.00
A Civil Cost Rs. 10,255,633,233.99
B Contingency (2.8% of A) Rs. 287,157,730.55
C TOTAL (A+B) Rs. 10,542,790,964.54
D Construction Supervision Charge (3 % of C) Rs. 316,283,728.94
E Quality Control Charge (0.25% of C) Rs. 26,356,977.41
F Road Safety Audit Charge (0.25% of C) Rs. 26,356,977.41
G Maintenance for 4Years (0.5%+1.5%x3=5% of A) Rs. 512,781,661.70
H Escalation (15% of A) Rs. 1,538,344,985.10
I Agency Charge (3 % of C) Rs. 316,283,728.94
J Cost of compensation for Land Acquisition (Approx) Rs. 750,000,000.00
K Cost of Utility Shifting Rs. 31,000,000.00
L Cost of Forest Clearance (Approx) Rs. 33,000,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST Rs. 14,093,199,024.03
Say Rs. 14,093,000,000.00
Project Cost per Km Rs. 176,116,697.93
Civil cost per km Rs. 136,016,355.89
Site Photographs
Site Photographs
Site Photographs
Site Photographs

Bridge at Km 27.00
Phairuang Bridge

Bridge at Km 35.13

Phairuang Bridge
Site Photographs

Tuichawng Bridge
Site Photographs
Design Standard
a) Design Standards as per the IRC Standards, Codes, Guidelines and
Special Publications besides MORT&H circulars and specifications as
applicable to National Highways has been followed.
b) In the absence of any definite provision on any particular issue,
the following standards shall be referred to in that order.
Bureau of Indian Standards
American Association of State Highway and Transport Officials
(AASHTO)
American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM)
British Standards
Any other National or International Standard as considered suitable
For this Project Highway, Geometric Design Standards shall be as per the
following:
IRC: 73-1980 shall be generally followed.
IRC: SP: 19-2001:Manual for survey, investigations and preparation of
road projects.
IRC: 52: Recommendations about the Alignment survey and Geometric
Design of Hill Roads (Second Revision).
IRC-SP-48-1998: Hill Road Manual
Design Standard

TERRAIN CLASSIFICATION
This Road Corridor is generally in mountainous terrain.
Terrain Cross Slope (%)
Plain 0 - 15
Rolling > 10 upto 25
Mountainous > 25 upto 60
Steep > 60
DESIGN SPEED:

Mountainous Terrain
Road Classification
Ruling Minimum
National Highway 50 40

RIGHT OF WAY:
Mountainous and Steep
Terrain
Sn Road Classification Built-up
Open areas
areas

National & State


Design Standard
SPECIFICATIONS
a)The material to be used in the Project work (including facilities there
on) shall conform to MORT&H Specifications for Road & Bridge Works
4th Rev. 2001.
b)Where these specifications are silent in regard to certain
specifications for the material in question, specifications under Bureau
of Indian Standard/AASHTO/ASTM/BS shall apply in that order.
Gradient
SL. Terrain Ruling Limited Exceptional
No gradient gradient gradient

1 Steep terrain up to 3,000 m 6% 7% 8%


height above mean sea level (1 in16.7) (1 in 14.3) (1 in 12.5)

Side Slope in Cutting


Sn Item Slopes of Cutting
1 Ordinary Soil / Heavy Soils 1:1
2 Ordinary / Soft Rock :1
3 Hard rock 800 to 900

Anda mungkin juga menyukai