Economics
It is a study of how
individuals and society
generally make choices
that involve the use of
scarce resources from
among alternative wants
that need to be satisfied.
the study of mankind in
the ordinary business of
life
the study of things that
we have to do with mans
material welfare
the study of the
management of scarce
resources and their use
Economics is concerned with all of
the following:
a. The behavior of individuals or group
of individuals when managing the
use of their available resources.
b. The use of resources either for
consumption (the satisfaction of
human wants) or for production (the
creation of material goods)
c. The values- or the prices- of
resources as determined by the
relative degree of their scarcity and
the intensity of wants for them
through a process of interaction
among the users and suppliers or
owners of those resources.
d. The improvement of the
standard of living over time,
or the process of economic
growth of output and
consumption.
e. The movement of output
and of prices over time
f. The distribution of income or
of output, in the present and
over time among the income
recipients or among those
THEORY
A theory may attempt to
predict as yet unobserved
facts.
A theory may become a
successful theory if its
prediction is confirmed by
actual observations, and
further, if no other theory or
explanations is found to be
consistent with those
One theory is that of
consumption and of
demand.
Another is the theory
of competition and of
the firm.
And theory on
employment and
another on the role of
Is economic a science?
Over several hundreds of years,
economics has developed into a
body of knowledge.
The economists began to
introduce rigorous methods of
inquiry that could be tested and
challenged by others in the field
using methods of inquiry that
are very varied in approaches.
Economics as a Social Science
Economics is a social
science.
It is concerned, like the
other social sciences,
with the study of
individuals, acting alone
or in groups.
Once, economics was
known as political
economy, a reference
to the fact that many
economic questions
have political and public
policy implications.
Economics may have an
advantage over other social
sciences as a scientific discipline
for two reasons:
First: The economic motives of
human beings may be observed
to occur in a regular, almost
persistent fashion that are also
more discernible or predictable.
Their economic decisions can be
tracked down through events
that register as the prices and
quantities of goods and services
Second: Those decisions are
recorded in statistics.
Within the firms or households,
these can be tracked down as
expenses or quantities used.
Governments and business
build their own statistics, on
quantities of outputs, on
amounts traded in commerce,
on prices and costs, and so on.
Normative versus Scientific
Statements
a. (Urban Resident): The price of
rice ought to be low to improve
the well-being of workers.
b. (Farmer): The price of rice
should be high enough to make
farmers prosperous.
c. After a good harvest, the price
of rice will fall. But after a bad
harvest, the price of rice will
increase.
Statements (a) and (b) are
based on the value judgments
of the persons speaking them.
Statement (a) is a sentiment
expressed by an urban dweller
who is not engaged in farming
as a livelihood.
Statement (b) is from a
farmers group, who, naturally,
seeks the well-being of farmers.
The statement (a compromise
of the first two statements) is
a value judgment, as well:
The price of rice ought to
balance the welfare of
consumers and farmers.
A statement based on a value
judgment is also known as a
normative statement.
Value judgments are
formed by many factors:
beliefs- whether they be
philosophical, religious,
cultural, or political
beliefs; self-interest; and
personal experience.
A value judgment is often
based on a personal belief
on what is proper or good
Statement (c) is a scientific
statement, also known as a
positive statement
It follows from the predictions
of the economic theory of
markets
A scientific statement can be
refuted.
To refute it requires an
alternative explanation through
an appeal to facts or theory.
Theory versus Practice
A theory is an attempt to explain
how particular events or
observations relate to one
another, usually explaining one
event as being caused by some
factors or events.
Without theory, there is only a
mass of meaningless events.
Therefore, theory and
obsevations are linked together.
A theory, therefore, must
explain what happens in
practice.
If it fails to do so, then
there must be an
alternative theory that can
better explain what
happens in practice.
Why Economic Problems Arise?
Fundamentally, human
being have many wants that
could be satisfied only at the
sacrifice of other wants or
resources.
In short, there is a price for
obtaining or satisfying those
wants: giving up some other
resource.
This is not the case with goods
that are plentiful and free.
To people living in the country,
the air is taken for granted
even though it is valuable to
living. It is because country air
is plentiful and no amount of
wanting it makes it relatively
more costly to people in the
country.
It is a free good there.
But tell that to the city
folk.
In some ways, the
scarcity of clean, fresh air
makes itself evident as a
scarce good in the big
crowded metropolis.
Given the extent of
environmental pollution.
The air and atmosphere in most
major cities have become full of
pollutants that are caused by
emissions from motor vehicles
and from factories. These fumes
dirty the air.
To get cleaner air, there is need
to use cleaner fuels that do not
give out serious pollutants.
The recommended fuel to be
used to clean the air emissions of
gasoline engines cost more.
In short, cleaner air
means higher costs.
They would have to use
more costly fuel.
Economics and Development
An understanding of economics
can improve ones appreciation
of the processes that can make
a country prosperous.
It can also lead to an awareness
about why some poor countries
fail to overcome their problems
and are trapped in poverty,
sometimes of their own making.
Economic Development
It is a process of change that
takes place in a country over
time, affecting its capacity to
improve its standard of living.
A measure of the standard of
living is the amount of output
that the economy produces
over time, and often this
translates into improved
incomes for the citizens.
Such changes affect many
aspects of a countrys
economic life: they raise
health standards, the
quality of life of the people,
and they surely improve
the level of material goods
that are within their
command to enjoy and use.
Terminologies of Development
One common terminology used
to set countries apart is to
determine whether they are
developed or industrial, or less
developed.
One such distinction- that
between developed and
developing countries- has
signaled the shift to terms that
eliminate such derisive
implications.
Countries: low-, middle-, and
high-income
Classifying countries by income
levels also provides another way
out of this terminological
dilemma.
Countries can range from very
high income to very low incomes,
then the classification using
high-, middle-, and low-income
countries has found greater favor
because it is simply descriptive.
Importance of Economics in
Nation-building
Knowledge of economic
principles is important in nation-
building.
Economics is means to a better
understanding of what needs to
be done more efficiently the
highest possible result at the
level of given resources.
Economics is a means toward
making sound decisions at all
levels- at the smallest economic
Institutions and
Development
Institutions are rules,
enforcement mechanisms, and
organizations that facilitate the
performance of economic activity.
They are the part of the behavior
norms that facilitates how we
manage scarce resources and
how we respond to changes in
economic conditions in the
market.
Standardization of weights,
measures, and currency, and
even expectations of behavior on
the part of those engaged in a
market transaction are part of
institutions.
When rules are clear and the
rights of all those in a
transaction are understood, and
the enforcement of the rules is
anticipated with confidence that
they will be realized, then the
transaction is stable and
A distinctive characteristic of
weak institutions is the
prevalence of excessive
regulations, where
enforcement of contracts is
weak, and there are many rules
of behavior among the
economic participants that
simply raise the transaction
costs of any market decisions.
Economic development is a
process that is often
characterized by the observation
that the economy becomes
increasingly dependent on the
operations and smooth
functioning of market
transactions.
In operational terms, it means
understanding what makes for
greater efficiency of markets.
SUMMARY
1. Economic is a scientific study
concerned with human behavior. It is
therefore a social science.
Its principal concern is with choices,
in the present and over time, on how
available resources can be used.
These choices cover the production of
commodities, their distribution in
terms of rewards to factors of
production and the consumption of
commodities.
It is a study concerned with mans
material welfare, now and in the
2. Economics has an
advantage over other social
sciences because the
economic behavior of human
beings occurs in a regularly
repeated fashion., and is
therefore predictable.
Secondly, there are available
economic statistics that can
be used as the basis of a lot
of theoretical and empirical
verification to help explain
3. Economic problems arise
because of the scarcity of
goods. Goods that are
valuable to life may be
abundant and for that
reason may become free
goods (like air).
Only scarce goods give
way to economic problems
of choice. Such choice is
4. Economics can be useful
in the understanding of
why countries grow or
remain poor.
- Economic development
refers to a complex process
describing changes in
economic and noneconomic
institutions, and also
includes those aspects
BASIC ECONOMIC PROBLEMS
The economic unit
An economic agent is a unit
in society (like an individual
or a firm) that confronts the
problem of how to allocate
resources to achieve what it
wants to do.
All economic agents solve an
economic problem by making
choices or decisions that will
An example of a basic
economic problem is
producing a good.
The individual or the
household is the smallest
economic unit.
The firm is the smallest
producing unit in an
economy.
The grouping of all
households in a country
constitutes the totality of
households (example: all
Filipino households).
The aggregation of all
business units in a country
constitutes the totality of
firms in that country.
Households can be
grouped by regions of one
country, or by age-group
of the head of family, or
by degree of material
possessions or income
(poor, rich, middle
income).
Firms can be grouped by
activity (rice farmers, shoe
For the household or the family,
the most basic problem concerns
the upkeep of the family.
The household undertakes a basic
decision on what mix of goods it
will use (consumption), on a given
budget, for the upkeep of the
family.
On the other hand, the firms main
problem is how to produce goods
at the cheapest possible cost.
BASIC DECISION PROBLEMS
All economic agents have to
make choices from among
alternative courses of actions.
Economics aim to analyze the
behavior of economic agents
how they decide what choices
to make, given the amount of
resources that they have
initially at their disposal.
Of all economic
activities, consumption
and production are the
most basic.
Consumption
Consumption is the
satisfaction of human wants.
It means using up goods to
satisfy those wants.
People eat to satisfy hunger.
They acquire means of
shelter to keep themselves
safe and healthy.
They use clothing for
comfort and other reasons.
From the viewpoint of those
charged with the
responsibility of maintaining
the household, the objective
is to keep the family
members healthy, happy and
secure.
Consumption is always
achieved at the cost of the
use of resources.
Governments also have
consumption decisions to make.
The government has to incur
expenditures in order to keep
performing its functions (to hire
government workers, to pay for
the purchase of materials like
office supplies, to provide books
for schools, medical supplies for
hospitals and so on).
Production
Production is the creation of
goods.
To make goods, resources
have to be used.
The primary factors of
production are labor, capital,
and land.
There are also secondary
inputs that are used in
Labor is the amount of
services rendered by
people in gainful
economic activity (that
is, while employed in a
production process).
Capital represents
machinery and
equipment goods that
are by themselves
manufactured which
are employed in the
process of production.
Land represents the
contribution of land
services that are used in
production the
productive powers of the
soil in agriculture, and
land which serves as
factory sites in industry.
Distribution
Distribution refers to the sharing
of the output among the
resources used in production.
Sometimes also referred to as
income distribution, the scope of
this area of concern covers the
manner of dividing the output of
production among labor, owners
of capital, business management,
and owners of other factors of
production.
Exchange of Goods and
Services
The following words are
interchangeable: exchange, commerce
or trade.
They mean transactions involving the
buying and selling of goods and
resources.
The interaction between the two
essential elements (the purchase of
the buyers and the sale by the sellers)
is determined by the terms of
exchange.
This is the price of the goods, or
The prices for goods and
services are determined by the
interaction of sellers and buyers.
Exchange takes place all the
time.
Trade happens between
consumers and producers;
between producers and suppliers
of services; between businesses;
and between countries.
Growth
The expansion of consumption
and production represents the
problem of economic growth.
Economic growth means
essentially that the available
goods have increased because of
increased production.
This means that the output of
goods and services has enlarged
and the economy has increased
its capacity to produce more
The rate of economic
growth depends on how
economic agents make the
allocation of resources
between the present and
the future.
To achieve growth,
choices must be made
regarding what to spare
from present enjoyment in
SCARCITY AT WORK
All economic problems happen
because of the scarcity of
resources.
Commodities that are
consumed do not come free.
To produce these commodities,
one needs to use resources or
factors of production.
SUMMARY
1. All economic agents solve an
economic problem by
deciding on the choice that
leads to the best of all
possible outcomes.
This optimization pertains to
decisions involving
consumption, production,
distribution, exchange and
growth.
2. Consumption means
using up goods to satisfy
certain wants.
The satisfaction of wants
in the household can be
undertaken in the current
period or at future period.
Businesses and
governments have
consumption decisions to
3. Production is the creation of
goods. The factors of
production are labor, capital
and land.
There are also secondary
inputs that are used in
production the goods that
are themselves raw materials
for production.
The sate of technology that is
used for production
4. Distribution refers to the
sharing of the output
among the resources used
in production.
It is concerned with the
manner of dividing the
output among labor,
owners of capital,
business management,
5. The prices for goods and
services are determined by
the interaction of sellers
and buyers.
Exchange takes place all
the time.
Trades happen between
consumers and producers;
between producers and
suppliers of services;
6. the production possibility frontier
presents the problem of choice.
The frontier represents the trade-
off between production and
consumption of two goods that
compete for the use of resources.
Along the production possibility
frontier, output is produced at full
employment of all resources.
Any point along the production
possibility schedule indicates a
combination of output of the two
goods.
Each outpt level requires the use of
7. Growth of output is the
expansion of the level of output.
Growth can come from several
sources, such as the factors of
production: growth of labor and
expansion of capital.
Technological progress means
that more inputs can be
produced from the same level of
use of the factors of production.
Another source of output growth
is the increase of savings, which
is the source of capital formation
FUNDAMENTAL
LAWS OF
ECONOMICS
There are three (3) fundamental
laws of economics that are critical to
learning of economic principles.
The firs of these the law of
diminishing marginal utility is a
law governing marginal satisfaction
derived from the consumption of
goods. This law is the cornerstone of
The second law is the law
of diminishing returns.
This law describes the
behavior of production as
inputs are added. It is basic
to am understanding of the
theory of supply.
The third fundamental law the
law of comparative advantage
concerns efficiency in
production. It is the foundation of
the law of gains from commerce
both international and domestic.
It explains why economic agents, if
given the proper opportunity to
value costs of production and what
is available in the market, will
produce the thing they are most
capable of doing at the least
CONSUMPTION: THE LAW
OF DIMINISHING
MARGINAL UTILITY
The satisfaction of human wants is
largely a psychological phenomenon.
For instance, if you love eating mangoes
and you are to eat as many mangoes as
you like on a given day, this law simply
says that there is point in that eating
experience when the last mango does
not give as much pleasure as the earlier
one.
The law of diminishing
marginal utility states that the
consumption of a good yields
increasing satisfaction (utility)
to the consumer, but the
additional satisfaction
received becomes less as
more of the good is consumed.
The additional or marginal
utility from the last good
consumed is less than the
Diminishing Marginal
Utility
The law of diminishing marginal
utility is important in
understanding how a consumer
adjust ones expenditure among
competing goods of consumption.
The idea is that the consumer, or
the household or the family unit,
is free to choose or is sovereign
over what goods to consume.
goods
When there are many goods,
the same of kind of conditions
would have to be followed,
but the art of balancing the
choice is only slightly more
intricate.
Consider the choice of
balancing the budget
between two commodities,
The marginal utilities are measured in
terms of their own prices, then what is
being compared is the marginal utility
from the good per peso of expenditure.
Therefore, it is the additional satisfaction
derived from the goods per peso of
spending that is being compared.
If the MU of sugar per peso of
expenditure is greater than the MU of fish
per peso of expenditure, then there is
greater satisfaction being enjoyed for
sugar consumption. So the consumer will
increase the amount of sugar bought.
To maximize satisfaction from
a number of choices that she
faces, it is enough to think that
she allocates the income spent
on the goods such that each
item of consumption yields the
same level of marginal
satisfaction per peso of
expenditure.
PRODUCTION: LAW OF
DIMINISHING RETURNS
As more units of labor are
added, the output will increase.
There may be a stage in the
productive effort in which the
rise in output will be very high.
The rise of output as more
labor is added begins to taper
off.
The law of diminishing
returns states that the
following: Total output rises
with the addition of more of the
variable input, while other
inputs are held constant. But
the increase in total output
diminishes with each additional
increase of the input.
THE LAW OF
COMPARATIVE
ADVANTAGE
Comparative vs. Absolute Advantage
Physical development
Infrastructure
Land distribution
Agricultural development
Farm management services
Green revolution
Crop diversification
Home management
Youth participation
Human resources
development
Personnel development (pre-
service and in-service
training)
Clientele development (farm
family education, landowner
orientation, and continuing
community education and
Program Objectives
1. To establish owner-cultivatorship
among those who live and work
on the land as tillers;
2. To create a truly viable, social,
and economic structure in
agriculture conducive to greater
productivity and higher farm
income through a cooperative
system of production,
processing, marketing,
3. To provide a more vigorous and
systematic land settlement program and
public land distribution;
4. To achieve a dignified existence for
the small farmers, free from pernicious
institutional restraints and practices;
5. to make small framers more
independent, self-reliant, and responsible
citizens, and a source of genuine
strength in our democratic society;
6. To apply all labor laws equally without
discrimination to both industrial and
agricultural wage earners;
7. to give first priority to
measures for adequate and
timely financing of the
agrarian reform program; and
8. to involve local
government in the
implementation of the
agrarian reform program.
Land Reform vs.
Agrarian Reform
Land reform means the improvement
of the farmers relationship to the
land he cultivates.
When a farmer is transformed from a
tenant into landowner, then this is a
great improvement.
In addition, he should be assisted by
the government on how to improve
his production technique and
marketing channel.
The concept of agrarian reform.
It is concerned with the total
development of the farmers
economic, social and political
transformation.
If this is successfully attained,
then the small farmer becomes a
source od genuine strength in our
democratic society.
Socio-economic
Implications of the
Program
In all the countries where the
peasants have been exploited, there
have been uprisings, rebellions, or
even revolutions.
For instance, famous revolutions like
those in France, Mexico, Russia, and
China, were led by peasants.
In our country, there were agrarian
unrests in several regions due to
However, we are one of the very
few countries which have
developed a land reform program
without a bloody revolution.
Evidently, their transformation
into landownership has greatly
changed their social status.
They feel free and equal to any
other members of the
community.
They have no more masters to
command them. Instead, they
are now the managers of their
farms.
They make their own plans and
decisions.
Such condition stimulates them
to improve their productivity
because the fruits of their labor
all go to them.
Key Information (P.D.
27)
1. Share tenancy was abolished. It
covers only rice and corn farming.
2. Family-size farms were established.
Tillers were given three (3) hectares
if irrigated or five (5) hectares if
unirrigated. The land owner may
retain not more than 7 hectares. If
he does not personally till his land, it
is to be farmed by others on
leasehold arrangement.
3. the farmer pays the land given to
him in 15 yearly amortizations plus
6% interest.
4. the price of the land granted to
the farmer is equivalent to 2 times
the average annual harvest of 3
consecutive normal years (if crops
are not destroyed by floods,
typhoons, or pests) before October
21, 1972. Then multiply the number
of cavans with the prevailing
5. The Land Bank of the Philippines,
which is the financial arm of the
agrarian reform program, pays the
landowners in any of the following
manner:
a. Cash payments of 10% and the
balance in 25-year Land Bank bonds
at 6% interest, tax-free.
b. Payment of 30% in preferred shares
of stocks issued by the Land Bank,
and the balance in 25-year LB bonds
at 6% interest, tax-free.
c. Exchange arrangement for
government stocks in in government-
owned or controlled corporations or
private corporations where the
government has holdings.
d. Cash payments of 20% and the
balance in 25-year LB bonds at 6%
interest, tax-free for landowners with
less than 25 hectares. However,
small landowners may get an
additional 10% cash payment if they
use such amount for the security of
their childrens future, education, and
6. No land acquired by the
farmer through the agrarian
reform is transferable, except by
hereditary succession. If there is
no heir, he can sell it to the
government for redistribution to
other qualified tillers.
7. Conversion of tenanted rice
and corn farms into non-
agricultural use or any other
crops in order to avoid the
Key Information (CARP No. 6657)
1. The comprehensive Agrarian Reform
Program covers all public and private
agricultural lands, including other lands of
the public domain suitable for agriculture.
2. Ownership of agricultural lands is based
on a family-size farm which is not more
than 3 hectares. The landowner can retain
5 hectares. Three (3) hectares may be
awarded to each child of the landowner, if
he is not less than 15 years old and if he
is actually cultivating, or directly
managing his farm. Landowners under
3. Qualified beneficiaries in the following order of
priority are the agricultural lessees and share
tenants, regular farmworkers, seasonal farmworkers,
other farmworkers, actual tillers or occupants of
public lands, collectives or cooperatives of the
aforementioned beneficiaries and others directly
working on the land.
4. The distribution of all lands covered by CARP shall
be implemented within 10 years effective
immediately upon signing of the law by President
Corazon C. Aquino on June 10, 1988. however, the
application of CARP on private commercial lands,
such as livestock, poultry, piggery, aquaculture
(fishponds, saltbeds, and prawn ponds), fruit farms,
orchards, vegetable, and cut-flower farms, and
cacao, coffee, and rubber plantations, has been
deferred for 10 years.
5. exemptions and exclusions include
lands for wildlife, forest reserves,
reforestation, fish sanctuaries, and
breeding grounds, watersheds and
mangroves, national defense, school
sites and campuses, experimental
farm stations, seeds and seeding
research and pilot production centers,
church sites and convents, mosque
sie and islamic centers, cemeteries,
penal colonies, penal farms, and
government and private research and
6. Payments to landowners:
25% cash and 75%
government bonds for above
50 hectares; 30% cash and
70% government bonds for
above 24 hectares and up to
50 hectares; and 35% cash
and 65% government bonds
for 24 hectares and below.
Payments are made in 10
7. Beneficiaries pay Land Bank
of the Philippines in 30 annual
amortization at 6% interest per
annum.
8. Valuation of lands is
determined by PARC (Presidential
Agrarian Reform, Council headed
by the President of the
Philippines). The value of the
lands depends on the costs of
their acquisition, current values,
Critical Analysis of the
Agrarian Reform Program
The main goal of the Philippine
agrarian reform program is to increase
the harvests and income of the poor
farmers.
Therefore, they are required to apply
modern agricultural technology (or
American technology) and to join
farmers, cooperatives.
This means they have to buy the farm
The World Bank finances the
productivity objective of the
agrarian reform program. But the
social and economic justice
aspect of the program has been
neglected.
It appears that the real objective
of the United States or World
Bank in supporting the program
is to be able to channel the farm
inputs of the malnutritional
corporations into the farms of the
The rationale of the agrarian reform program is
that when a poor farmer owns the land he is
cultivating, he is naturally more interested to
improve his harvest. This is true if:
1. The owner has sufficient area of land to till for
the adequate support himself and his family;
2. The agrarian reform provides permanent
security of tenure to beneficiaries.
3. The necessary credit is made available to the
new landowners on the benevolent terms which
do not make them slaves of the lenders; and
4. The agrarian reform program allows the small
farmers to make decisions as to what and how
to produce and what and how to sell their
products.
COVERAGE
Section 4. Scope The
Comprehensive Agrarian Reform
Law of 1989 shall cover,
regardless of tenurial
arrangement and commodity
produced, all public and private
agricultural lands, as provided in
Proclamation No. 131 and
Executive Order No. 229,
including other lands of the
public domain suitable for
More specifically the following lands
are covered by the Comprehensive
Agrarian Reform Program:
(a) All alienable and disposable lands
of the public domain devoted to or
suitable for agriculture. No
reclassification of forest or mineral
lands to agricultural lands shall be
undertaken after the approval of this
Act until Congress, taking into
account ecological, developmental
and equity considerations, shall have
determined by law, the specific limits
(b) All lands of the public domain in
excess of the specific limits as
determined by Congress in the
preceding paragraph;
(c) All other land owned by the
Government devoted to or suitable
for agricultural;
(d) All private lands devoted to or
suitable for agriculture regardless of
the agricultural products raised or
that can be raised thereon.
Implementation the distribution
of all lands covered by this Act
shall be implemented immediately
and completed within 10 years
from the effectivity thereof.
May it be argued that distribution of all
lands under R.A. 6657 must be
implemented and covered within the
original 10 year period rather than
extended period?
Yes, because Section 5 and Section 7
of the CARL are clearly mandatory.
However, while R.A. 6657 was
enacted on June 10, 1988 and the 10
year period would have expired on
June 10, 1998, RA 8532 was enacted
also in 1998 apparently extending
the period for implementation up to
2008 by amending section 63 of the
CARL, to read as follows: The
amount needed to implement this Act
(CARL) until 2008 shall be funded
from the Agrarian Reform Fund.
Note that RA 8532 expressly
amended section 63 of RA
6657 (CARL) by providing
additional funding to implement
RA 6657. However, there is no
mention of extending the 10 year
period for the distribution of
lands acquired under RA 6657.
What aspects of agrarian reform still
require funding and implementation if the
distribution should have already been
completed by 1998?
(1) Every year, portions of bonds issued for
the payment of land mature, and these
must be funded.
(2) Support services are needed to maintain
the viability of lands previously acquired
for agrarian reform.
(3) There is still so much land covered under
the law for which no payment of just
compensation has been made. There are
some just compensation cases still being
Note also that Section 11 of RA 6657
provides for a shift in the types of land
placed under DARs coverage from
lands covered by section 4 in relation to
section 5 (during the ten years from
1988 to 1998), to commercial farms
mandated under Section 11 to be subject
to immediate compulsory acquisition and
distribution after 10 years from the
effectivity of this Act. Note the clear
shift in Section 11 of lands to be acquired
after expiry of the first ten years.
Section 11. Commercial Farming
Commercial farms, which are private
agricultural lands devoted to
saltbeds, fruit farms, orchards,
vegetable and cut-flower farms,
and cacao, coffee and rubber
plantations, shall be subject to
immediate compulsory acquisition and
distribution after 10 years from the
effectivity of this Act.
In the case of new farms, the 10-
year period shall begin from the first
year of commercial production and
During the ten-year period, the
government shall initiate the
steps necessary to acquire these
lands, upon the payment of just
compensation for the land and
the improvements thereon,
preferably in favor of organized
cooperatives or associations,
which shall hereafter manage the
said lands for the worker-
beneficiaries.
Section 6. Retention Limits Except
as otherwise provided in this Act, no
person may own or retain, directly or
indirectly, any public or private
agricultural land, the size of which
shall vary according to factors
governing a viable family-size farm,
such as commodity produced, terrain,
infrastructure, and soil fertility as
determined by the Presidential
Agrarian Reform Council (PARC)
created hereunder, but in no case
shall retention by the landowner
Three hectares may be awarded to each child
of the landowner, subject to the following
qualifications: (1) that he is at least fifteen
years of age; and (2) that he is actually tilling
the land or directly managing the farm:
Provided, that landowners whose lands have
been covered by Presidential Decree No. 27
shall be allowed to keep the areas originally
retained by them thereunder: Provided,
further, that original homestead grantees or
their direct compulsory heirs who still own the
original homestead at the time of the approval
of this Act shall retain the same areas as long
as they continue to cultivate said homestead.
The right to choose the area to be
retained, which shall be compact or
contiguous, shall pertain to the
landowner: Provided, however, that in
case the area selected for retention by
the landowner is tenanted, the tenant
shall have the option to choose whether
to remain therein or be a beneficiary in
the same or another agricultural land
with similar and comparable features.
In case the tenant chooses to remain in
the retained area, he shall be
considered a leaseholder and shall lose
his right to be a beneficiary under this
In case the tenant chooses to be a
beneficiary in another agricultural land,
he loses his right as a leaseholder to
the land retained by the landowner. The
tenant must exercise this option within
a period of one year from the time the
landowner manifests his choice of the
area for retention.
In all cases, the security of tenure of
the farmers or farmworkers ion the land
prior to the approval of this Act shall be
respected.
Upon the effectivity of this Act, any sale,
disposition, lease, management, contract or
transfer of possession of private land
executed by the original landowner in
violation of the Act shall be null and void:
Provided, however, that those executed prior
to this Act shall be valid only when registered
with the Register of Deeds within a period of
three months after the effectivity of this Act.
Thereafter, all Registers of Deeds shall inform
the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR)
within 30 days of any transaction involving
agricultural lands in excess of five hectares.
retention limit reasonable and
beneficial to the landowners, the
farmers and the country as a
whole?
At the time when the CARP was enacted in
1987, 88% of private agricultural lands were
owned by small landowners of which at least
66% were in at poverty level.
During the deliberations of the CARP, it was
pointed out that if the retention limit was fixed
at 24 hectares, only 5% of private agricultural
land would be affected. In the language of
Cong. Cojuangco, in other words, 95% of
private agricultural land are owned by people
owning 24 hectares and below. Are these the
In September 1993, the Social Weather
Station, Inc. conducted a national
survey in the countryside and found
that, on the average, only 18% were
better off after launching of the CARP
while 38% were worse off. Furthermore,
only 10% of agricultural workers
claimed they were better off while 47%
stated they were worse off.
Apparently, because the farms were of
smaller sizes, even agricultural workers
hired by these farms were
disadvantaged, because their
employers could no longer expand
to determine the proper retention
limits?
Article XIII, section 4 of the Constitution explicitly
provides that the just distribution of all
agricultural lands shall be subject to such
priorities and reasonable retention limits as the
Congress may prescribe. It is Congress then and
not any other entity which is authorized and
required to fix the priorities and retention limits.
Although legislative power may be delegated, such
delegation is not constitutionally permissible where
the Constitution itself requires Congress to deal
with specific matter. Even in those instances where
delegation is possible, Congress must establish a
standard fully in accord with the Constitution.
However, section 6 of RA 6657
delegates effectively to the PARC
authority to fix the retention limit.
And not only is the authority
delegated to PARC, but the factors
which PARC is required to consider
are not limited to those provided by
the Constitution itself which are the
ecological, developmental or equity
considerations.
This is, apparently, an undue delegation of
legislative power in that the discretion to
set the standards and priorities, conferred
by the Constitution upon Congress, is
further delegated by Congress to PARC. It is
well-established that the law which is
incomplete and confers upon the delegate
the discretion to determine what the law
should be, is void. As the Supreme Court
has explained:
what valid delegation presupposes and
sanctions is an exercise of discretion within
specific or designated limits provided by
law, the absence of which will constitute
such exercise as undue delegation, if not an
Is it the issuance of CLOAs to
the landowners children
legally correct?
The law specifically provides that
in no case shall the retention by
the landowners exceed five
hectares. Three hectares may be
awarded to each child of the
landowner provided that he is at
least 15 years of age and he is
actually tilling the land or directly
managing the farm.
DAR AO No. 8, series of 1997,
states:
No beneficiary who is related to
the LO up to the second degree of
consanguinity shall be considered
as an awardee under CRAP, unless a
tenancy relationship with the
landowner actually exists or has
been established prior to June 15,
1988, the effectivity date of the
Comprehensive Agrarian Reform
Law.
of 1997 of the requirement of a tenancy
relationship between the LO and his
child (relative to the second degree) a
valid and effective amendment of the
law?
RA 6657, section 6 provides that
Three hectares may be awarded to
each child of the landowner, subject
to the following qualifications: (1)
that he is at least fifteen years of
age; and (2) that he is actually tilling
the land or directly managing the
farm.
Both actually make the application of
the term preferred beneficiary to
It should be noted that the provision
did not impose the same age limit of
15 years if age when CARL took
effect on June 15, 1988. imposing this
age requirement on the preferred
beneficiary, in addition to the
requirement that the tenancy
relationship should exist during the
effectivity of CARL, actually places
the preferred beneficiary in a more
disadvantageous position than the
tenant or the latters children.
a uniform retention limit for
all types of lands?
The uniform redistribution formula applied
by the CARP on all lands; i.e., the same
retention limit for each landowner and the
same area of each beneficiary, ignores the
profound technical and economic
differences between agricultural areas.
This undiscriminating approach, in fact,
enlarges even more the need for well-
planned and well-executed support services,
since much of these will have to aim all at
compensating at enormous cost, for the
distortion effects of treating rice, sugar,
Is a homestead subject to CARL?
Section 6 above, among others,
provides that the original homestead
grantees or their direct compulsory
heirs who still own the original
homestead at the time of the approval
of the CARL shall retain the same area
as long as they continue to cultivate
said homestead. Therefore, a
homestead shall not be subject to
compulsory coverage if the following
conditions are present:
(1)The original homestead grantee
or his direct compulsory heir still
owns the original homestead at
the time of the effectivity of the
CARL;
(2)The original homestead grantee
or his direct compulsory heir(s)
was cultivating the homestead as
of the effectivity of the CARL on
June 18, 1989.
infirmities in section 6 of
CARL?
Yes, they are as follows:
> Article XIII, section 4, of the
Constitution explicitly provides
that the just distribution of all
agricultural lands shall be subject
to such priorities and reasonable
retention limits as the Congress
may prescribe.
Does failure to apply for
retention constitute an
estoppel or waiver of the
rightof retention?
No. the failure of the landowners to
apply for retention of this agricultural
landholdings does not constitute an
estoppel or waiver of their respective
right of retention. A timely protest
against the issuance of the
certificates of land transfer to the
petitioners cures the omission.
Is personal cultivation a
mandatory precondition to be
entitled to retention?
No, personal cultivation is not a
mandatory precondition for retention.
The landowner is not disqualified to
retain his share of the agricultural
lands of the estate for failure to
comply with the requirement that
such landowner is cultivating such
area, or will now cultivate it.
The Secretary of Agriculture himself
interpreted that provision to mean
that the tenants on the exempted
and retained areas shall remain as
agricultural lessees therein.
In other words, while ownership of
the exempted and retained areas
shall pertain to the landowner, the
tenants, as agricultural lessees, shall
remain as such and cultivate the
same.
What happens if the area that
the landowner chooses to
retain is tenanted?
In case the area selected for
retention by the landowner is
tenanted, the tenant shall have the
following options:
(1)Remain in the retained area: the
tenant shall be considered as
leaseholder and shall lose his right
to be a beneficiary; or
(2)Be a beneficiary in other agricultural
land: the tenant shall lose his right
What can be done if, after
Certificates of Land Transfer
have been issued, it is
discovered that the landowner
has been illegally denied his
right of retention?