Internal Analysis:
Resources,
Capabilities, and
Activities
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Part 1 Strategy Analysis
42
LO 4-1 Distinguish among a firms resources, capabilities, core
competencies, and firm activities.
LO 4-2 Differentiate between tangible and intangible resources.
LO 4-3 Describe the critical assumptions behind the resource-based view.
LO 4-4 Apply the VRIO framework to assess the competitive implications
of a firms resources.
LO 4-5 Identify competitive advantage as residing in a network of firm
activities.
LO 4-6 Outline how dynamic capabilities can help a firm sustain
competitive advantage.
LO 4-7 Identify different conditions that allow firms to sustain their
competitive advantage.
LO 4-8 Conduct a SWOT analysis.
43
Chapter Case 4 From Good to Great to Gone:
Circuit City
Internal focus
Core Competencies
Strategic Fit
Internalstrengths change with the
external environment
45
EXHIBIT 4.1 Creating Strategic Fit to Leverage Internal Strengths
46
The Role of Strategy in Business is to Generate and
Sustain Value via the Linkages Between Position,
Organization, and Resources
Positioning
47
Positioning
Geographic scope
Vertical integration
decisions
Organization
Structure
Formal definition of authority
Conflict resolution
Systems
Rules, routines, evaluation and rewards
Processes
Informal communication, networks, and recruitment
4-9
Resources and Capabilities
Tangible resources
e.g., physical capital
Organizational capabilities
e.g., routines and standard operating procedures
Intangible resources
e.g., trademarks, know-how
411
EXHIBIT 4.2 Linking Resources and Capabilities to Firm Performance
EXHIBIT 4.3 Company Examples of Core Competencies & Applications
413
414
LO 4-1 Distinguish among a firms resources, capabilities, core
competencies, and firm activities.
LO 4-2 Differentiate between tangible and intangible resources.
LO 4-3 Describe the critical assumptions behind the resource-based
view.
LO 4-4 Apply the VRIO framework to assess the competitive implications
of a firms resources.
LO 4-5 Identify competitive advantage as residing in a network of firm
activities.
LO 4-6 Outline how dynamic capabilities can help a firm sustain
competitive advantage.
LO 4-7 Identify different conditions that allow firms to sustain their
competitive advantage.
LO 4-8 Conduct a SWOT analysis. 415
EXHIBIT 4.4 Tangible and Intangible Resources
416
The Resource-based View
Google Example
Tangible resources valued at $5 billion
Intangible brand valued at over $100 billion
Googleplex has both tangible and intangible aspects
Resource heterogeneity
Bundles of resources and capabilities differ across firms
Southwest Airlines and Alaska Airlines have different
resources
SWA
Higher employee productivity
Informal organization, pilots help load luggage
Resource immobility
Resources tend to be sticky and do not move easily
Southwest Airlines sustained advantage
Several decades superior performance
Competitors have unsuccessfully imitated SWA model
419
LO 4-1 Distinguish among a firms resources, capabilities, core
competencies, and firm activities.
LO 4-2 Differentiate between tangible and intangible resources.
LO 4-3 Describe the critical assumptions behind the resource-based view.
LO 4-4 Apply the VRIO framework to assess the competitive
implications of a firms resources.
LO 4-5 Identify competitive advantage as residing in a network of firm
activities.
LO 4-6 Outline how dynamic capabilities can help a firm sustain
competitive advantage.
LO 4-7 Identify different conditions that allow firms to sustain their
competitive advantage.
LO 4-8 Conduct a SWOT analysis.
420
EXHIBIT 4.5 Applying RBV: Decision Tree Competitive Implications
STRATEGY HIGHLIGHT 4.1 How Nintendo Focused on
the Casual Gamer
Video Gaming Business
$22 billion in 2009, growing to $60 billion in 2013
Nintendo DS in 2004
Competition continues
123
LO 4-1 Distinguish among a firms resources, capabilities, core
competencies, and firm activities.
LO 4-2 Differentiate between tangible and intangible resources.
LO 4-3 Describe the critical assumptions behind the resource-based view.
LO 4-4 Apply the VRIO framework to assess the competitive implications
of a firms resources.
LO 4-5 Identify competitive advantage as residing in a network of firm
activities.
LO 4-6 Outline how dynamic capabilities can help a firm sustain
competitive advantage.
LO 4-7 Identify different conditions that allow firms to sustain their
competitive advantage.
LO 4-8 Conduct a SWOT analysis.
424
The Value Chain
Primary Activities
Add value directly in transforming inputs into outputs
Raw materials through production to customers
Support Activities
Indirectly add value
Provide support to the primary activities
Information systems, human resources, accounting, etc.
80
Profit
70
Marketing: Promotions
60
Marketing: Advertising
Cents per unit
50
Outbound logistics
40
Operations: Manufacturing
30 Operations: Packaging
20 Operations: Ingredients
10
90
80
Profit
70
Marketing: Promotions
60
Cents per unit
50 Marketing: Advertising
Outbound logistics
40
Operations: Manufacturing
30
20 Operations: Packaging
10 Operations: Ingredients
0
Hostess Little Debbie Ontario Baking Savory Pastries
429
Strategic Coherence
The Logic of How The Business Fits Together:
Limited No
No seat
passenger connections
assignments
amenities with other
airlines
Short-haul,
point-to-point
Frequent, Limited use routes between
reliable 15-minute of travel Standardized midsize cities
departures gate agents fleet of 737 and secondary
turnarounds aircraft airports
Automatic
ticketing
Lean, highly machines
High
productive Very low
compensation
of employees ground and ticket prices
gate crews
High
Flexible High level Southwest,
aircraft
union of employee the low-fare
stock utilization airline
contracts
ownership
31
Strategic Coherence
A fit among corporate, business, and functional strategy;
A fit between strategy formulation and implementation;
432
Strategic Coherence
Combining activities that complement and reinforce one
another. These activities dovetail together to help achieve
the overall objectives of the firm.
433
Strategic Coherence
A sustainable competitive advantage often requires trade-
offs. These tradeoffs arise for at least three reasons:
Vanguard Example
A global investment firm - $1.4 trillion managed assets
Emphasis on low customer cost and quality service
Among the lowest expense ratios in the industry (0.20%)
Updated the activity system from 1997 to 2011
New customer segmentation core
Two new support activities
Permits customized offerings: long-term and more active traders
435
EXHIBIT 4.7 Vanguard Groups Activity System 1997
Legend
Core
Support
436
EXHIBIT 4.8 Vanguard Groups Activity System 2011
Legend
Core
Support
437
Dynamic Capabilities Perspective
439
STRATEGY HIGHLIGHT 4.2 IBMs Dynamic Strategic Fit
Moved IBM downstream toward services and thus higher value added
140
EXHIBIT 4.9 IBM Product Scope 1993 and 2010
441
LO 4-1 Distinguish among a firms resources, capabilities, core
competencies, and firm activities.
LO 4-2 Differentiate between tangible and intangible resources.
LO 4-3 Describe the critical assumptions behind the resource-based view.
LO 4-4 Apply the VRIO framework to assess the competitive implications
of a firms resources.
LO 4-5 Identify competitive advantage as residing in a network of firm
activities.
LO 4-6 Outline how dynamic capabilities can help a firm sustain
competitive advantage.
LO 4-7 Identify different conditions that allow firms to sustain their
competitive advantage.
LO 4-8 Conduct a SWOT analysis.
442
How to Protect a
Competitive Advantage
2. Path Dependence
Current alternatives are limited by past decisions
U.S. is the only industrial nation not on the metric system
Hondas core competency in gas engines took decades to build
443
How to Protect a
Competitive Advantage
3. Causal Ambiguity
Cause of success or failure are not apparent
Why has Apple had such a string of successful products?
Role of Steve Jobs vision?
Unique talents of the Apple design team?
Timing of product introductions?
4. Social Complexity
Two or more systems interact creating many possibilities
A group of 3 people has 3 relationships
445
EXHIBIT 4.11 Strategic Questions in the SWOT Analysis
446