Review

School Performance indicators

 Net enrolment rate
Enrolment increase
Drop Out rate
Cohort Survival rate
Completion rate
Achievement rate
In 2000, a convergence of 189 UN
member countries and at least 23
international organizations in a
millennium summit following the
adoption of the UN millennium
declaration have agreed to achieve
the Eight (8) Millenium Goals
2. Achieve universal primary education
Along this MDG, The Six (6) EFA goals
were adopted by the worlds
government.
1. Expand early childhood care and
development.
2. Provide free and compulsory primary
education for all.
3. Promote learning and life skills for
young people and adult.
4.Increase adult literacy.
5.Achieve gender parity.
6.Achieve the quality of
education.
The EFA and the MDGs are
complimentary
 Our baseline Our Goal

2011 2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

P.I. results

4 years

PH, DOR is 7.06 % 2% 2% 2% 2%

NPS is 0 DO
By 2015-2016
THEMATIC AREAS & ITS INDICATORS

1. ACCESS - 45 %

a. Net enrolment rate

b. Enrolment increase
 access

Indica 2016 Increase/Decrease

Baseline
Goal
tor 1 2 3
Margin Average High
al
Net
85% 90% 95%
enrolme 100% 76.61 enrolm Enrolm
nt rate Enrol
ent ent ment
 access

Indica 2016 Increase/Decrease

Baseline
Goal
tor 1 2 3
Margin Average High
al
Enrolme
nt 3% 5% 7%
increase
2. EFFICIENCY - ( 25%)
a. Drop Out rate
b. Completion rate
c. Cohort Survival rate
 EFFICIENCY
Indicat 2016 Increase/Decrease
Baseline
Goal 1 2 3
or Marginal Average High

Drop Out
rate 0% 7.06 2% 4% 0%
Completion
rate 100% 75% 5% 7% 10%
Cohort
survival rate 100% 76 5% 7% 10%
3.QUALITY - ( 30% )

a. Achievement rate ( MPS)

 QUALITY
Indicat 2016 Increase/Decrease
Baseline
Goal
1 2 3
or Marginal Average High
Achievement
rate

a. Elem. 75% 67% 2% 5% 7%

b. Secondary 75% 48% 7% 8% 10%

OPTION2:
1.Marginal: 76 100 %
2.Average : 51 75 %
3.High : 26 - 50 %
1. ACCESS Baseline Marginal Average High GOAL

a. Net Enrolment 76.61 % 85% enrol 90% Enrol 95% Enrol 100%
rate

b. Enrolment 3 % incr.. 5 % incr. 7 % incr.

Increase

2. EFFICIENCY
7.06 % 2% decrs. 4% decr. 0 % DR 0 DR
a. Drop- Out -rate

b. Completion rate 75 % 5% incr. 7% incr. 10% incr. 100%

c. Cohort Survival
rate 76 % 5% incr.
S 7% incr. 10% incr. 100%

3. QUALITY

a. Elementary 67 % 2% incr. 5% incr. 7% incr. 75%

b. Secondary 48% 7% incr. 8% incr. 10% incr. 75%

 Part I. Computation for the 60%
Performance Improvement

1. Demonstrate an acceptable
performance improvement over a
period of 3 years
2. Each thematic area is given weights
based on expected organizational
outcomes as to: Access 45 %, Efficiency
25 %, Quality 30 %
THEMATIC AREA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
NET ENROLMENT INCREASE OF
RATE ENROLMENT
SY 2009 - 2010
SY 2010 - 2011
ACCESS SY 2011 - 2012
AVERAGE % INCREASE
OF ENROLMENT
45% ENROLMENT PERCENTAGE OF
INCREASE INCREASE
SY 2009 - 2010
SY 2010 - 2011
SY 2011 - 2012
AVERAGE INCREASE
3. Get the average percentage
of increase/decrease of the
Three year school performance
result;

4. Determine the score for each

indicator if (1) Marginal (2)
Average ( 3) High
Note: Get the average
score if indicators are more
one (1)
THEMATIC RATING &
AREA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS EQUIVALENT
POINTS
NET ENROLMENT INCREASE OF
RATE ENROLMENT
SY 2009 - 2010 1 Marginal: at least
88% 85% enrolment
SY 2010 - 2011 2 - Average: at least
90%
ACCESS 90 % enrolment
3 High: at least 95%
SY 2011 - 2012 91% enrolment
AVERAGE % INCREASE
45 % OF ENROLMENT
89.6%
ENROLMENT PERCENTAGE
INCREASE OF INCREASE
SY 2009 - 2010 1 Marginal: at least
5% 3% increase
5: Multiply percentage
weight by raw score. This is
true to all indicators. Add
up the raw scores for all
thematic areas, the
resulting score will tell its
category and interval score.
 RATING & COMPUTATI
AREA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS EQUIVALENT POINTS ON RESULTS
NET ENROLMENT INCREASE OF
RATE ENROLMENT
SY 2009 - 2010 88% 1 Marginal: at least
85% enrolment
SY 2010 - 2011 90% 2 - Average: at least
90 % enrolment
SY 2011 - 2012 91% 3 High: at least 95%
enrolment
ACCESS AVERAGE % 89.6%
INCREASE OF 2x0.45% 0.9
ENROLMENT
45 % ENROLMENT PERCENTAGE
INCREASE OF INCREASE
SY 2009 - 2010 5% 1 Marginal: at least
3% increase
SY 2010 - 2011 4% 2 - Average: at least
5% increase
SY 2011 - 2012 5% 3 High: at least 7%
increase
Thematic Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points Compu Result
Area tation s
Net % of
enrolment enrolment 1.Marginal: at least 85% enrol
rate

SY 2009-10 88% 2. Average: at least 90% enrol

SY 2010-11 90% 3. High: at least 95% enrol
SY 2011-12 91%
Access
(45%) Ave. % of 89.6 % 2x 0.45 0.9
Increase:
Net % of
Enrolment increase
SY 2009-10 5% 1. Marginal: at least 3% incr.

SY 2010-11 4% 2. Average: at least 5% incr.

SY 2011-12 5% 3. High: at least 7% incr.

Ave. % of
Increase: 4.66 %
 SY 2009-10 1 1 Marginal: At least 2% decrease

SY 2010-11 1 2 Average: At least 4% decrease

SY 2011-12 0 3 High: Has 0 DR

Ave. % of
Decrease:
0.66
Completion Rate % of Increase Baseline: 75%

SY 2009-10 8
_3_x 0.25 0.75
Efficiency 1 Marginal: At least 5% increase
(25%) SY 2010-11 9 2 Average: At least 7% increase

SY 2011-12 10 3 High: At least 10% increase

Ave. % of
Increase 9
Cohort Survival % of Increase Baseline: 76%

SY 2009-10 9 1 Marginal: At least 5% increase

SY 2010-11 9 2 Average: At least 7% increase

SY 2011-12 10 3 High: At least 10% increase

Ave. % of
Increase
9.33
 % of
NAT Incre
ase
SY 2009-10 70
Quality SY 2010-11 66 1. Marginal: 26 50%
2 x 0.30 0.6
( 30%) SY 2011-12 74
2. Average: 51 75%
Ave. % of 70
Increase: 3. High: 76 100%
2.25
Name of School: ____________________________________________________ Division: ___________________________________
Thematic Area Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points Computation Results
Enrolment Increase % of Increase

Access SY 2009-10 5 1 Marginal: At least 3% increase

SY 2010-11 4 2 Average: At least 5% increase ___2___x 0.45 = 0.9

(45%)
SY 2011-12 5 3 High: At least 7% increase

Ave. % of Increase: 4.66

Dropout Rate (DR): % of decrease Baseline: 7.06

SY 2009-10 1 1 Marginal: At least 2% decrease

SY 2010-11 1 2 Average: At least 4% decrease

SY 2011-12 0 3 High: Has 0 DR

Ave. % of Decrease: 0.66

Completion Rate (CR): % of Increase Baseline: 75%

Efficiency SY 2009-10 8 1 Marginal: At least 5% increase

(25%) ____3__ x 0.25 =
SY 2010-11 9 2 Average: At least 7% increase 0.75
SY 2011-12 10 3 High: At least 10% increase

Ave. % of Increase 9

Cohort Survival Rate (CSR): % of Increase Baseline: 76%

SY 2009-10 9 1 Marginal: At least 5% increase

SY 2010-11 9 2 Average: At least 7% increase

SY 2011-12 10 3 High: At least 10% increase

Ave. % of Increase 9.33

Sub-total (DR+CR+CSR):

NAT MPS % of Increase

Quality SY 2009-10 70 1 Marginal: 26 50%

(30%) __2_ x 0.30 =
SY 2010-11 66 2 Average: 51 75% 0.6
SY 2011-12 74 3 High: 76 100%

Ave. % of Increase: 70

Sub total 2.25

6: Determine the learning outcome
classification of the 60% performance
indicator:
Categories Interval scores

Good 0.5 1.49

Better 1.5 2.49

Best 2.5 3.0

 Part II: Add up the 60% P.I. & 40%
D.O.D
1. The resulting score of performance
indicator shall be multiplied by 60%

2. The resulting score based on DOD

shall be multiplied by 40%

3. Add up the two criteria and the

resulting levels are describe as
follows
 Areas Weight Computation Results
A. Performance Improvement 60% 2.25 x 0.60 1.35
B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 40% 1.71 x 0.40 0.68
TOTAL 100% 2.03

Interpretation: ___________ Developing (Level I)

______/_____ Maturing (Level II)
___________ Advanced (Level III)

Description of SBM Level of Practice:

Numerical Rating Scale Description

0.50 1.49 Developing
1.50 2.49 Maturing
2.50 3.00 Advanced
 Levels Numerical Description
equiv.
With acceptable level and extent of
Level 1 0.5 1.49 community participation.
( Developing) Has impact on learning outcomes

Level II Introducing and sustaining continuous

( Maturing ) 1.5 2.49 improvement process
a. Integrates wider community
Participation and;
b. Improve significantly performance
and learning outcomes.
Ensuring the production of intended
Level III output/outcomes.
(Advanced) for 2.5 3.0 Meeting all standards of a system fully
Accreditation integrated in the local community
And is self renewing and self
 PASBE GUIDING PRINCIPLES

To be successful!
School accreditation must be a sustained ,
collaborative effort of the Central, Regional, Division
offices and the school community.

To be highly credible!
The accrediting entity must be an external or at
least an independent body.
 To be trustworthy!

School accreditation must be firm in principle, and

rigorous in process, but inspiring and friendly in
approach.

Accreditation should promote a culture of

cooperation rather than competition.
Text message sent