1
Departemen Teknik Industri
Management Science
Decision Solution
Action Kriteria
Real
System
Model
Problem IE Standard
Data /Information
Dont Confuse
Root
Symptom
Causes
Problem Alternatif
Solusi
Framework
Decision Criteria
Problem Constraint Parameter
Variable Performance
No
Yes
Model Standard? Formulate
Solution
Analysis of
Real System
Implementation Problem
of Finding Formulation
Analysis of Model
Model Building
Falsafah Teknik Industri - Management 7
Science Approach
Departemen Teknik Industri
Classical Operation
Simulation
Quantitative Research
Model
Approach Model
Classical Quantitative
Approach
Taxonomi Problem
Catatan :
S
(X X) 2
n 1
Wilson Formula
Formulasi Problem
Bagaimana Menentukan Kebijakan
Inventori Optimal ?
Komponen Model
Decision Criteria
Problem Constraint Parameter
Variable Performance
Bagaimana Economic Order Minimasi Ongkos - Ongkos Pesan
Menentukan Quantity(EOQ ) Tahunan Ongkos Simpan
Kebijakan Re-Order Point
Inventori Optimal (ROP )
?
Performance Criteria
Ongkos Inventori Total ( Ot )
Ot = O b + O p + Os
Posisi Inventori
C
A B t
Posisi Inventori
Formulasi Model
Min O = O + O + O
t b p s
Dimana:
Ob = Dp
Op = AD/Qo
Os = hQo/2
Formulasi Model
Min Ot = Ob + Op + Os
= Dp + AD/Qo + hQo/2
Solusi Model
Syarat Ot minimal:
Ot/Qo = 0
2
-AD/Q + h/2 =0
o
1/2
Qo = {2AD/h}
Solusi Optimal
1/2
Qo = {2AD/h}
= { 2. 1000000.10000/2000}
Qo = 3165 unit
No
Yes
Model Standard? Formulate
Solution
Model
Representation Purpose
Model Iconic - Model Descriptive
Model Analog - Model Predictive
Model Symbolic - Model Normative
Performance of Model
Valid
Simple
Robust
Adaptive
Complete
Controllable
Communicable
Falsafah Teknik Industri - Management 31
Science Approach
Departemen Teknik Industri
Solution
Solve the Problem
Reflect Variable Decision
Input For Making Decision
Performance Criteria
A. Types
1. Single Criteria
2. Multi Criteria
B. Level of Management
1. Company level
2. Business level
3. Operational level
Components Model
Performance Criteria
Decision Variable
Constraints
Parameter
Logical Relationship
Komponen Model
Decision Criteria
Problem Constraint Parameter
Variable Performance
Model Formulation
Linear Programming
Asumsi :
Proprotionality
Additivity
Integrality
Model Formulation :
General Model
Objective Function:
Min Z = c1X1 + c2X2 + c3X3 + c4X4 + .+ cnXn
Subject to:
1. a11X1 + a12X2 +a13 X3 + a14X4 + + a1nXn <= B1
2. a21X1 + a22X2 +a23 X3 + a24X4 + + a2nXn <= B2
3. a31X1 + a32X2 +a33 X3 + a34X4 + + a3nXn <= B3
. .
. .
m. am1X1 + am2X2 +am3 X3 + am4X4 + + amnXn <= Bm
X1, X2, X3, X4 Xn >= 0
Komponen Model
Decision Criteria
Problem Constraint Parameter
Variable Performance
Bagaimana 1. Number of Profit/week 1. Material 1. Profit
mengatur jackets 2. Sewing 2. Material Usage
produced/week 3. Sewing
produksi yang requirement
optimal ? 2. Number of slack
produced/week
Component of Model
Performance Criteria
Profit/week z
Decision Variables
Number of jackets produced/week x1
Number of slack produced/week x2
Constraints
Material : 50 m2/week
Sewing : 36 manhours/week
Parameter
Jacket Slack
Profit 10 15 ($/unit)
Usage of material 2 5 (m2/unit)
Sewing requirement 4 2 (manhour/unit)
Logical Relationship
liner
Formulation of Model
Objective function : V = f ( Xi, Yi, Ai )
Constraints : f ( Xi, Yi, Ai ) < Bi
Objective function : Z = 10 x1 + 15 x2
Constraints:
Material : 2 x1 + 5 x2 <= 50
Sewing : 4 x1 + 2 x2 <= 36
x1 , x 2 > = 0
Solution
Feasible Solution
Optimal Solution
Graphis Simplex
Graphical Method
X2
Sewing 4 x1 + 2 x2 <= 36
18
Z= 10 x1 + 15 x2
Optimal Material
10
2 x1 + 5 x2 <= 50
Feasible
Solution X1
9 25
Departemen Teknik Industri
Optimal Solution
Produce Jacket X1 : 5 unit/week
Produce Slack X2 : 8 unit/week
Profit Z : $ 170/week
Transportation Model
P Q
1 2 3 ....... 8
Data
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A B C D E F G H Supply
P 12 24 21 20 21.5 19 17 20 100
Q 24 15 28 20 18.5 19.5 24 28 45
Dmd 22 14 18 17 15 13 15 20
Component of Model
Performance Criteria :
Min. Cost
Variable Decision :
Number of product to be supplied from plant i
(Si)
Number of product to be transported from plant
i to retailer j( Xij)
Constraints:
Supply
Demand
Model Formulation
Subject to:
1). X11 + X12 + X13 + X14 + X15 + X16 +X17 + X18 <=100
2). X21 + X22 + X23 + X24 + X25 + X26 +X27 + X28 <= 45
Model Formulation
3). X11 + X21 = 22
4). X12 + X22 = 14
5). X13 + X23 = 18
6). X14 + X24 = 17
7). X15 + X25 = 15
8). X16 + X26 = 13
9). X17 + X27 = 15
10). X18 + X28 = 20
All Variable Non Negative
Optimal Solution
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A B C D E F G H Supply
P 22 - 18 17 - 13 15 4 89
Q - 14 - - 15 - - 16 45
Dmnd 22 14 18 17 15 13 15 20 134
Minimal Cost = $ 2583.50
Optimal Solution
P Q
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Step Solved Its Closest Total Time nth Nearest Its Min. Its Last
Nodes Conc.un Sl Involved Node Time Contion
1 A B 90 B 90 AB*
A D 138
A C 348
2 A C 138 C 138 AC
A D 348
B C 90+66=156
B E 90+84=174
3 A D 348
B E 90+84=174 E 174 BE*
C D 138+156=294
C F 138+90=228
4 A D 348
C D 138+156=294
C F 138+ 90=228 F 228 CF
E F 174+132=306
E I 174+84 =258
Falsafah Teknik Industri - Management 54
Science Approach
Departemen Teknik Industri
Step Solved Its Closest Total Time nth Nearest Its Min. Its Last
Nodes Conc.un Sl Involved Node Time Contion
5 A D 348
C D 138156=294
E I 174+84=258 I 258 EI*
F G 228132=360
F H 228+60=288
6 A D 348
C D 138+156=294
F G 228+132=360
F H 228+ 60=288 H 288 FH
I H 258+132=390
I J 258+126=384
7 A D 348
C D 138+156=294
F G 228+132=360
H G 288+ 48=336 G 336 HG
I J 258+126=384
Falsafah Teknik Industri - Management 55
Science Approach
Departemen Teknik Industri
Step Solved Its Closest Total Time nth Nearest Its Min. Its Last
Nodes Conc.un Sl Involved Node Time Contion
8 A D 348 D 348 AD
C D 138+156=294
G D 336+ 48=384
G J 336+150=486
H J 288+126=414
I J 258+126=384
9 G J 336+150=486
H J 288+126=414
I J 258+126=384 J 384 IJ*
Integrated Approach
Integrated Approach
Memandang Sesuatu Secara Menyeluruh
Dan Komprehensif Tidak Bersifat
Parsial
Systemic Approach
Contoh
Shortest Route ?
Origin
A 90 B
84 E 84 I
66
138
C 132
90 132
348
F 60 126
156
H
132 48
126
D
48 J
G 150
Destination
Solusi
Parsial
Methoda : Logik ambil jarak terpendek pada
setiap node
Hasil : A-B-C-F-H-G-J (494)
Integrated
Methoda : Dinamik programmning
Hasil : A-B-E-I-J ( 384)
Systemic Aspect
Structural Aspect
Man, Machine, Material
Functional Aspect
Man-man, Man-Material, Man-Machine, Feed-back
Boundary
Environment
Stakeholder and Societal
Objective
Unitary, pluralist, coercive
Man
+
Natural System and/or Artificial System
Schematic Representation
Environment
Boundary
Man Machine
Input Out-put
Mat
Feed-back : Interaction
Decision Solution
Action
Real
System
Model
Problem IE Standard
Data /Information
Characteristic of Integrated
Approach
Problem : Real
Approach : Systemic
Model : Valid
Solution : Feasible
Decision : Effective
Action : Implemented
Model Formulation
Solution
No
Valid ?
Stop
Falsafah Teknik Industri - Management 67
Science Approach
Departemen Teknik Industri
Analysis of System
Formulate the Problem
Determine Performance Criteria
Identification of Components Model
Decision Variable
Constraints
Parameter
Logical Relationship
Problem Formulation
Do Not Confuse Among !!!
Symptom
Root Causes
Alternative of Solution
Problem
Any unsatisfactory situation
Symptom
Claims
Difference: Expectation vs Reality
Root Causes
Problem
Falsafah Teknik Industri - Management 70
Science Approach
Departemen Teknik Industri
Symptom
Indicator of the Problem
Problem Could Exist Although Without
Any Symptom
Form: Claims, Differences Expectation
and Reality
Symptom
Difference
Expectation Reality
Objective Achievement
Falsafah Teknik Industri - Management 72
Science Approach
Departemen Teknik Industri
Root Causes
Causes of the symptom
Use systemic approach to identify
Indicator
Performance Criteria
Efficiency
Objective Vs
Achievement/Actual
Performance Criteria
A. Types
1. Single Criteria
2. Multi Criteria
B. Level of Management
1. Company level
2. Business level
3. Operational level
Components Model
Performave Criteria
Decision Variable
Constraints
Parameter
Logical Relationship
Model Formulation
Solution
Value of Decision Variable
Input For Decision Making
Validation
Logical Validation (Verification)
Is the Model Logic and Rational ?
Historical Validation
Is the Model Fit With the Past Performance ?
Result Validation
Is the Model Fit With the Future Performance ?
Decision
Problem
Decision Criteria
Solution + Judgment
Scientific Art
Falsafah Teknik Industri - Management 81
Science Approach
Departemen Teknik Industri
Action
How Decision Could Be Implemented ?
Action